Literature DB >> 30353933

Triclosan-induced alteration of gut microbiome and aggravation of asthmatic airway response in aeroallergen-sensitized mice.

Ryoji Hirota1, Yukihiro Ohya2, Kiwako Yamamoto-Hanada2, Yuma Fukutomi3, Go Muto4, Nlandu Roger Ngatu5, Takeshi Nakamura6, Hiroyuki Nakamura7.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30353933      PMCID: PMC6590208          DOI: 10.1111/all.13639

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Allergy        ISSN: 0105-4538            Impact factor:   13.146


× No keyword cloud information.
To the Editor, Triclosan (2,4,4′‐trichloro‐2′‐hydroxydiphenyl ether) is a synthetic, broad‐spectrum antimicrobial agent used extensively in various healthcare products and household consumer goods such as soap, detergents, toothpastes, and other products. Triclosan (TCS) was first introduced in the 1960s for the use in clinical applications. Reports have suggested that TCS is absorbed in human skin and oral mucosa; and it has been detected in various human tissues and fluids.1, 2 In addition, toxicological studies have shown that TCS exposure induces physiological perturbations in animals and in humans.4, 5 Recently, a risk assessment undertaken by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) revealed that TCS was present in the urine samples of 75% of the US general population, and, in 2016, the FDA banned its use in soap products.3, 5 Over the last 6 years, a number of studies have identified a positive correlation between the urinary TCS level and sensitization to food, aeroallergens, and perturbations in asthmatic patients.1, 6, 7 In addition, an experimental study has shown that the topical application of TCS enhances allergic response in ovalbumin (OVA)‐sensitized mice,8 suggesting that TCS might play an adjuvant role in the allergic response to environmental allergens. However, there has still been insufficient evidence to support a relationship between perturbation of the gut microbiome and allergic manifestations in relation to TCS exposure. The aim of this study was to evaluate the in vivo TCS‐induced alteration of the gut microbiome and aggravation of asthmatic airway response in aeroallergen‐sensitized mice. We performed two independent experiments. In the first experiment, wild type BALB/cJ mice (n = 36) were randomly divided into 6 groups of six animals, including normal mice group (normal), Dermatophagoides farinae group (wild‐type + Der f), Der f and diesel exhaust particle (DEP)‐exposed group (asthma), vehicle‐treated Der f‐sensitized mice group (wild type + Der f), 5 mg/kg TCS‐treated mice group (wild type + Der f + 5 mg/kg triclosan), 50 mg/kg TCS‐treated mice group (wild type + Der f + 50 mg/kg triclosan), and 500 mg/kg TCS‐treated mice group (wild type + Der f + 500 mg/kg triclosan). In the second experiment, knockout TLR‐2 (−/−) mice (n = 12) were randomly divided into two groups of six animals that received 4 μg of Der f intratracheally 2 days per week for a total of 4 weeks. Both groups were treated either with vehicle (TLR‐2 (−/−) mice + Der f group) or triclosan 500 mg/kg (TLR‐2 (−/−) mice + Der f + triclosan group) through oral gavage 5 days per week for a total of 4 weeks. On the other hand, airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) to intravenous acetylcholine (ACh) was performed as previously described,8 whereas bronchoconstriction was measured according to the overflow method using a bronchospasm transducer connected to the tracheal cannula. Changes in respiratory overflow volume were measured using an increasing dose of ACh. The area under the curve (AUC), calculated from the dose‐response curves for ACh, was used to express the magnitude of AHR (ImageJ software, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA). On day 23, bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) was performed and BAL fluid (BALF) was recovered for eosinophils enumeration and also IL‐4 and IL‐13 level measurements by ELISA. Blood samples and lung specimens were collected to measure the serum level of anti‐Der f IgE and perform the histopathological examination, respectively. Furthermore, mouse fecal samples were collected to isolate microbial genomic DNA using a NucleoSpin® DNA Stool® Kit, and 16S rRNA gene sequencing was performed following procedures described by Shen et al.9 Data are presented as the mean ± SEM, and statistical comparisons among the treatment groups were performed with the use of one‐way ANOVA test followed by the nonparametric Tukey test, whereas the abundance of bacterial genes was compared using Student's t test (SPSS software package). Detailed methodology is provided in [Link], [Link], [Link]. As results, simultaneous exposure of wild‐type mice to TCS and Der f induced: An increase in the production of anti‐Der f IgE, IL‐4, and IL‐13 (Figure 1D‐B‐E), which resulted in the aggravation of airway hyperresponsiveness in aeroallergen‐exposed wild type mice (Figure 1A), whereas these changes were not observed in non‐sensitized mice;
Figure 1

