Anjana Muralidharan1, Clayton H Brown1, Jason E Peer1, Elizabeth A Klingaman1, Samantha M Hack1, Lan Li1, Mary Brighid Walsh1, Richard W Goldberg1. 1. Mental Illness, Research, Education and Clinical Center (MIRECC), Veterans Affairs (VA) Capitol Health Care Network (Veterans Integrated Service Network [VISN] 5), Baltimore (Muralidharan, Brown, Klingaman, Hack, Walsh, Goldberg); Division of Psychiatric Services Research, Department of Psychiatry (Muralidharan, Klingaman, Li, Goldberg), and Department of Epidemiology and Public Health (Brown), all at University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore; VA Maryland Healthcare System, Baltimore (Peer); University of Maryland School of Social Work, Baltimore (Hack).
Abstract
OBJECTIVE:Many adults with serious mental illness have significant medical illness burden and poor illness self-management. In this study, the authors examined Living Well, a group-based illness self-management intervention for adults with serious mental illness that was cofacilitated by two providers, one of whom has lived experience with co-occurring mental health and medical conditions. METHODS:Adults with serious mental illness (N=242) were randomly assigned to Living Well or an active control condition. Participants completed assessments of quality of life; health attitudes; self-management behaviors; and symptoms at baseline, posttreatment, and follow-up. Emergency room use was assessed by means of chart review. Mixed-effects models examined group × time interactions on outcomes. RESULTS: Compared with the control group, adults in Living Well had greater improvements at posttreatment in mental health-related quality of life (t=2.15, p=.032), self-management self-efficacy (t=4.10, p<.001), patient activation (t=2.08, p=.038), internal health locus of control (t=2.01, p=.045), behavioral and cognitive symptom management (t=2.77, p=.006), and overall psychiatric symptoms (t=-2.02, p=.044); they had greater improvements at follow-up in physical activity-related self-management (t=2.55, p=.011) and relationship quality (t=-2.45, p=.015). No effects were found for emergency room use. The control group exhibited greater increases in physical health-related quality of life at posttreatment (t=-2.23, p=.026). Significant group differences in self-management self-efficacy (t=2.86,p=.004) and behavioral and cognitive symptom management (t=2.08, p= .038) were maintained at follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with an active control group, a peer-cofacilitated illness self-management group was more effective in improving quality of life and self-management self-efficacy among adults with serious mental illness.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: Many adults with serious mental illness have significant medical illness burden and poor illness self-management. In this study, the authors examined Living Well, a group-based illness self-management intervention for adults with serious mental illness that was cofacilitated by two providers, one of whom has lived experience with co-occurring mental health and medical conditions. METHODS: Adults with serious mental illness (N=242) were randomly assigned to Living Well or an active control condition. Participants completed assessments of quality of life; health attitudes; self-management behaviors; and symptoms at baseline, posttreatment, and follow-up. Emergency room use was assessed by means of chart review. Mixed-effects models examined group × time interactions on outcomes. RESULTS: Compared with the control group, adults in Living Well had greater improvements at posttreatment in mental health-related quality of life (t=2.15, p=.032), self-management self-efficacy (t=4.10, p<.001), patient activation (t=2.08, p=.038), internal health locus of control (t=2.01, p=.045), behavioral and cognitive symptom management (t=2.77, p=.006), and overall psychiatric symptoms (t=-2.02, p=.044); they had greater improvements at follow-up in physical activity-related self-management (t=2.55, p=.011) and relationship quality (t=-2.45, p=.015). No effects were found for emergency room use. The control group exhibited greater increases in physical health-related quality of life at posttreatment (t=-2.23, p=.026). Significant group differences in self-management self-efficacy (t=2.86,p=.004) and behavioral and cognitive symptom management (t=2.08, p= .038) were maintained at follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with an active control group, a peer-cofacilitated illness self-management group was more effective in improving quality of life and self-management self-efficacy among adults with serious mental illness.
Entities:
Keywords:
health and wellness; illness self-management; peer-delivered intervention; serious mental illness
Authors: Joshua Chodosh; Sally C Morton; Walter Mojica; Margaret Maglione; Marika J Suttorp; Lara Hilton; Shannon Rhodes; Paul Shekelle Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2005-09-20 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Benjamin G Druss; Manasvini Singh; Silke A von Esenwein; Gretl E Glick; Stephanie Tapscott; Sherry Jenkins Tucker; Cathy A Lally; Evelina W Sterling Journal: Psychiatr Serv Date: 2018-02-01 Impact factor: 3.084
Authors: I M Cameron; L Cunningham; J R Crawford; J M Eagles; S V Eisen; K Lawton; S A Naji; R J Hamilton Journal: Int J Psychiatry Clin Pract Date: 2007 Impact factor: 1.812