Literature DB >> 28404155

Survival outcomes following laparoscopic versus open D3 dissection for stage II or III colon cancer (JCOG0404): a phase 3, randomised controlled trial.

Seigo Kitano1, Masafumi Inomata2, Junki Mizusawa3, Hiroshi Katayama3, Masahiko Watanabe4, Seiichiro Yamamoto5, Masaaki Ito6, Shuji Saito7, Shoichi Fujii8, Fumio Konishi9, Yoshihisa Saida10, Hirotoshi Hasegawa11, Tomonori Akagi1, Kenichi Sugihara12, Takashi Yamaguchi13, Tadahiko Masaki14, Yosuke Fukunaga15, Kohei Murata16, Masazumi Okajima17, Yoshihiro Moriya5, Yasuhiro Shimada18.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although benefits of laparoscopic surgery compared with open surgery have been suggested, the long-term survival of patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer requiring Japanese D3 dissection remains unclear. We did a randomised controlled trial to establish non-inferiority of laparoscopic surgery to open surgery.
METHODS: We did an open-label, multi-institutional, randomised, two-arm phase 3 trial in 30 hospitals in Japan. Patients aged 20-75 years who had histologically proven colon cancer; tumours located in the caecum or ascending, sigmoid, or rectosigmoid colon; T3 or deeper lesions without involvement of other organs, node stages N0-2, and metastasis stage M0; and tumour size of 8 cm or smaller were included. Only accredited surgeons did surgery as an operator or instructor. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) preoperatively to undergo D3 resection either by an open route or a laparoscopic route, via phone call or fax to the Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG) Data Center. Randomisation used a minimisation method with a biased-coin assignment according to tumour location (caecum, ascending vs sigmoid, rectosigmoid) and institution. The primary endpoint was overall survival and was analysed by intention to treat. The non-inferiority margin for the hazard ratio (HR) was set at 1·366. This study is registered with UMIN Clinical Trials Registry, number C000000105, and ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00147134.
FINDINGS: Between Oct 1, 2004, and March 27, 2009, 1057 patients were randomly assigned to either open surgery (n=528) or laparoscopic surgery (n=529). 5-year overall survival was 90·4% (95% CI 87·5-92·6) for open surgery and 91·8% (89·1-93·8) for laparoscopic surgery. Laparoscopic D3 surgery was not non-inferior to open surgery for overall survival (HR 1·06, 90% CI 0·79-1·41; pnon-inferiority=0·073). 65 (13%) patients in the open surgery group and 53 (10%) patients in the laparoscopic surgery group had grade 2-4 adverse events. Grade 2-4 adverse events included diarrhoea (15 [3%] in the open surgery group vs 14 [3%] in the laparoscopic surgery group), paralytic ileus (six [1%] vs nine [2%]), and small intestine bowel obstruction (16 [3%] vs 11 [2%]). Two treatment-related deaths occurred in the open surgery group: one patient died 7 days after surgery (probably due to myocardial infarction), and one patient died from febrile neutropenia, pneumonia, diarrhoea, and gastrointestinal haemorrhage during postoperative chemotherapy.
INTERPRETATION: Laparoscopic D3 surgery was not non-inferior to open D3 surgery in terms of overall survival for patients with stage II or III colon cancer. However, because overall survival in both groups was similar and better than expected, laparoscopic D3 surgery could be an acceptable treatment option for patients with stage II or III colon cancer. FUNDING: National Cancer Center Research and Development Fund, Grant-in-Aid for Cancer Research, and Health and Labour Sciences Research Grant for Clinical Cancer Research from the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28404155     DOI: 10.1016/S2468-1253(16)30207-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol


  61 in total

1.  Laparoscopic vs. Open Surgery for Stage II/III Colon Cancer Patients With Body Mass Index >25 kg/m2.

Authors:  Keisuke Kazama; Masakatsu Numata; Toru Aoyama; Atsushi Onodeara; Kentaro Hara; Yosuke Atsumi; Hiroshi Tamagawa; Teni Godai; Hiroyuki Saeki; Yusuke Saigusa; Hironao Okamoto; Manabu Shiozawa; Takashi Oshima; Norio Yukawa; Munetaka Masuda; Yasushi Rino
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2020 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.155

