Literature DB >> 30355087

Resting-State Functional Connectivity Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Outcome After Acute Stroke.

Josep Puig1, Gerard Blasco1, Angel Alberich-Bayarri2, Gottfried Schlaug3, Gustavo Deco4,5, Carles Biarnes1, Marian Navas-Martí1, Mireia Rivero6, Jordi Gich6, Jaume Figueras7, Cristina Torres7, Pepus Daunis-I-Estadella8, Celia L Oramas-Requejo1, Joaquín Serena6, Cathy M Stinear9, Amy Kuceyeski10, Carles Soriano-Mas11,12,13, Götz Thomalla14, Marco Essig15, Chase R Figley15, Bijoy Menon16, Andrew Demchuk16, Kambiz Nael17, Max Wintermark18, David S Liebeskind19, Salvador Pedraza1.   

Abstract

Background and Purpose- Physiological effects of stroke are best assessed over entire brain networks rather than just focally at the site of structural damage. Resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging can map functional-anatomic networks by analyzing spontaneously correlated low-frequency activity fluctuations across the brain, but its potential usefulness in predicting functional outcome after acute stroke remains unknown. We assessed the ability of resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging to predict functional outcome after acute stroke. Methods- We scanned 37 consecutive reperfused stroke patients (age, 69±14 years; 14 females; 3-day National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, 6±5) on day 3 after symptom onset. After imaging preprocessing, we used a whole-brain mask to calculate the correlation coefficient matrices for every paired region using the Harvard-Oxford probabilistic atlas. To evaluate functional outcome, we applied the modified Rankin Scale at 90 days. We used region of interest analyses to explore the functional connectivity between regions and graph-computation analysis to detect differences in functional connectivity between patients with good functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale score ≤2) and those with poor outcome (modified Rankin Scale score >2). Results- Patients with good outcome had greater functional connectivity than patients with poor outcome. Although 3-day National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score was the most accurate independent predictor of 90-day modified Rankin Scale (84.2%), adding functional connectivity increased accuracy to 94.7%. Preserved bilateral interhemispheric connectivity between the anterior inferior temporal gyrus and superior frontal gyrus and decreased connectivity between the caudate and anterior inferior temporal gyrus in the left hemisphere had the greatest impact in favoring good prognosis. Conclusions- These data suggest that information about functional connectivity from resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging may help predict 90-day stroke outcome.

Entities:  

Keywords:  brain; magnetic resonance imaging; patients; reperfusion; stroke

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30355087      PMCID: PMC6645916          DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.021319

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stroke        ISSN: 0039-2499            Impact factor:   7.914


  47 in total

1.  Seven-day NIHSS is a sensitive outcome measure for exploratory clinical trials in acute stroke: evidence from the Virtual International Stroke Trials Archive.

Authors:  Daniel M Kerr; Rachael L Fulton; Kennedy R Lees
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2012-02-02       Impact factor: 7.914

2.  Comparison of physiological noise at 1.5 T, 3 T and 7 T and optimization of fMRI acquisition parameters.

Authors:  C Triantafyllou; R D Hoge; G Krueger; C J Wiggins; A Potthast; G C Wiggins; L L Wald
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2005-05-15       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Coherent spontaneous activity accounts for trial-to-trial variability in human evoked brain responses.

Authors:  Michael D Fox; Abraham Z Snyder; Jeffrey M Zacks; Marcus E Raichle
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2005-12-11       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 4.  Mechanisms underlying recovery of motor function after stroke.

Authors:  Nick S Ward; Leonardo G Cohen
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  2004-12

5.  Brain Connectivity and Functional Recovery in Patients With Ischemic Stroke.

Authors:  Sara Regina Meira Almeida; Jessica Vicentini; Leonardo Bonilha; Brunno M De Campos; Raphael F Casseb; Li Li Min
Journal:  J Neuroimaging       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 2.486

6.  Disruptions of network connectivity predict impairment in multiple behavioral domains after stroke.

Authors:  Joshua Sarfaty Siegel; Lenny E Ramsey; Abraham Z Snyder; Nicholas V Metcalf; Ravi V Chacko; Kilian Weinberger; Antonello Baldassarre; Carl D Hacker; Gordon L Shulman; Maurizio Corbetta
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Measurements of acute cerebral infarction: a clinical examination scale.

Authors:  T Brott; H P Adams; C P Olinger; J R Marler; W G Barsan; J Biller; J Spilker; R Holleran; R Eberle; V Hertzberg
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 7.914

8.  Cortical afferents to the entorhinal cortex of the Rhesus monkey.

Authors:  G W Van Hoesen; D N Pandya; N Butters
Journal:  Science       Date:  1972-03-31       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Predicting recovery of voluntary upper extremity movement in subacute stroke patients with severe upper extremity paresis.

