| Literature DB >> 30355671 |
Alessandro Tanca1, Antonio Palomba1, Cristina Fraumene1, Valeria Manghina2, Michael Silverman3,4, Sergio Uzzau5,2.
Abstract
Increasing evidence suggests that the intestinal microbiota is involved in the pathogenesis of type 1 diabetes (T1D). Here we sought to determine which gut microbial taxa and functions vary between nonobese diabetic (NOD) mice and genetically modified NOD mice protected from T1D (Eα16/NOD) at 10 weeks of age in the time window between insulitis development and T1D onset. The gut microbiota of NOD mice were investigated by analyzing stool samples with a metaproteogenomic approach, comprising both 16S rRNA gene sequencing and microbial proteome profiling through high-resolution mass spectrometry. A depletion of Firmicutes (particularly, several members of Lachnospiraceae) in the NOD gut microbiota was observed compared to the level in the Eα16/NOD mice microbiota. Moreover, the analysis of proteins actively produced by the gut microbiota revealed different profiles between NOD and Eα16/NOD mice, with the production of butyrate biosynthesis enzymes being significantly reduced in diabetic mice. Our results support a model for gut microbiota influence on T1D development involving bacterium-produced metabolites as butyrate.IMPORTANCE Alterations of the gut microbiota early in age have been hypothesized to impact T1D autoimmune pathogenesis. In the NOD mouse model, protection from T1D has been found to operate via modulation of the composition of the intestinal microbiota during a critical early window of ontogeny, although little is known about microbiota functions related to T1D development. Here, we show which gut microbial functions are specifically associated with protection from T1D in the time window between insulitis development and T1D onset. In particular, we describe that production of butyrate biosynthesis enzymes is significantly reduced in NOD mice, supporting the hypothesis that modulating the gut microbiota butyrate production may influence T1D development.Entities:
Keywords: butyrate; diabetes; metaproteomics; microbiome; short-chain fatty acids
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30355671 PMCID: PMC6200989 DOI: 10.1128/mSphere.00492-18
Source DB: PubMed Journal: mSphere ISSN: 2379-5042 Impact factor: 4.389
FIG 1Microbial genera showing significantly differential abundances between Eα16/NOD and NOD mouse fecal metaproteomes. Genera detected in all samples of at least one group are shown. Each dot represents a different mouse, with Eα16/NOD and NOD littermates reared in the same cage having the same shape. A paired sample test based on an inverted beta binomial model was used, with each pair of samples comprising two littermates with different genotypes. *, q value < 0.05; **, q value < 0.01.
FIG 2Expression of butyrate biosynthesis enzymes in the fecal microbiotas of Eα16/NOD and NOD mice according to metaproteomic results. (Top) Schematic of butyrate biosynthetic pathway (from pyruvate to butyrate), with Enzyme Commission numbers corresponding to each enzyme. EC 2.3.1.54, formate acetyltransferase; EC 2.3.1.9, acetyl-CoA acetyltransferase; EC 1.1.1.157, 3-hydroxybutyryl-CoA dehydrogenase; EC 4.2.1.150, short-chain-enoyl-CoA hydratase; EC 1.3.8.1, butyryl-CoA dehydrogenase; EC 2.3.1.19, phosphate butyryltransferase; EC 2.7.2.7, butyrate kinase. (Middle) Scatterplots illustrating the relative abundance of each butyrogenic enzyme in the fecal microbiotas of Eα16/NOD and NOD mice; each dot represents a different mouse, with Eα16/NOD and NOD littermates reared in the same cage having the same shape. A paired sample test based on an inverted beta binomial model was used, with each pair of samples comprising two littermates with different genotypes. *, q value < 0.05; **, q value < 0.01; ***, q value < 0.001. (Bottom) Heatmaps showing the relative distribution of the taxonomic assignments (according to the lowest-common-ancestor principle) associated with each enzyme. Taxa associated with at least one enzyme and found in at least 4 mice are reported. Boxes: 1, Firmicutes; 2, Firmicutes, Clostridia; 3, Firmicutes, Clostridia, Clostridiales; 4, Firmicutes, Clostridia, Clostridiales, Clostridiaceae, Clostridium; 5, Firmicutes, Clostridia, Clostridiales, Eubacteriaceae, Eubacterium; 6, Firmicutes, Clostridia, Clostridiales, Lachnospiraceae; 7, Firmicutes, Clostridia, Clostridiales, Lachnospiraceae, Roseburia; 8, Firmicutes, Clostridia, Clostridiales, Oscillospiraceae, Oscillibacter.