Literature DB >> 30353241

Surgical techniques for advanced transverse colon cancer using the pincer approach of the transverse mesocolon.

Hiroyuki Egi1, Ikki Nakashima2, Minoru Hattori3, Shoichiro Mukai2, Masatoshi Kochi2, Kazuhiro Taguchi2, Haruki Sada2, Yusuke Sumi2, Hideki Ohdan2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer, not only early cancer but also advanced cancer, has become standardized by some randomized controlled studies. However, cases involving advanced transverse colon cancer were excluded from these studies due to the technical difficulty of the surgery. Hence, laparoscopic surgery for advanced transverse colon cancer is still a theme that we need to overcome. To solve these issues, it is necessary to establish a standardized approach and surgical technique. SURGICAL TECHNIQUES: The advantage of our method, which approaches from both sides of the transverse mesocolon, is that it is easier to achieve hemostasis when active bleeding occurs because this approach provides space for ligating and sealing. This allows the surgeon to perform lymphadenectomy around the superior mesenteric artery and vein.
CONCLUSIONS: We introduced the usefulness of the "Pincer approach of the transverse mesocolon" to standardize laparoscopic surgery for advanced transverse colon cancer.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colon cancer; Laparoscopic surgery; Pincer approach; Transverse colon cancer

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30353241     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-018-6491-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  10 in total

1.  Five-year follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of laparoscopically assisted versus open surgery for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  D G Jayne; H C Thorpe; J Copeland; P Quirke; J M Brown; P J Guillou
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Survival outcomes following laparoscopic versus open D3 dissection for stage II or III colon cancer (JCOG0404): a phase 3, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Seigo Kitano; Masafumi Inomata; Junki Mizusawa; Hiroshi Katayama; Masahiko Watanabe; Seiichiro Yamamoto; Masaaki Ito; Shuji Saito; Shoichi Fujii; Fumio Konishi; Yoshihisa Saida; Hirotoshi Hasegawa; Tomonori Akagi; Kenichi Sugihara; Takashi Yamaguchi; Tadahiko Masaki; Yosuke Fukunaga; Kohei Murata; Masazumi Okajima; Yoshihiro Moriya; Yasuhiro Shimada
Journal:  Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2017-02-02

3.  Cranially approached radical lymph node dissection around the middle colic vessels in laparoscopic colon cancer surgery.

Authors:  Takeru Matsuda; Takeshi Iwasaki; Masaaki Mitsutsuji; Kenro Hirata; Yoko Maekawa; Daisuke Tsugawa; Yutaka Sugita; Yasuo Sumi; Etsuji Shimada; Yoshihiro Kakeji
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 3.445

4.  Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial.

Authors:  Mark Buunen; Ruben Veldkamp; Wim C J Hop; Esther Kuhry; Johannes Jeekel; Eva Haglind; Lars Påhlman; Miguel A Cuesta; Simon Msika; Mario Morino; Antonio Lacy; Hendrik J Bonjer
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2008-12-13       Impact factor: 41.316

5.  Laparoscopic colectomy for transverse colon carcinoma: a surgical challenge but oncologically feasible.

Authors:  J M Fernández-Cebrián; P Gil Yonte; M Jimenez-Toscano; L Vega; F Ochando
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.788

Review 6.  A systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the role of laparoscopic surgical resection of transverse colon tumours.

Authors:  M Chand; M R S Siddiqui; S Rasheed; G Brown; P Tekkis; A Parvaiz; T Qureshi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  The long-term results of a randomized clinical trial of laparoscopy-assisted versus open surgery for colon cancer.

Authors:  Antonio M Lacy; Salvadora Delgado; Antoni Castells; Hubert A Prins; Vicente Arroyo; Ainitze Ibarzabal; Josep M Pique
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST Study Group trial.

Authors:  James Fleshman; Daniel J Sargent; Erin Green; Mehran Anvari; Steven J Stryker; Robert W Beart; Michael Hellinger; Richard Flanagan; Walter Peters; Heidi Nelson
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Randomized trial of laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma: 3-year results of the UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group.

Authors:  David G Jayne; Pierre J Guillou; Helen Thorpe; Philip Quirke; Joanne Copeland; Adrian M H Smith; Richard M Heath; Julia M Brown
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-07-20       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Ten-year outcomes of a randomised trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for colon cancer.

Authors:  Charlotte L Deijen; Jeanine E Vasmel; Elly S M de Lange-de Klerk; Miguel A Cuesta; Peter-Paul L O Coene; Johan F Lange; W J H Jeroen Meijerink; Jack J Jakimowicz; Johannes Jeekel; Geert Kazemier; Ignace M C Janssen; Lars Påhlman; Eva Haglind; H Jaap Bonjer
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 4.584

  10 in total
  2 in total

1.  Efficacy and Safety of rCCK96-104PE38 Targeted Drug in the General Surgical Treatment of Colon Cancer.

Authors:  Wenbin Cao; Bo Zhang; Yang Liu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 3.246

2.  Laparoscopic resection surgery for malignant transformation of extragonadal endometriosis by the "pincer" approach.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Kanao; Mai Nishimura; Atsushi Murakami
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 4.756

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.