Literature DB >> 30350370

Phenotypic and molecular dissection of metaplastic breast cancer and the prognostic implications.

Amy Ellen McCart Reed1, Emarene Kalaw1, Katia Nones2, Mark Bettington1, Malcolm Lim1, James Bennett1,3, Kate Johnstone1,3, Jamie Rose Kutasovic1, Jodi Marie Saunus1, Stephen Kazakoff2, Qinying Xu2, Scott Wood2, Oliver Holmes2, Conrad Leonard2, Lynne Estelle Reid1, Debra Black1, Colleen Niland1, Kaltin Ferguson1, Irma Gresshoff1, Ashwini Raghavendra1, Kate Harvey4, Caroline Cooper4, Cheng Liu1,3, Lauren Kalinowski1,3, Andrew Scott Reid1,3, Morgan Davidson1,3, John V Pearson2, Nirmala Pathmanathan5, Gary Tse6, David Papadimos7, Rajadurai Pathmanathan8, Gavin Harris9, Rin Yamaguchi10, Puay Hoon Tan11, Stephen B Fox12, Sandra A O'Toole4, Peter Thomas Simpson1, Nicola Waddell2, Sunil R Lakhani1,3.   

Abstract

Metaplastic breast carcinoma (MBC) is relatively rare but accounts for a significant proportion of global breast cancer mortality. This group is extremely heterogeneous and by definition exhibits metaplastic change to squamous and/or mesenchymal elements, including spindle, squamous, chondroid, osseous, and rhabdomyoid features. Clinically, patients are more likely to present with large primary tumours (higher stage), distant metastases, and overall, have shorter 5-year survival compared to invasive carcinomas of no special type. The current World Health Organisation (WHO) diagnostic classification for this cancer type is based purely on morphology - the biological basis and clinical relevance of its seven sub-categories are currently unclear. By establishing the Asia-Pacific MBC (AP-MBC) Consortium, we amassed a large series of MBCs (n = 347) and analysed the mutation profile of a subset, expression of 14 breast cancer biomarkers, and clinicopathological correlates, contextualising our findings within the WHO guidelines. The most significant indicators of poor prognosis were large tumour size (T3; p = 0.004), loss of cytokeratin expression (lack of staining with pan-cytokeratin AE1/3 antibody; p = 0.007), EGFR overexpression (p = 0.01), and for 'mixed' MBC, the presence of more than three distinct morphological entities (p = 0.007). Conversely, fewer morphological components and EGFR negativity were favourable indicators. Exome sequencing of 30 cases confirmed enrichment of TP53 and PTEN mutations, and intriguingly, concurrent mutations of TP53, PTEN, and PIK3CA. Mutations in neurofibromatosis-1 (NF1) were also overrepresented [16.7% MBCs compared to ∼5% of breast cancers overall; enrichment p = 0.028; mutation significance p = 0.006 (OncodriveFM)], consistent with published case reports implicating germline NF1 mutations in MBC risk. Taken together, we propose a practically minor but clinically significant modification to the guidelines: all WHO_1 mixed-type tumours should have the number of morphologies present recorded, as a mechanism for refining prognosis, and that EGFR and pan-cytokeratin expression are important prognostic markers.
Copyright © 2018 Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Copyright © 2018 Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  breast cancer; epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition; genomics; heterogeneity; metaplastic; spindle; squamous

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30350370     DOI: 10.1002/path.5184

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pathol        ISSN: 0022-3417            Impact factor:   7.996


  25 in total

1.  Molecular Characterization and Prospective Evaluation of Pathologic Response and Outcomes with Neoadjuvant Therapy in Metaplastic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Clinton Yam; Nour Abuhadra; Ryan Sun; Beatriz E Adrada; Qing-Qing Ding; Jason B White; Elizabeth E Ravenberg; Alyson R Clayborn; Vicente Valero; Debu Tripathy; Senthilkumar Damodaran; Banu K Arun; Jennifer K Litton; Naoto T Ueno; Rashmi K Murthy; Bora Lim; Luis Baez; Xiaoxian Li; Aman U Buzdar; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Alistair M Thompson; Elizabeth A Mittendorf; Gaiane M Rauch; Rosalind P Candelaria; Lei Huo; Stacy L Moulder; Jeffrey T Chang
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 13.801

2.  Prognostic Factor Analysis and Model Construction of Triple-Negative Metaplastic Breast Carcinoma After Surgery.

Authors:  Keying Zhu; Yuyuan Chen; Rong Guo; Lanyi Dai; Jiankui Wang; Yiyin Tang; Shaoqiang Zhou; Dedian Chen; Sheng Huang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 5.738

3.  Metaplastic carcinoma of the breast: Clinicopathological features and treatment outcomes with long-term follow up.

Authors:  Aron Gortman; Noel J Aherne; Justin Westhuyzen; Julan V Amalaseelan; Patrick M Dwyer; Matthew Hoffmann; Andrew T Last; Thomas P Shakespeare
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-07-01

4.  Whole-exome analysis of metaplastic breast carcinomas with extensive osseous differentiation.

Authors:  Francisco Beca; Ana P M Sebastiao; Fresia Pareja; Kimberly Dessources; John R Lozada; Felipe Geyer; Pier Selenica; Nebras Zeizafoun; Hannah Y Wen; Larry Norton; Edi Brogi; Britta Weigelt; Jorge S Reis-Filho
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 5.087

Review 5.  Breast Cancer: A Molecularly Heterogenous Disease Needing Subtype-Specific Treatments.

Authors:  Ugo Testa; Germana Castelli; Elvira Pelosi
Journal:  Med Sci (Basel)       Date:  2020-03-23

6.  Clinicopathologic and genetic features of metaplastic breast cancer with osseous differentiation: a series of 6 cases.

Authors:  Xue Chao; Wanlin Tan; Julia Y Tsang; Gary M Tse; Jintao Hu; Ping Li; Jinghui Hou; Mei Li; Jiehua He; Peng Sun
Journal:  Breast Cancer       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 4.239

Review 7.  Breast tumor-on-chip models: From disease modeling to personalized drug screening.

Authors:  Bano Subia; Ujjwal Ranjan Dahiya; Sarita Mishra; Jessica Ayache; Guilhem Velve Casquillas; David Caballero; Rui L Reis; Subhas C Kundu
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 9.776

8.  Metaplastic Breast Carcinoma: Clinicopathological Parameters and Prognostic Profile.

Authors:  Saroona Haroon; Shamail Zia; Umme Aiman Shirazi; Omer Ahmed; Ishaq Azeem Asghar; Muhammad Asad Diwan; Anoshia Afzal; Muhammad Irfan; Syed Jawwad Ali; Atif A Hashmi
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-04-07

9.  Metaplastic carcinomas of the breast without evidence of epithelial differentiation: a diagnostic approach for management.

Authors:  Emad A Rakha; Cecily M Quinn; Maria Pia Foschini; Monica Muñoz Martin; David J Dabbs; Sunil Lakhani; Zsuzsanna Varga; Sarah E Pinder; Fernando C Schmitt; Jorge S Reis-Filho; Stephen B Fox; Ian O Ellis; Puay-Hoon Tan; Raluca Mihai
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2020-12-16       Impact factor: 5.087

Review 10.  Collective metastasis: coordinating the multicellular voyage.

Authors:  Emma Wrenn; Yin Huang; Kevin Cheung
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 4.510

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.