| Literature DB >> 30353107 |
Luca Di Antonio1, Lisa Toto2, Alessandra Mastropasqua1, Lorenza Brescia1, Emanuele Erroi1, Alessia Lamolinara3, Marta Di Nicola4, Leonardo Mastropasqua1.
Abstract
The aim of the study was to assess retinal vascular changes using optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) and aqueous humour changes of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and placental growth factor (PIGF) levels in treatment-naïve myopic choroidal neovascularization (mCNV) after aflibercept intravitreal injection. To explore the correlation between clinical and laboratory parameters. Fifteen eyes of 15 patients with treatment-naïve mCNV underwent 2 intravitreal injections of aflibercept. Main outcome measures were best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central retinal thickness (CRT) and external limiting membrane (ELM) visualization at OCT, lesion area and leakage at fluorescein angiography (FA), OCTA flow area and selected area at baseline and after the injections. Analysis of VEGF and PlGF in the aqueous humor was performed before each injection in cases and prior to cataract surgery on 10 patients as included as controls. Median BCVA increased from 0.6 to 0.3 logMAR (p < 0.001); CRT decreased from 387.5 to 267 micron (p < 0.001); FA area from 0.8 to 0.5 mm2 and OCTA area from 0.9 to 0.5 mm2 (p = 0.005). PIGF values changed from 1.8 to 1.4 pg/ml (p = 0.019) and VEGF values from 3.4 to 0.5 pg/ml (p = 0.008). A significant correlation was found after treatment between PIGF levels and BCVA (rho = 0.006) and VEGF levels and BCVA (rho = 0.018); between PlGF and CRT (rho = 0.020), PlGF and ELM visualization (rho = 0.002) and PlGF and FA leakage (rho < 0.001). Our results showed a significant reduction of mCNV area after aflibercept in both FA and OCTA measurements; an improvement of BCVA, and a reduction of VEGF and PIGF levels related to inactivity of the disease.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30353107 PMCID: PMC6199317 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-33926-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Baseline characteristics of cases and controls expressed as median and interquartile range (Q1–Q3).
| Controls | mCNV |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (yr), | 63.1 ± 11.2 | 64.1 ± 12.1 |
|
| Gender, |
| ||
| Male | 5 (33.3) | 6 (40.0) | |
| Female | 10 (66.7) | 9 (60.0) | |
| Refractive error (D) | −11.5 (8.75–13.25) | 2.1 (1.2–2.2) |
|
| BCVA (logMAR) | 0.3 (0.2–0.7) | 0.6 (0.5–0.8) |
|
| CRT (µm) | 206.0 (198.5–246.5) | 387.5 (331.0–314.5) |
|
| PlGF (pg/ml) | 3.0 (2.0–4.0) | 1.8 (1.5–2.9) |
|
| VEGF (pg/ml) | 13.5 (10.8–16.3) | 3.4 (2.0–5.6) |
|
BCVA, best corrected visual acuity; CRT, central retinal thickness; PlGF, placental growth factor; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor.
aMann-Whitney U test vs controls; bChi Square test.
Median and interquartile range (Q1–Q3) of different parameters at different follow-up time in mCNV patients.
| T0 | T1 | T2 |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BCVA (logMAR) | 0.6 (0.5–0.8) | 0.3 (0.3–0.4)* | 0.3 (0.3–0.4) |
|
| FA Leakage | 2 (2–2) | — | 0 (0–0.3) |
|
| FA area (mm2) | 0.8 (0.5–3) | — | 0.5 (0.3–1.5) |
|
| OCTA Selected Area (mm2) | 0.9 (0.5–2.9) | 0.6 (0.3–2)* | 0.5 (0.2–1.5) |
|
| OCTA Flow Area (mm2) | 0.5 (0.3–1.5) | 0.3 (0.2–0.9)* | 0.3 (0.1–0.6) |
|
| CRT (µm) | 387.5 (331.0–435.8) | 285.0 (257.5–333.5)* | 267.0 (255.3–314.5) |
|
| ELM visualization | 0 (0–0) | 2 (1.7–2)* | 2 (1.8–2) |
|
| PlGF (pg/ml) | 1.8 (1.5–2.9) | 1.4 (1.1–1.9)* | — |
|
| VEGF (pg/ml) | 3.4 (2–5.6) | 0.5 (0.1–0.9)* | — |
|
BCVA, best corrected visual acuity; FA, fluorescein angiography; OCTA, optical coherence tomography angiography; CRT, central retinal thickness; ELM, external limiting membrane; PlGF, placental growth factor; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor.
aFriedman test; bWilcoxon U test.
*p < 0.05 post hoc analysis respect to previous follow-up control.
Figure 2Box-whiskers graphs of VEGF (upper panel) and PIGF (lower panel) values in mCNV and control eyes. Box-whiskers plots show the 25th and 75th percentile range (box) with 95% confidence intervals (whiskers) and median values (transverse lines in the box). Mann-Whitney U test showed a statistical significant difference between two groups.
Figure 1Fluorescein angiography and OCT angiography area measurements of mCNV at baseline (panel A) and after two aflibercept intravitreal injections (panel B). Note the agreement between FA and OCT angiography area measurements and the reduction of mCNV area after treatment.
Spearman’s rho correlation coefficient (p-value) between clinical parameter and VEGF and PIGF in mCNV patients at different follow-up times.
| T0 | T1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VEGF | PlGF | VEGF | PlGF | |
| BCVA (logMAR) | 0.546 | −0.230 | 0.525 | 0.595 |
| CRT(µm) | −0.711 | −0.219 | −0.086 | 0.514 |
| ELM visualization | −0.351 | −0.659 | ||
| FA Leakage | 0.433 | 0.774 | ||
| OCTA Selected Area | −0.030 | 0.442 | −0.110 | 0.336 |
| OCTA Flow Area | −0.030 | 0.442 | 0.031 | 0.269 |