Literature DB >> 30353494

The influence of stress on attentional bias to threat: An angry face and a noisy crowd.

Heidi A Rued1, Clayton J Hilmert2, Anna M Strahm1, Laura E Thomas1.   

Abstract

During stress, attentional capture by threatening stimuli may be particularly adaptive. Individuals are more efficient at identifying threatening faces in a crowd than identifying nonthreatening faces (e.g., Öhman et al., Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130(3): 466-478, 2001a, Öhman et al., Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(3): 381-396, 2001b). However, under conditions of stress, when attention to threat may be most critical, cognitive processes are generally disrupted. The present study explored the attentional advantage of threatening stimuli under stressful conditions. We exposed participants to either high or low stress conditions during a visual search task displaying threatening and nonthreatening facial targets among distractors. Participants' accuracy, reaction times, and self-reported stress were measured. Stress introduced a speed-accuracy trade-off: participants in the high-stress condition were faster, but less accurate, than participants in the low-stress condition. Although both groups of participants showed relative performance advantages in detecting threatening compared with nonthreatening stimuli, this advantage was markedly larger for participants in the high-stress condition. This suggests that the established stress-mediated increase in the activity of the ventral neural network responsible for the reorienting of attention may have enhanced the ability to detect threatening stimuli or buffered the disruptive effects of stress on this process. Our findings highlight the potentially adaptive nature of stress disruption on attentional processes and align research on the anger superiority effect and automated attentional processes under stress.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attentional capture; Reaction time analysis; Stress; Visual search

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30353494      PMCID: PMC6582642          DOI: 10.3758/s13423-018-1538-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  22 in total

Review 1.  Emotion circuits in the brain.

Authors:  J E LeDoux
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 12.449

Review 2.  Stress impairs prefrontal cortical function in rats and monkeys: role of dopamine D1 and norepinephrine alpha-1 receptor mechanisms.

Authors:  A F Arnsten
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.453

Review 3.  Arousal, activation, and effort in the control of attention.

Authors:  K H Pribram; D McGuinness
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1975-03       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  Emotion drives attention: detecting the snake in the grass.

Authors:  A Ohman; A Flykt; F Esteves
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2001-09

5.  Lesions of the human amygdala impair enhanced perception of emotionally salient events.

Authors:  A K Anderson; E A Phelps
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-05-17       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Neural response to emotional faces with and without awareness: event-related fMRI in a parietal patient with visual extinction and spatial neglect.

Authors:  P Vuilleumier; J L Armony; K Clarke; M Husain; J Driver; R J Dolan
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: an attentional blink? .

Authors:  J E Raymond; K L Shapiro; K M Arnell
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Cognitive, social, and physiological determinants of emotional state.

Authors:  S SCHACHTER; J E SINGER
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1962-09       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  The face in the crowd revisited: a threat advantage with schematic stimuli.

Authors:  A Ohman; D Lundqvist; F Esteves
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2001-03

10.  A direct brainstem-amygdala-cortical 'alarm' system for subliminal signals of fear.

Authors:  Belinda J Liddell; Kerri J Brown; Andrew H Kemp; Matthew J Barton; Pritha Das; Anthony Peduto; Evian Gordon; Leanne M Williams
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2005-01-01       Impact factor: 6.556

View more
  1 in total

1.  A Combination of Green Tea, Rhodiola, Magnesium, and B Vitamins Increases Electroencephalogram Theta Activity During Attentional Task Performance Under Conditions of Induced Social Stress.

Authors:  Neil Bernard Boyle; Louise Dye; Clare Louise Lawton; Jac Billington
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2022-07-22
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.