OBJECTIVE:Individuals with serious mental illnesses have high rates of general medical comorbidity and challenges in managing these conditions. A growing workforce of certified peer specialists is available to help these individuals more effectively manage their health and health care. However, few studies have examined the effectiveness of peer-led programs for self-management of general medical conditions for this population. METHODS: This randomized study enrolled 400 participants with a serious mental illness and one or more chronic general medical conditions across three community mental health clinics. Participants were randomly assigned to the Health and Recovery Peer (HARP) program, a self-management program for general medical conditions led by certified peer specialists (N=198), or to usual care (N=202). Assessments were conducted at baseline and three and six months. RESULTS: At six months, participants in the intervention group demonstrated a significant differential improvement in the primary study outcome, health-related quality of life. Specifically, compared with the usual care group, intervention participants had greater improvement in the Short-Form Health Survey physical component summary (an increase of 2.7 versus 1.4 points, p=.046) and mental component summary (4.6 versus 2.5 points, p=.039). Significantly greater six-month improvements in mental health recovery were seen for the intervention group (p=.02), but no other between-group differences in secondary outcome measures were significant. CONCLUSIONS: The HARP program was associated with improved physical health- and mental health-related quality of life among individuals with serious mental illness and comorbid general medical conditions, suggesting the potential benefits of more widespread dissemination of peer-led disease self-management in this population.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: Individuals with serious mental illnesses have high rates of general medical comorbidity and challenges in managing these conditions. A growing workforce of certified peer specialists is available to help these individuals more effectively manage their health and health care. However, few studies have examined the effectiveness of peer-led programs for self-management of general medical conditions for this population. METHODS: This randomized study enrolled 400 participants with a serious mental illness and one or more chronic general medical conditions across three community mental health clinics. Participants were randomly assigned to the Health and Recovery Peer (HARP) program, a self-management program for general medical conditions led by certified peer specialists (N=198), or to usual care (N=202). Assessments were conducted at baseline and three and six months. RESULTS: At six months, participants in the intervention group demonstrated a significant differential improvement in the primary study outcome, health-related quality of life. Specifically, compared with the usual care group, intervention participants had greater improvement in the Short-Form Health Survey physical component summary (an increase of 2.7 versus 1.4 points, p=.046) and mental component summary (4.6 versus 2.5 points, p=.039). Significantly greater six-month improvements in mental health recovery were seen for the intervention group (p=.02), but no other between-group differences in secondary outcome measures were significant. CONCLUSIONS: The HARP program was associated with improved physical health- and mental health-related quality of life among individuals with serious mental illness and comorbid general medical conditions, suggesting the potential benefits of more widespread dissemination of peer-led disease self-management in this population.
Entities:
Keywords:
Medical morbidity and mortality in psychiatric patients; Public-sector psychiatry; peer specialists; self-management; serious mental illness
Authors: Amy M Kilbourne; Michelle M Barbaresso; Zongshan Lai; Kristina M Nord; Margretta Bramlet; David E Goodrich; Edward P Post; Daniel Almirall; Mark S Bauer Journal: J Clin Psychiatry Date: 2017-01 Impact factor: 4.384
Authors: Kimberley Krapek; Kathleen King; Susan S Warren; Karen G George; Dorothy A Caputo; Karen Mihelich; Elizabeth M Holst; Michael B Nichol; Sheng G Shi; Kevin B Livengood; Steve Walden; Teresa J Lubowski Journal: Ann Pharmacother Date: 2004-07-06 Impact factor: 3.154
Authors: Richard W Goldberg; Faith Dickerson; Alicia Lucksted; Clayton H Brown; Elyssa Weber; Wendy N Tenhula; Julie Kreyenbuhl; Lisa B Dixon Journal: Psychiatr Serv Date: 2013-01 Impact factor: 3.084
Authors: Karen L Fortuna; Joelle Ferron; Sarah I Pratt; Anjana Muralidharan; Kelly A Aschbrenner; Ashley M Williams; Patricia E Deegan; Mark Salzer Journal: Psychiatr Q Date: 2019-09
Authors: Karen L Fortuna; Kelly A Aschbrenner; Matthew C Lohman; Jessica Brooks; Mark Salzer; Robert Walker; Lisa St George; Stephen J Bartels Journal: Psychiatr Q Date: 2018-12
Authors: Anjana Muralidharan; Clayton H Brown; Jason E Peer; Elizabeth A Klingaman; Samantha M Hack; Lan Li; Mary Brighid Walsh; Richard W Goldberg Journal: Psychiatr Serv Date: 2018-10-24 Impact factor: 3.084
Authors: Osnat C Melamed; Indira Fernando; Sophie Soklaridis; Margaret K Hahn; Kirk W LeMessurier; Valerie H Taylor Journal: Can J Psychiatry Date: 2019-07-14 Impact factor: 4.356
Authors: Karen L Fortuna; Maria Venegas; Emre Umucu; George Mois; Robert Walker; Jessica M Brooks Journal: Curr Treat Options Psychiatry Date: 2019-06-20