2.  Feasibility of a unidirectionally progressive, pancreas-oriented procedure for laparoscopic D3 right hemicolectomy.

Authors:  Xiangbing Deng; Tao Hu; Mingtian Wei; Qingbin Wu; Tinghan Yang; Wenjian Meng; Ziqiang Wang
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 3.445

3.  Proposal of a new classification system for complete mesocolic excison in right-sided colon cancer.

Authors:  S Benz; A Tannapfel; Y Tam; A Grünenwald; S Vollmer; I Stricker
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 3.781

4.  Who needs diverting ileostomy following laparoscopic low anterior resection in rectal cancer patients? Analysis of 417 patients in a single institute.

Authors:  Hiroki Shimizu; Shigeki Yamaguchi; Toshimasa Ishii; Hiroka Kondo; Kiyoka Hara; Kenichi Takemoto; Shintaro Ishikawa; Takuhisa Okada; Asami Suzuki; Isamu Koyama
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-05-20       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Impact of Primary Tumor Location on Survival After Curative Resection in Patients with Colon Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Propensity Score-Matching Studies.

Authors:  Mitsuru Ishizuka; Takayuki Shimizu; Norisuke Shibuya; Kazutoshi Takagi; Hiroyuki Hachiya; Yusuke Nishi; Kotaro Suda; Taku Aoki; Keiichi Kubota
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2020-10-21

6.  Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic surgery in octogenarians with colorectal cancer: a single-institution analysis.

Authors:  Masashi Miguchi; Masanori Yoshimitsu; Keishi Hakoda; Ichiro Omori; Toshihiko Kohashi; Jun Hihara; Hideki Ohdan; Naoki Hirabayashi
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 2.549

7.  Impact of Left Colonic Artery Preservation on Anastomotic Leakage in Laparoscopic Sigmoid Resection and Anterior Resection for Sigmoid and Rectosigmoid Colon Cancer.

Authors:  Hisaki Kato; Shinya Munakata; Kazuhiro Sakamoto; Kiichi Sugimoto; Riku Yamamoto; Shuhei Ueda; Satoshi Tokuda; Shunsuke Sakuraba; Tomoyuki Kushida; Hajime Orita; Mutsumi Sakurada; Hiroshi Maekawa; Koichi Sato
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2018-07-10

8.  Surgical techniques for advanced transverse colon cancer using the pincer approach of the transverse mesocolon.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Egi; Ikki Nakashima; Minoru Hattori; Shoichiro Mukai; Masatoshi Kochi; Kazuhiro Taguchi; Haruki Sada; Yusuke Sumi; Hideki Ohdan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  The Short- and Long-Term Feasibility of Laparoscopic Surgery in Colon Cancer Patients with Bulky Tumors.

Authors:  Toshiya Nagasaki; Takashi Akiyoshi; Yosuke Fukunaga; Tetsuro Tominaga; Tomohiro Yamaguchi; Tsuyoshi Konishi; Yoshiya Fujimoto; Satoshi Nagayama; Masashi Ueno
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 3.452

10.  Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (JSCCR) guidelines 2020 for the Clinical Practice of Hereditary Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Naohiro Tomita; Hideyuki Ishida; Kohji Tanakaya; Tatsuro Yamaguchi; Kensuke Kumamoto; Toshiaki Tanaka; Takao Hinoi; Yasuyuki Miyakura; Hirotoshi Hasegawa; Tetsuji Takayama; Hideki Ishikawa; Takeshi Nakajima; Akiko Chino; Hideki Shimodaira; Akira Hirasawa; Yoshiko Nakayama; Shigeki Sekine; Kazuo Tamura; Kiwamu Akagi; Yuko Kawasaki; Hirotoshi Kobayashi; Masami Arai; Michio Itabashi; Yojiro Hashiguchi; Kenichi Sugihara
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 3.402

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.