Literature DB >> 30355877

Smartphone-based evaluation of the optic nerve head.

Amar Pujari1, Ritika Mukhija1, Rohan Chawla1, Swati Phuljhele1, Rohit Saxena1, Pradeep Sharma1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  Imaging; optic disc; smartphones

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30355877      PMCID: PMC6213667          DOI: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_394_18

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0301-4738            Impact factor:   1.848


× No keyword cloud information.
In the first setting, the optic nerve head findings are documented using a smartphone, a high magnifying lens that is clipped over the camera of the smartphone [Fig. 1a and b] and a 90 D lens. The images are captured after adequate pupillary dilatation, and with the patient looking straight ahead. For examining the patient's right eye, a 90 D lens held in the left hand of the examiner is placed close to the patient's eye and phone clipped with the magnifying lens is slowly moved forward and pictures are obtained [Fig. 1c]. Following are a few examples of the clinical conditions captured using this technique: (1) Glaucomatous optic disc cupping, (2) normal disc, (3) temporal crescent, and (4) papillitis [Fig. 1d–g].
Figure 1

(a and b) Detached small portable high magnifying lens and after mounting it on the smartphone. (c) The 90 D lens is held in the left hand and the clipped smartphone in the right hand to capture the disc and posterior pole images. (d) Glaucomatous optic disc cupping. (e) Healthy optic disc. (f) Temporal crescent. (g) Papillitis. (h) The smartphone is directly mounted on the direct ophthalmoscope aperture with either glue or tape. The scope is held in left in one hand and the phone in another hand to capture the images. (i) Healthy right-sided optic nerve head acquired after placing the smartphone camera over the direct ophthalmoscope viewing aperture

(a and b) Detached small portable high magnifying lens and after mounting it on the smartphone. (c) The 90 D lens is held in the left hand and the clipped smartphone in the right hand to capture the disc and posterior pole images. (d) Glaucomatous optic disc cupping. (e) Healthy optic disc. (f) Temporal crescent. (g) Papillitis. (h) The smartphone is directly mounted on the direct ophthalmoscope aperture with either glue or tape. The scope is held in left in one hand and the phone in another hand to capture the images. (i) Healthy right-sided optic nerve head acquired after placing the smartphone camera over the direct ophthalmoscope viewing aperture In the second technique, the direct ophthalmoscope and the smartphone are used together to assess the optic disc and macular pathology. The smartphone camera is fixed directly onto the direct ophthalmoscope eye aperture (with glue or tape) [Fig. 1h] and the scope is slowly moved toward the patient's eye. Even though it is possible to appreciate the findings in un-dilated pupil, dilation is necessary to facilitate capturing the images with ease [Fig. 1i].

Discussion

Clinical assessment of the optic disc using the smartphone and an adapter has been noted in few observations.[1234] Our technique is both simple and cost-effective and in addition, the technique can be disseminated to medical colleagues from other specialties to document fundus findings in cases where immediate assessment by an ophthalmologist is not possible.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.
  3 in total

1.  Validation of Smartphone Based Retinal Photography for Diabetic Retinopathy Screening.

Authors:  Ramachandran Rajalakshmi; Subramanian Arulmalar; Manoharan Usha; Vijayaraghavan Prathiba; Khaji Syed Kareemuddin; Ranjit Mohan Anjana; Viswanathan Mohan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  A Novel Device to Exploit the Smartphone Camera for Fundus Photography.

Authors:  Andrea Russo; Francesco Morescalchi; Ciro Costagliola; Luisa Delcassi; Francesco Semeraro
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 1.909

3.  Clinical Validation of a Smartphone-Based Adapter for Optic Disc Imaging in Kenya.

Authors:  Andrew Bastawrous; Mario Ettore Giardini; Nigel M Bolster; Tunde Peto; Nisha Shah; Iain A T Livingstone; Helen A Weiss; Sen Hu; Hillary Rono; Hannah Kuper; Matthew Burton
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 7.389

  3 in total
  9 in total

Review 1.  Clinically useful smartphone ophthalmic imaging techniques.

Authors:  Amar Pujari; Gunjan Saluja; Divya Agarwal; Harathy Selvan; Namrata Sharma
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-09-11       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Measurement of ocular counter-roll using iris images during binocular fixation and head tilt.

Authors:  Kwang-Keun Oh; Byeong-Yeon Moon; Hyun Gug Cho; Sang-Yeob Kim; Dong-Sik Yu
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 1.671

3.  Unmodified iPhone XS Max for fundus montage imaging in cases of retinoblastoma.

Authors:  Amar Pujari; Neiwete Lomi; Siddhi Goel; Saumya Yadav; Ritika Mukhija; Prashant Kumar; Atul Kumar
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 1.848

4.  Commentary: Seeing the big picture: Panoramic smartphone fundus imaging sans accessories.

Authors:  John D Akkara; Anju Kuriakose
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 1.848

5.  The additional role of unmodified iPhone X as a direct ophthalmoscope.

Authors:  Amar Pujari; Ashish Markan; Rohan Chawla; Meghal Gagrani
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 1.848

Review 6.  The Development and Clinical Application of Innovative Optical Ophthalmic Imaging Techniques.

Authors:  Palaiologos Alexopoulos; Chisom Madu; Gadi Wollstein; Joel S Schuman
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-06-30

7.  Commentary: Dawn of smartphones in frugal ophthalmic innovation.

Authors:  John Davis Akkara
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 1.848

8.  Commentary: Change in trends of imaging the retina.

Authors:  Ashish Arjun Ahuja; Ashish Kamble
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 1.848

9.  Commentary: The glued intraocular lens smartphone microscope.

Authors:  John Davis Akkara; Anju Kuriakose
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 1.848

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.