Induction of airway inflammation and hyperresponsiveness, eosinophil count, serum anti‐Der f IgE level, and BAL fluid levels of IL‐4 and IL‐13 in wild‐type BALB/c mice. Airway hyperresponsiveness was induced using acetylcholine (ACh). Normal mice group received PBS, whereas the allergen‐exposed mice groups received either Der f only (Der f group), Der f + diesel‐exhausted particles (asthma group), or Der f + triclosan (wild‐type + Der f + 5 mg/kg triclosan group, wild‐type + Der f + 50 mg/kg triclosan group, wild‐type + Der f + 500 mg/kg triclosan group). In wild‐type mice, AHR was significantly increased by simultaneous exposure to triclosan and Der f in comparison with wild‐type + Der f mice (P < 0.01). The area under the curve (AUC) for the dose‐response to ACh (range: 62.5–2000 mg/kg); # # P < 0.01 vs wild‐type + Der f group (A). In addition, significantly higher serum anti‐Der f IgE titers were observed in all triclosan‐treated sensitized mice groups (5, 50, 500 mg/kg) as compared with wild‐type + Der f group (P < 0.01, P < 0.05, and P < 0.05, respectively) (B). Furthermore, the number of eosinophils in BALF was significantly higher in of triclosan‐treated mice groups (50 mg/kg triclosan and 500 mg/kg triclosan) than in wild‐type + Der f mice group (P < 0.05) (C). The BALF levels of IL‐4 (D) and IL‐13 (D) (5, 50, 500 mg/kg) in triclosan‐treated mice were significantly higher than those in wild‐type + Der f mice (P < 0.05, P < 0.05, and P < 0.01, respectively). The results represent the mean ± SEM of data from each group; # P < 0.05 vs wild‐type + Der f. # # P < 0.01 vs wild‐type + Der f [Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]

Induction of airway inflammation and hyperresponsiveness, eosinophil count, serum anti‐Der f IgE level, and BAL fluid levels of IL‐4 and IL‐13 in wild‐type BALB/c mice. Airway hyperresponsiveness was induced using acetylcholine (ACh). Normal mice group received PBS, whereas the allergen‐exposed mice groups received either Der f only (Der f group), Der f + diesel‐exhausted particles (asthma group), or Der f + triclosan (wild‐type + Der f + 5 mg/kg triclosan group, wild‐type + Der f + 50 mg/kg triclosan group, wild‐type + Der f + 500 mg/kg triclosan group). In wild‐type mice, AHR was significantly increased by simultaneous exposure to triclosan and Der f in comparison with wild‐type + Der f mice (P < 0.01). The area under the curve (AUC) for the dose‐response to ACh (range: 62.5–2000 mg/kg); # # P < 0.01 vs wild‐type + Der f group (A). In addition, significantly higher serum anti‐Der f IgE titers were observed in all triclosan‐treated sensitized mice groups (5, 50, 500 mg/kg) as compared with wild‐type + Der f group (P < 0.01, P < 0.05, and P < 0.05, respectively) (B). Furthermore, the number of eosinophils in BALF was significantly higher in of triclosan‐treated mice groups (50 mg/kg triclosan and 500 mg/kg triclosan) than in wild‐type + Der f mice group (P < 0.05) (C). The BALF levels of IL‐4 (D) and IL‐13 (D) (5, 50, 500 mg/kg) in triclosan‐treated mice were significantly higher than those in wild‐type + Der f mice (P < 0.05, P < 0.05, and P < 0.01, respectively). The results represent the mean ± SEM of data from each group; # P < 0.05 vs wild‐type + Der f. # # P < 0.01 vs wild‐type + Der f [Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com] Increased collagen deposition and infiltration of inflammatory cells (eosinophils) in the lungs of aeroallergen‐exposed wild type mice as shown in Figure 1C; Goblet cell hyperplasia in the lungs of sensitized wild type mice, whereas, in contrast, TLR‐2 (−/−) mice did not show any allergic response after exposure to TCS (Figure 2A).
Figure 2

