| Literature DB >> 30352137 |
David C Handler1, Dana Pascovici1,2, Mehdi Mirzaei1,2, Vivek Gupta3, Ghasem Hosseini Salekdeh1,4, Paul A Haynes1.
Abstract
Western blotting as an orthogonal validation tool for quantitative proteomics data has rapidly become a de facto requirement for publication. In this viewpoint article, the pros and cons of western blotting as a validation approach are discussed, using examples from our own published work, and how to best apply it to improve the quality of data published is outlined. Further, suggestions and guidelines for some other experimental approaches are provided, which can be used for validation of quantitative proteomics data in addition to, or in place of, western blotting.Keywords: data quality; data validation; false discovery rate; shotgun proteomics
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30352137 DOI: 10.1002/pmic.201800222
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Proteomics ISSN: 1615-9853 Impact factor: 3.984