Adrian D K Le1,2, Lawrence Enweze1, Malcolm R DeBaun1, Jason L Dragoo3. 1. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Stanford University, 450 Broadway St, Redwood City, CA, USA. 2. Lifemark Health Group, Toronto, ON, Canada. 3. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Stanford University, 450 Broadway St, Redwood City, CA, USA. jdragoo@stanford.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review evaluates current clinical literature on the use of platelet-rich plasma (PRP), including leukocyte-rich PRP (LR-PRP) and leukocyte-poor PRP (LP-PRP), in order to develop evidence-based recommendations for various musculoskeletal indications. RECENT FINDINGS: Abundant high-quality evidence supports the use of LR-PRP injection for lateral epicondylitis and LP-PRP for osteoarthritis of the knee. Moderate high-quality evidence supports the use of LR-PRP injection for patellar tendinopathy and of PRP injection for plantar fasciitis and donor site pain in patellar tendon graft BTB ACL reconstruction. There is insufficient evidence to routinely recommend PRP for rotator cuff tendinopathy, osteoarthritis of the hip, or high ankle sprains. Current evidence demonstrates a lack of efficacy of PRP for Achilles tendinopathy, muscle injuries, acute fracture or nonunion, surgical augmentation in rotator cuff repair, Achilles tendon repair, and ACL reconstruction. PRP is a promising treatment for some musculoskeletal diseases; however, evidence of its efficacy has been highly variable depending on the specific indication. Additional high-quality clinical trials with longer follow-up will be critical in shaping our perspective of this treatment option.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review evaluates current clinical literature on the use of platelet-rich plasma (PRP), including leukocyte-rich PRP (LR-PRP) and leukocyte-poor PRP (LP-PRP), in order to develop evidence-based recommendations for various musculoskeletal indications. RECENT FINDINGS: Abundant high-quality evidence supports the use of LR-PRP injection for lateral epicondylitis and LP-PRP for osteoarthritis of the knee. Moderate high-quality evidence supports the use of LR-PRP injection for patellar tendinopathy and of PRP injection for plantar fasciitis and donor site pain in patellar tendon graft BTB ACL reconstruction. There is insufficient evidence to routinely recommend PRP for rotator cuff tendinopathy, osteoarthritis of the hip, or high ankle sprains. Current evidence demonstrates a lack of efficacy of PRP for Achilles tendinopathy, muscle injuries, acute fracture or nonunion, surgical augmentation in rotator cuff repair, Achilles tendon repair, and ACL reconstruction. PRP is a promising treatment for some musculoskeletal diseases; however, evidence of its efficacy has been highly variable depending on the specific indication. Additional high-quality clinical trials with longer follow-up will be critical in shaping our perspective of this treatment option.
Authors: Mario Vetrano; Anna Castorina; Maria Chiara Vulpiani; Rossella Baldini; Antonio Pavan; Andrea Ferretti Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2013-02-13 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Elvira Montañez-Heredia; Sofia Irízar; Pedro J Huertas; Esperanza Otero; Marta Del Valle; Isidro Prat; Macarena S Díaz-Gallardo; Macarena Perán; Juan A Marchal; María Del Carmen Hernandez-Lamas Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2016-07-02 Impact factor: 5.923
Authors: Neal L Millar; Karin G Silbernagel; Kristian Thorborg; Paul D Kirwan; Leesa M Galatz; Geoffrey D Abrams; George A C Murrell; Iain B McInnes; Scott A Rodeo Journal: Nat Rev Dis Primers Date: 2021-01-07 Impact factor: 52.329
Authors: Kristen Mathias; Abhimanyu Amarnani; Neha Pal; Jay Karri; Daniel Arkfeld; Jonathan M Hagedorn; Alaa Abd-Elsayed Journal: Curr Pain Headache Rep Date: 2021-07-16