Histopathological images of lung specimens and taxonomic profiles of microbial communities in gut microbiota. The figure shows [1] representative photomicrographs at 10 times magnification (inset) of HE (histology) (A (a‐f)), PAS (mucin) (A (g‐l)), MT (fibrosis) (A (m‐r)) staining of mouse lung specimens obtained 23 d after the intratracheal instillation of Der f. BALB/cJ mice were randomly divided into six groups (n = 36) and treated with saline (normal group) (A (a, g, m)) or 4 μg Der f (A (b, h, n)), or Der f + triclosan (5 mg/kg (A (c, i, o)), 50 mg/kg (A (d, j, p)), 500 mg/kg (A (e, k, q)) and Der f + DEP (asthma) (A (f, l, r)). The triclosan‐treated mice (A (c‐e, i‐k, o‐q)) showed a marked increase in goblet cell hyperplasia, eosinophil infiltration, and the numbers of PAS‐positive cells and collagen fibers in the lung. Black arrows indicate representative eosinophils in the infiltrate (A (c, d, e, f)), yellow arrows indicate PAS‐positive cells (A (i, j, k, l)), green arrows indicate subepithelial fibrosis (A (o, p, q, r)), magnification 10x. Abbreviations: AL, alveolus; BR, bronchiole; V, blood vessel; G, goblet cell hyperplasia; [2] the relative abundance of gut microbial species (B,C), and the proportions of Treg cells, defined as CD4+ CD25‐high FOXP3+ T cells (D). The copy numbers of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene of c_Deltaproteobacteria, c_Clostridia, and c_Erysipelotrichi in triclosan‐treated Der f‐exposed mice increased in a dose‐dependent manner. In contrast, the copy number of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene of c_Bacteroidia decreased (B,C). No significant difference was observed in terms of proportions of Treg cells, defined as CD4+ CD25‐high FOXP3+ T cells (D)

Histopathological images of lung specimens and taxonomic profiles of microbial communities in gut microbiota. The figure shows [1] representative photomicrographs at 10 times magnification (inset) of HE (histology) (A (a‐f)), PAS (mucin) (A (g‐l)), MT (fibrosis) (A (m‐r)) staining of mouse lung specimens obtained 23 d after the intratracheal instillation of Der f. BALB/cJ mice were randomly divided into six groups (n = 36) and treated with saline (normal group) (A (a, g, m)) or 4 μg Der f (A (b, h, n)), or Der f + triclosan (5 mg/kg (A (c, i, o)), 50 mg/kg (A (d, j, p)), 500 mg/kg (A (e, k, q)) and Der f + DEP (asthma) (A (f, l, r)). The triclosan‐treated mice (A (c‐e, i‐k, o‐q)) showed a marked increase in goblet cell hyperplasia, eosinophil infiltration, and the numbers of PAS‐positive cells and collagen fibers in the lung. Black arrows indicate representative eosinophils in the infiltrate (A (c, d, e, f)), yellow arrows indicate PAS‐positive cells (A (i, j, k, l)), green arrows indicate subepithelial fibrosis (A (o, p, q, r)), magnification 10x. Abbreviations: AL, alveolus; BR, bronchiole; V, blood vessel; G, goblet cell hyperplasia; [2] the relative abundance of gut microbial species (B,C), and the proportions of Treg cells, defined as CD4+ CD25‐high FOXP3+ T cells (D). The copy numbers of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene of c_Deltaproteobacteria, c_Clostridia, and c_Erysipelotrichi in triclosan‐treated Der f‐exposed mice increased in a dose‐dependent manner. In contrast, the copy number of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene of c_Bacteroidia decreased (B,C). No significant difference was observed in terms of proportions of Treg cells, defined as CD4+ CD25‐high FOXP3+ T cells (D) On the other hand, regarding the mouse microbial community analysis, the copy numbers of bacterial 16S rRNA gene of c_Deltaproteobacteria, c_Clostridia, and c_Erysipelotrichi in TCS‐treated Der f‐sensitized mice increased in a dose‐dependent manner, whereas it markedly decreased in c_Bacteroidia (Figure 2B‐C). Furthermore, for peripheral blood Treg cells (CD4+ CD25‐high FOXP3+ T cells), no significant difference was observed among mice groups (Figure 2D). This study showed that a simultaneous exposure to TCS and environmental aeroallergen induced an increased production of IL‐4, IL‐13, which are representatives Th‐2 cytokines associated with allergic response, and anti‐Der f IgE. Additionally, a perturbation of gut microbiome, an intense eosinophilic infiltration, and goblet cell hyperplasia, one of the prominent features of animal models of atopic asthma consecutive to repeated challenges with an allergen, were observed. Our experiments were performed in duplicate, and the primary animal study showed high levels of the representative Th‐2 cytokines, including IL‐5, in the BALF of TCS and Der f‐exposed animals; but the latter was not measured in the secondary experiments due to insufficient BALF samples. This constitutes a limitation for this work. Taken together, findings from this study indicate that exposure to TCS and aeroallergen exposure induces and/or aggravates AHR and inflammation and that there is a possible relationship between TCS‐induced aggravation of AHR and the perturbation of gut microbiome in aeroallergen‐sensitized mice. This suggests that TCS might play an adjuvant role in the induction or aggravation of allergic response in susceptible individuals.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest. Click here for additional data file. Click here for additional data file. Click here for additional data file.
  9 in total

1.  Direct inhibition of arginase attenuated airway allergic reactions and inflammation in a Dermatophagoides farinae-induced NC/Nga mouse model.

