Literature DB >> 30350151

In vitro screening of plants from the Brazilian Caatinga biome for methanogenic potential in ruminant nutrition.

Brena Santos Oliveira1, Luiz Gustavo Ribeiro Pereira2, Jose Augusto Gomes Azevêdo1, João Paulo Pacheco Rodrigues3, Gherman Garcia Leal de Araújo4, Rogerio Martins Maurício5, Fernanda Samarini Machado6, Mariana Magalhães Campos6, Tássia Ludmila Teles Martins7, Thierry Ribeiro Tomich6.   

Abstract

Thirty-nine plants naturally found in Brazilian Caatinga semiarid biome were screened using an in vitro fermentability testing focused in apparent organic matter digestibility (aOMD), gas, methane (CH4), and short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) production. Three independent in vitro runs were carried out and plants were classified by CH4 concentration as proportion of gas and per unit of apparent digested organic matter (aDOM). According to its CH4 concentration on produced gas (mL/L), the plants were classified as low (> 110), medium (from 60 to 110), and high (< 60) anti-methanogenic potential. From evaluated plants, 3, 24, and 12 were classified as high, medium, and low anti-methanogenic potential. High anti-methanogenic potential plants Cnidoscolus phillacanthus (CnPh), Chloroleucon foliolosum (ChFo), and Anadenanthera macrocarpa (AnMa) produced 21.3, 34.3, and 35.9 mL CH4/L of gas. Methane concentration for Myracrodruon urundeuva (MyUr) was 61.1 mL/L and classified as medium potential. However, CH4 production per unit of aDOM was similar between MyUr and AnMa (3.35 and 2.68 mL/g, respectively). Molar proportions of acetate and propionate in SCFA produced by ChFo fermentation were 0.02 and 0.78 mmol/mol. Acetate to propionate ratios were 0.79, 0.03, 1.39, and 1.36 for CnPh, ChFo, AnMa, and MyUr, respectively. Greater aOMD were observed for Opuntia sp. and Calotropis procera (632 and 601 g/kg, respectively), which were classified as medium mitigating potential plants. AnMa, ChFo, CnPh, and MyUr are promising anti-methanogenic plants for ruminants. Selecting forages to feed ruminants in Caatinga is a potential strategy for enteric CH4 emission reduction, and our in vitro results can support future research by indicating species to be evaluated in in vivo studies integrating mixed diets with performance, digestibility, and CH4 production, yield, and intensity. Graphical abstract ᅟ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acetate; Digestibility; Greenhouse gas; In vitro; Plant secondary compounds; Propionate; Short-chain fatty acids

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30350151     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-018-3446-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  16 in total

1.  Replacement of wheat bran with spineless cactus (Opuntia ficus indica Mill cv Gigante) and urea in the diets of Holstein x Gyr heifers.

Authors:  Carolina Corrêa de Figueiredo Monteiro; Airon Aparecido Silva de Melo; Marcelo Andrade Ferreira; José Mauricio de Souza Campos; Julyana Sena Rodrigues Souza; Evannielly Thuanny Dos Santos Silva; Rafael de Paula Xavier de Andrade; Emmanuelle Cordeiro da Silva
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 1.559

2.  Phytogeographical patterns of dry forests sensu stricto in northern Minas Gerais State, Brazil.

Authors:  Daniel M Arruda; Walnir G Ferreira-Júnior; Reinaldo Duque-Brasil; Carlos E R Schaefer
Journal:  An Acad Bras Cienc       Date:  2013 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.753

3.  Effects of monolaurin on ruminal methanogens and selected bacterial species from cattle, as determined with the rumen simulation technique.

Authors:  Fenja Klevenhusen; Leo Meile; Michael Kreuzer; Carla R Soliva
Journal:  Anaerobe       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 3.331

4.  Effects of condensed tannin fractions of different molecular weights from a Leucaena leucocephala hybrid on in vitro methane production and rumen fermentation.

Authors:  Mookiah Saminathan; Chin Chin Sieo; Norhani Abdullah; Clemente Michael Vui Ling Wong; Yin Wan Ho
Journal:  J Sci Food Agric       Date:  2014-12-19       Impact factor: 3.638

5.  Differences in the nutrient concentrations, in vitro methanogenic potential and other fermentative traits of tropical grasses and legumes for beef production systems in northern Australia.

Authors:  Zoey Durmic; Carlos A Ramírez-Restrepo; Chris Gardiner; Christopher J O'Neill; Eman Hussein; Philip E Vercoe
Journal:  J Sci Food Agric       Date:  2017-03-22       Impact factor: 3.638

6.  Effects of essential oils on methane production and fermentation by, and abundance and diversity of, rumen microbial populations.

Authors:  Amlan K Patra; Zhongtang Yu
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-04-06       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Phytochemical and pharmacological aspects of Cnidoscolus Pohl species: A systematic review.

Authors:  Raimundo Gonçalves de Oliveira-Júnior; Christiane Adrielly Alves Ferraz; Ana Paula de Oliveira; Camila Souza Araújo; Layanne Feitosa da Silva Oliveira; Laurent Picot; Larissa Araújo Rolim; Pedro José Rolim-Neto; Jackson Roberto Guedes da Silva Almeida
Journal:  Phytomedicine       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 5.340

8.  Methane Production of Different Forages in In vitro Ruminal Fermentation.

Authors:  S J Meale; A V Chaves; J Baah; T A McAllister
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.509

9.  Effect of Tannin and Species Variation on In vitro Digestibility, Gas, and Methane Production of Tropical Browse Plants.

Authors:  B S Gemeda; A Hassen
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.509

10.  Characterization and quantification of the compounds of the ethanolic extract from Caesalpinia ferrea stem bark and evaluation of their mutagenic activity.

Authors:  Carlos César Wyrepkowski; Daryne Lu Maldonado Gomes da Costa; Adilson Paulo Sinhorin; Wagner Vilegas; Rone Aparecido De Grandis; Flavia Aparecida Resende; Eliana Aparecida Varanda; Lourdes Campaner dos Santos
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 4.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.