Literature DB >> 30354492

Myocardial Fibrosis Predicts 10-Year Survival in Patients Undergoing Aortic Valve Replacement.

Sebastian Herrmann1,2, Bastian Fries1, Tim Salinger1,2, Dan Liu1, Kai Hu1, Daniel Gensler1,2, Jörg Strotmann3, Martin Christa1,2, Meinrad Beer4, Stefan Gattenlöhner5, Stefan Störk1,2, Wolfram Voelker1,2, Constanze Bening6, Kristina Lorenz7,8, Rainer Leyh6, Stefan Frantz1,2, Georg Ertl1,2, Frank Weidemann1,2, Peter Nordbeck1,2.   

Abstract

Background Long-term data on evolution and clinical impact of myocardial fibrosis in valvular heart disease are scarce. Methods and Results In this 10 years' extension of a prospective study in patients undergoing conventional aortic valve replacement because of symptomatic severe aortic valve stenosis, the impact of myocardial replacement fibrosis (MRF) on long-term outcome was assessed. Endomyocardial biopsies were acquired during aortic valve replacement in 58 consecutive patients. MRF was graded using the calculated percentage area of fibrosis and patients categorized as severe (n=21), mild (n=15), and no fibrosis (n=22). Echocardiography including strain imaging, as well as cardiovascular magnetic resonance, to assess late gadolinium enhancement was performed at baseline, 1, and 10 years after aortic valve replacement. Death of any cause occurred in 21 patients (38.9%): 3 (14.3%) in the group without MRF, 6 (42.9%) in the mild MRF group, and 12 (63.2%) in the severe MRF group ( P=0.006), resulting in the lowest cumulative survival for patients with severe MRF (log-rank P=0.003). In the group without MRF, none died of cardiovascular cause. MRF was found to be an independent predictor of survival (hazard ratio, 1.271; 95% CI, 1.032-1.564; P=0.024). Conclusions This 10-year follow-up study underlines the profound impact of replacement fibrosis with regard to cardiac and all-cause mortality in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement for severe aortic valve stenosis. Integrating cardiovascular magnetic resonance and echocardiographic functional imaging beyond ejection fraction quantification could help in clinical decision making to stratify patient prognosis with regard to myocardial longitudinal function and prevalence of replacement fibrosis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aortic valve stenosis; echocardiography; fibrosis; magnetic resonance imaging; prevalence

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30354492     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.117.007131

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1941-9651            Impact factor:   7.792


  13 in total

Review 1.  Myocardial Interstitial Fibrosis in Nonischemic Heart Disease, Part 3/4: JACC Focus Seminar.

Authors:  Javier Díez; Arantxa González; Jason C Kovacic
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2020-05-05       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 2.  The Role of Multimodality Imaging in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Authors:  Qi Liu; Rebecca T Hahn
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2019-07-19       Impact factor: 2.931

3.  Peak systolic myocardial velocity in patients undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis: prognostic value and natural course.

Authors:  Ji-Hyun Chin; Sehee Kim; Dongho Kim; Jae-Sik Nam; Kyungmi Kim; In-Cheol Choi
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2022-07-25       Impact factor: 1.977

4.  Fragmented QRS complex may predict long-term mortality after isolated surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Cafer Panç; Arda Güler; Arda Can Doğan; Recep Gülmez; Ahmet Güner; Ömer Çelik
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2021-08-27

5.  Assessing Cardiac Remodeling in Aortic Regurgitation Using Indexed Extracellular Volume: More Than Meets the "i"?

Authors:  Michael Salerno; Toral Patel
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2021-11

Review 6.  Challenges and opportunities in improving left ventricular remodelling and clinical outcome following surgical and trans-catheter aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Xu Yu Jin; Mario Petrou; Jiang Ting Hu; Ed D Nicol; John R Pepper
Journal:  Front Med       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 4.592

7.  Prognostic Value of Computed Tomography-Derived Extracellular Volume in TAVR Patients With Low-Flow Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis.

Authors:  Balaji Tamarappoo; Donghee Han; Jeffrey Tyler; Tarun Chakravarty; Yuka Otaki; Robert Miller; Evann Eisenberg; Siddharth Singh; Takahiro Shiota; Robert Siegel; Jasminka Stegic; Tracy Salseth; Wen Cheng; Damini Dey; Louise Thomson; Daniel Berman; John Friedman; Raj Makkar
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2020-10-28

Review 8.  Cardiac fibrosis.

Authors:  Nikolaos G Frangogiannis
Journal:  Cardiovasc Res       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 10.787

9.  The Degree of Cardiac Remodelling before Overload Relief Triggers Different Transcriptome and miRome Signatures during Reverse Remodelling (RR)-Molecular Signature Differ with the Extent of RR.

Authors:  Patrícia G Rodrigues; Daniela Miranda-Silva; Xidan Li; Cláudia Sousa-Mendes; Ricardo Martins-Ferreira; Zaher Elbeck; Adelino F Leite-Moreira; Ralph Knöll; Inês Falcão-Pires
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-12-18       Impact factor: 5.923

10.  Change and impact of left ventricular global longitudinal strain during transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Authors:  Han Zhang; Jin-Jie Xie; Rong-Juan Li; Yue-Li Wang; Bao-Rong Niu; Li Song; Jing Li; Ya Yang
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2022-02-26       Impact factor: 1.337

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.