Authors:  Noriko Takahashi; Keiki Ogino; Kei Takemoto; Seiji Hamanishi; Da-Hong Wang; Tomoko Takigawa; Masafumi Shibamori; Hironobu Ishiyama; Yoshihisa Fujikura
Journal:  Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol       Date:  2010-04-09       Impact factor: 5.464

2.  Say Goodbye to Some Antibacterials.

Authors:  Rebecca Voelker
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  MICROBIOME. Is triclosan harming your microbiome?

Authors:  Alyson L Yee; Jack A Gilbert
Journal:  Science       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 4.  Triclosan exposure, transformation, and human health effects.

Authors:  Lisa M Weatherly; Julie A Gosse
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 6.393

5.  Urinary levels of triclosan and parabens are associated with aeroallergen and food sensitization.

Authors:  Jessica H Savage; Elizabeth C Matsui; Robert A Wood; Corinne A Keet
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 10.793

6.  Exposure to triclosan augments the allergic response to ovalbumin in a mouse model of asthma.

Authors:  Stacey E Anderson; Jennifer Franko; Michael L Kashon; Katie L Anderson; Ann F Hubbs; Ewa Lukomska; B Jean Meade
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 4.849

7.  The impact of bisphenol A and triclosan on immune parameters in the U.S. population, NHANES 2003-2006.

Authors:  Erin M Rees Clayton; Megan Todd; Jennifer Beam Dowd; Allison E Aiello
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2010-11-29       Impact factor: 9.031

8.  Household triclosan and triclocarban effects on the infant and maternal microbiome.

Authors:  Jessica V Ribado; Catherine Ley; Thomas D Haggerty; Ekaterina Tkachenko; Ami S Bhatt; Julie Parsonnet
Journal:  EMBO Mol Med       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 12.137

9.  Anti-obesity Effect of Capsaicin in Mice Fed with High-Fat Diet Is Associated with an Increase in Population of the Gut Bacterium Akkermansia muciniphila.

Authors:  Wei Shen; Mengyu Shen; Xia Zhao; Hongbin Zhu; Yuhui Yang; Shuguang Lu; Yinling Tan; Gang Li; Ming Li; Jing Wang; Fuquan Hu; Shuai Le
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 5.640

  9 in total
  6 in total

Review 1.  The External Exposome and Food Allergy.

Authors:  Timothy P Moran
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2020-06-06       Impact factor: 4.806

2.  Dermal Exposure to the Immunomodulatory Antimicrobial Chemical Triclosan Alters the Skin Barrier Integrity and Microbiome in Mice.

Authors:  Rachel Baur; Jasleen Gandhi; Nikki B Marshall; Ewa Lukomska; Lisa M Weatherly; Hillary L Shane; Gangqing Hu; Stacey E Anderson
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2021-11-24       Impact factor: 4.849

3.  Exposure to paraben and triclosan and allergic diseases in Tokyo: A pilot cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Motoko Mitsui-Iwama; Kiwako Yamamoto-Hanada; Yuma Fukutomi; Ryoji Hirota; Go Muto; Takeshi Nakamura; Takahiro Yoshikawa; Hiroyuki Nakamura; Masashi Mikami; Ichiro Morioka; Yukihiro Ohya
Journal:  Asia Pac Allergy       Date:  2019-01-21

Review 4.  The Impact of Early-Life Exposure to Antimicrobials on Asthma and Eczema Risk in Children.

Authors:  Medina S Jackson-Browne; Noelle Henderson; Marisa Patti; Adam Spanier; Joseph M Braun
Journal:  Curr Environ Health Rep       Date:  2019-12

5.  Altered vaginal microbiome and relative co-abundance network in pregnant women with penicillin allergy.

Authors:  Xiaohua Li; Jun Luo; Chuan Nie; Qingxia Li; Xiaofeng Sun; Hongping Li; Yong Zhang
Journal:  Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 3.406

6.  The Effect of Early Life Exposure to Triclosan on Thyroid Follicles and Hormone Levels in Zebrafish.

Authors:  Ning Tang; Pianpian Fan; Li Chen; Xiaogang Yu; Wenjuan Wang; Weiye Wang; Fengxiu Ouyang
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-06-03       Impact factor: 6.055

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.