Authors:  Chia-Lin Koh; Shin-Liang Pan; Jiann-Shing Jeng; Bang-Bin Chen; Yen-Ho Wang; I-Ping Hsueh; Ching-Lin Hsieh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Global and regional burden of first-ever ischaemic and haemorrhagic stroke during 1990-2010: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010.

Authors:  Rita V Krishnamurthi; Valery L Feigin; Mohammad H Forouzanfar; George A Mensah; Myles Connor; Derrick A Bennett; Andrew E Moran; Ralph L Sacco; Laurie M Anderson; Thomas Truelsen; Martin O'Donnell; Narayanaswamy Venketasubramanian; Suzanne Barker-Collo; Carlene M M Lawes; Wenzhi Wang; Yukito Shinohara; Emma Witt; Majid Ezzati; Mohsen Naghavi; Christopher Murray
Journal:  Lancet Glob Health       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 26.763

View more
  20 in total

1.  The Prognostic Utility of Electroencephalography in Stroke Recovery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Amanda A Vatinno; Annie Simpson; Viswanathan Ramakrishnan; Heather S Bonilha; Leonardo Bonilha; Na Jin Seo
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2022-03-20       Impact factor: 3.919

2.  Personalized neurorehabilitative precision medicine: from data to therapies (MWKNeuroReha) - a multi-centre prospective observational clinical trial to predict long-term outcome of patients with acute motor stroke.

Authors:  Corinna Blum; David Baur; Lars-Christian Achauer; Philipp Berens; Stephanie Biergans; Michael Erb; Volker Hömberg; Ziwei Huang; Oliver Kohlbacher; Joachim Liepert; Tobias Lindig; Gabriele Lohmann; Jakob H Macke; Jörg Römhild; Christine Rösinger-Hein; Brigitte Zrenner; Ulf Ziemann
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  Machine Learning Methods Predict Individual Upper-Limb Motor Impairment Following Therapy in Chronic Stroke.

Authors:  Ceren Tozlu; Dylan Edwards; Aaron Boes; Douglas Labar; K Zoe Tsagaris; Joshua Silverstein; Heather Pepper Lane; Mert R Sabuncu; Charles Liu; Amy Kuceyeski
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 3.919

4.  Combined lesion-deficit and fMRI approaches in single-case studies: Unique contributions to cognitive neuroscience.

Authors:  Carolina Deifelt Streese; Daniel Tranel
Journal:  Curr Opin Behav Sci       Date:  2021-02-09

5.  Abnormal brain functional and structural connectivity between the left supplementary motor area and inferior frontal gyrus in moyamoya disease.

Authors:  Junwen Hu; Yin Li; Zhaoqing Li; Jingyin Chen; Yang Cao; Duo Xu; Leilei Zheng; Ruiliang Bai; Lin Wang
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 2.474

6.  Default Mode Network Connectivity Predicts Emotion Recognition and Social Integration After Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  Katie Lancaster; Umesh M Venkatesan; Jean Lengenfelder; Helen M Genova
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 4.003

Review 7.  Imaging Functional Recovery Following Ischemic Stroke: Clinical and Preclinical fMRI Studies.

Authors:  Andrew Crofts; Michael E Kelly; Claire L Gibson
Journal:  J Neuroimaging       Date:  2019-10-13       Impact factor: 2.486

Review 8.  The Utility of Domain-Specific End Points in Acute Stroke Trials.

Authors:  Steven C Cramer; Steven L Wolf; Jeffrey L Saver; Karen C Johnston; J Mocco; Maarten G Lansberg; Sean I Savitz; David S Liebeskind; Wade Smith; Max Wintermark; Jordan J Elm; Pooja Khatri; Joseph P Broderick; Scott Janis
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 7.914

9.  Establishing an acquisition and processing protocol for resting state networks with a 1.5 T scanner: A case series in a middle-income country.

Authors:  Michela Moreno-Ayure; Cristian Páez; María A López-Arias; Johan L Mendez-Betancurt; Edgar G Ordóñez-Rubiano; Jorge Rudas; Cristian Pulido; Francisco Gómez; Darwin Martínez; Cesar O Enciso-Olivera; Diana P Rivera-Triana; Rosangela Casanova-Libreros; Natalia Aguilera; Jorge H Marín-Muñoz
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-07-10       Impact factor: 1.817

10.  Interhemispheric Functional Connectivity in the Primary Motor Cortex Assessed by Resting-State Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Aids Long-Term Recovery Prediction among Subacute Stroke Patients with Severe Hand Weakness.

Authors:  Yu-Sun Min; Jang Woo Park; Eunhee Park; Ae-Ryoung Kim; Hyunsil Cha; Dae-Won Gwak; Seung-Hwan Jung; Yongmin Chang; Tae-Du Jung
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 4.241

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.