Literature DB >> 30354631

Subgroup Analysis Comparing Ultrathin, Bioresorbable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Thin, Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients.

Ariel Roguin1, David E Kandzari2, Erez Marcusohn1, Jacques J Koolen3, Gheorghe Doros4, Joseph M Massaro5, Hector M Garcia-Garcia6, Johan Bennett7, Elie G Gharib8, Donald E Cutlip9, Ron Waksman6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Presentation with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) constitutes a high-risk subset of patients with worse outcome after percutaneous coronary intervention. We report clinical outcomes in subjects with ACS from the BIOFLOW V trial (BIOTRONIK - A Prospective Randomized Multicenter Study to Assess the Safety and Effectiveness of the Orsiro Sirolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System in the Treatment of Subjects With up to Three De Novo or Restenotic Coronary Artery Lesions) comparing an ultrathin strut (60 μm) bioresorbable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent (BP-SES) with a thin strut (81 μm) durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent (DP-EES). METHODS AND
RESULTS: Among 1334 patients randomized to 2:1 treatment with either BP-SES or DP-EES, 677 (50.7%) ACS patients without ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (MI; 454 BP-SES and 223 DP-EES) were identified in the retrospective post hoc analysis. The primary end point of 12-month target lesion failure, individual component end points, and stent thrombosis were evaluated. Recurrent MI was defined as a ≥50% increase of creatine kinase-myocardial band or in the absence of creatine kinase-myocardial band, troponin >50% increase over previous level and >3× the upper limit of normal). All events were adjudicated by a blinded independent clinical events committee. Overall, baseline clinical, angiographic, and procedural characteristics of the ACS population were similar between the 2 treatment groups. At 12 months, target lesion failure occurred in 5.6% (24/426) of BP-SES patients versus 11.0% (23/209) in DP-EES patients ( P=0.02); target lesion failure composite components were cardiac death, 0% versus 1.0% ( P=0.11); target vessel-related MI, 3.5% versus 9.7% ( P=0.003); and clinically driven target lesion revascularization, 2.8% versus 3.4% ( P=0.80). Spontaneous target vessel MI was 0.5% (2/425) for BP-SES versus 2.4% (5/206) for DP-EES ( P=0.041). Stent thrombosis rates at 1 year were similar (0.5% versus 1.0%; P=0.601).
CONCLUSIONS: In the ACS subgroup population of the BIOFLOW V study, treatment with BP-SES compared with DP-EES was associated with a significantly lower rate of 12-month target lesion failure, a difference driven by significantly lower periprocedural MI and spontaneous MI. These findings support treatment with an ultrathin strut BP-SES in ACS patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT02389946.

Entities:  

Keywords:  coronary artery disease; drug-eluting stent; everolimus; percutaneous coronary intervention; sirolimus; thrombosis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30354631     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.007331

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1941-7640            Impact factor:   6.546


  7 in total

Review 1.  Double or Triple Antithrombotic Treatment in Atrial Fibrillation Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Authors:  Despoina-Rafailia Benetou; Charalampos Varlamos; Aikaterini Mpahara; Dimitrios Alexopoulos
Journal:  Am J Cardiovasc Drugs       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 3.571

Review 2.  The Future of Cardiovascular Stents: Bioresorbable and Integrated Biosensor Technology.

Authors:  Daniel Hoare; Anubhav Bussooa; Steven Neale; Nosrat Mirzai; John Mercer
Journal:  Adv Sci (Weinh)       Date:  2019-08-19       Impact factor: 16.806

3.  Clinical outcomes of an ultrathin-strut sirolimus-eluting stent in all-comers population: Thailand Orsiro registry.

Authors:  Pannipa Suwannasom; Siriporn Athiksakul; Tasalak Thonghong; Vorarit Lertsuwunseri; Jarkarpun Chaipromprasit; Suphot Srimahachota; Wasan Udayachalerm; Srun Kuanprasert; Wacin Buddhari
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2021-10-16       Impact factor: 2.298

4.  Gender-Associated Outcomes Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With a Third-Generation, Ultrathin-Strut Drug-Eluting Stent: A Real-World, Single-Center Experience.

Authors:  Sebastiano Gili; Stefano Galli; Giovanni Teruzzi; Giulia Santagostino Baldi; Paolo Ravagnani; Franco Fabbiocchi; Antonio Bartorelli; Piero Montorsi; Daniela Trabattoni
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-02-11

5.  Ticagrelor Monotherapy After 3-Month Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Acute Coronary Syndrome by High Bleeding Risk: The Subanalysis From the TICO Trial.

Authors:  Yong-Joon Lee; Yongsung Suh; Jung-Sun Kim; Yun-Hyeong Cho; Kyeong Ho Yun; Yong Hoon Kim; Jae Young Cho; Ae-Young Her; Sungsoo Cho; Dong Woon Jeon; Sang-Yong Yoo; Deok-Kyu Cho; Bum-Kee Hong; Hyuckmoon Kwon; Sung-Jin Hong; Chul-Min Ahn; Dong-Ho Shin; Chung-Mo Nam; Byeong-Keuk Kim; Young-Guk Ko; Donghoon Choi; Myeong-Ki Hong; Yangsoo Jang
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2021-12-28       Impact factor: 3.243

6.  One-year performance of thin-strut cobalt chromium sirolimus-eluting stent versus thicker strut stainless steel biolimus-eluting coronary stent: a propensity-matched analysis of two international all-comers registries.

Authors:  Selina Vlieger; Gian B Danzi; Floris Kauer; Rohit M Oemrawsingh; Sinisa Stojkovic; Alexander J J IJsselmuiden; Helen Routledge; Peep Laanmets; Marco Roffi; Ole Fröbert; Pascual Baello; Adrian Wlodarczak; Angel Puentes; Jawed Polad; David Hildick-Smith
Journal:  Coron Artery Dis       Date:  2021-08-01       Impact factor: 1.439

7.  Cardiovascular outcomes associated with Ultrathin bioresorbable polymer sirolimus eluting stents versus thin, durable polymer everolimus eluting stents following percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A meta-analysis of published studies.

Authors:  Shibing Deng; Xuying Yi; Zhiming Tian
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-12-24       Impact factor: 1.817

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.