Literature DB >> 30356211

The Moral Machine experiment.

Edmond Awad1, Sohan Dsouza1, Richard Kim1, Jonathan Schulz2, Joseph Henrich2, Azim Shariff3, Jean-François Bonnefon4, Iyad Rahwan5,6.   

Abstract

With the rapid development of artificial intelligence have come concerns about how machines will make moral decisions, and the major challenge of quantifying societal expectations about the ethical principles that should guide machine behaviour. To address this challenge, we deployed the Moral Machine, an online experimental platform designed to explore the moral dilemmas faced by autonomous vehicles. This platform gathered 40 million decisions in ten languages from millions of people in 233 countries and territories. Here we describe the results of this experiment. First, we summarize global moral preferences. Second, we document individual variations in preferences, based on respondents' demographics. Third, we report cross-cultural ethical variation, and uncover three major clusters of countries. Fourth, we show that these differences correlate with modern institutions and deep cultural traits. We discuss how these preferences can contribute to developing global, socially acceptable principles for machine ethics. All data used in this article are publicly available.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30356211     DOI: 10.1038/s41586-018-0637-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  67 in total

Review 1.  Machine behaviour.

Authors:  Iyad Rahwan; Manuel Cebrian; Nick Obradovich; Josh Bongard; Jean-François Bonnefon; Cynthia Breazeal; Jacob W Crandall; Nicholas A Christakis; Iain D Couzin; Matthew O Jackson; Nicholas R Jennings; Ece Kamar; Isabel M Kloumann; Hugo Larochelle; David Lazer; Richard McElreath; Alan Mislove; David C Parkes; Alex 'Sandy' Pentland; Margaret E Roberts; Azim Shariff; Joshua B Tenenbaum; Michael Wellman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2019-04-24       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Ethical principles and a practical approach to support policy making through the next phases of the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond.

Authors:  Zoë Fritz; Julian L Huppert; Kathleen Liddell; Richard Holton; Jonathan P Fuld
Journal:  Clin Med (Lond)       Date:  2020-12-29       Impact factor: 2.659

3.  Association of natural sleep with moral utilitarianism: No evidence from 6 preregistered studies.

Authors:  Bastien Trémolière; Corentin J Gosling
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-05-23

Review 4.  Integrating explanation and prediction in computational social science.

Authors:  Jake M Hofman; Duncan J Watts; Susan Athey; Filiz Garip; Thomas L Griffiths; Jon Kleinberg; Helen Margetts; Sendhil Mullainathan; Matthew J Salganik; Simine Vazire; Alessandro Vespignani; Tal Yarkoni
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Scaling up psychology via Scientific Regret Minimization.

Authors:  Mayank Agrawal; Joshua C Peterson; Thomas L Griffiths
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Artificial cognition: How experimental psychology can help generate explainable artificial intelligence.

Authors:  J Eric T Taylor; Graham W Taylor
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2020-11-06

Review 7.  Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response.

Authors:  Jay J Van Bavel; Katherine Baicker; Paulo S Boggio; Valerio Capraro; Aleksandra Cichocka; Mina Cikara; Molly J Crockett; Alia J Crum; Karen M Douglas; James N Druckman; John Drury; Oeindrila Dube; Naomi Ellemers; Eli J Finkel; James H Fowler; Michele Gelfand; Shihui Han; S Alexander Haslam; Jolanda Jetten; Shinobu Kitayama; Dean Mobbs; Lucy E Napper; Dominic J Packer; Gordon Pennycook; Ellen Peters; Richard E Petty; David G Rand; Stephen D Reicher; Simone Schnall; Azim Shariff; Linda J Skitka; Sandra Susan Smith; Cass R Sunstein; Nassim Tabri; Joshua A Tucker; Sander van der Linden; Paul van Lange; Kim A Weeden; Michael J A Wohl; Jamil Zaki; Sean R Zion; Robb Willer
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2020-04-30

8.  Classical Liberalism, Discrimination, and the Problem of Autonomous Cars.

Authors:  Michael Gentzel
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 3.525

9.  Intelligent, Autonomous Machines in Surgery.

Authors:  Tyler J Loftus; Amanda C Filiberto; Jeremy Balch; Alexander L Ayzengart; Patrick J Tighe; Parisa Rashidi; Azra Bihorac; Gilbert R Upchurch
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2020-04-24       Impact factor: 2.192

10.  Trolley Dilemma in Papua. Yali horticulturalists refuse to pull the lever.

Authors:  Piotr Sorokowski; Michalina Marczak; Michał Misiak; Michał Białek
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2020-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.