| Literature DB >> 30349673 |
Warinporn Klunklin1, Geoffrey Savage1.
Abstract
Biscuits were formulated using a 50/50 wheat and purple rice flour mix containing mixed spices, galangal, and defatted green-lipped mussel powder (Perna canaliculus) added in the range of 5-15% of the total biscuit weight. The fortified biscuits had higher protein (26.36%), fiber (52.90%), and ash (6.00%) contents and a lower total fat (5.64%) content compared to the control biscuits. The in vitro starch digestibility and predicted glycemic index (pGI) decreased in the fortified biscuits by 18.95% and 6.18%, respectively, while the in vitro protein digestibility increased by 3.73%, corresponding to the increased levels of defatted mussel powder present. The spread ratio and hardness of the fortified biscuits also increased significantly. The color values of the fortified biscuits after the incorporation of different levels of defatted mussel powder showed significant changes, with a darkening of the biscuit surface and a lowered browning index compared to the control biscuits. Results of the sensory quality evaluation showed that incorporation of defatted mussel powder into the biscuit mix of up to 15% showed no significant differences in liking scores in terms of color, overall appearance; whereas, the flavor and overall acceptability scores were significantly lower than the control biscuits. Overall, defatted mussel powder can be successfully incorporated into biscuit mixes to enrich the protein, fiber, and antioxidant contents of the biscuits.Entities:
Keywords: antioxidants; biscuit; green‐lipped mussel powder; in vitro digestion; purple rice flour; sensory evaluation
Year: 2018 PMID: 30349673 PMCID: PMC6189611 DOI: 10.1002/fsn3.675
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Food Sci Nutr ISSN: 2048-7177 Impact factor: 2.863
Formulation of different biscuits supplemented with defatted mussel powder
| Ingredients | Experimental biscuits (g) | |
|---|---|---|
| Control | Fortified biscuit | |
| Refined wheat flour | 50 | 50 |
| Purple rice flour | 50 | 50 |
| Defatted mussel powder | – | Varied from 5%–15% |
| Butter | 75 | 75 |
| Sugar | 62.5 | 62.5 |
| Egg | 112.5 | 112.5 |
| Salt | 0.75 | 0.75 |
| Mixed spices | – | 2 |
| Cinnamon | – | 1 |
| Nutmeg | – | 1 |
| Galangal | – | 4 |
| Sodium bicarbonate | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Xanthan gum | 1.25 | 1.25 |
Basic characteristics of the fortified biscuits prepared from wheat–purple rice flour blends mixed with mussel powder and mixed spices
| Parameters (% DM basis) | % defatted green‐lipped mussel powder | LSD (5%) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 (Control) | 5 | 10 | 15 | ||
| Moisture content (%) | 5.06 ± 0.03a | 4.99 ± 0.05b | 4.73 ± 0.01c | 4.69 ± 0.03d | 0.05 |
| Crude protein (%) | 7.31 ± 0.13d | 8.50 ± 0.04c | 9.33 ± 0.17b | 9.88 ± 0.07a | 0.14 |
| Protein digestibility (%) | 82.59 ± 1.33NS | 85.17 ± 0.06 | 85.73 ± 0.85 | 86.12 ± 0.70 | 3.54 |
| Total dietary fiber (%) | 15.76 ± 0.11d | 20.61 ± 0.30c | 23.76 ± 0.09b | 27.45 ± 0.07a | 0.28 |
| Ash (%) | 2.33 ± 0.03c | 2.27 ± 0.03bc | 2.47 ± 0.03b | 2.67 ± 0.07a | 0.07 |
| Total fat (%) | 25.30 ± 0.50a | 23.37 ± 0.10b | 24.05 ± 0.27ab | 24.43 ± 0.20ab | 0.50 |
| Total starch (%) | 33.70 ± 1.79NS | 36.91 ± 0.37 | 35.42 ± 1.01 | 35.05 ± 1.43 | 3.26 |
| AUC of digested starch (mg min/dl) | 462.01 ± 0.43a | 422.17 ± 0.26b | 391.67 ± 0.28c | 351.35 ± 0.75d | 1.26 |
| pGI | 62.56 ± 0.02a | 60.59 ± 0.01b | 59.08 ± 0.01c | 57.09 ± 0.04d | 0.07 |
AUC, Area under the curve; LSD, least significant difference; NS, not significant.
Values represent mean ± SE. In each row, sample means not having the same letter are significantly different (Duncan's multiple range test, p < .05).
Physical, textural, and L*a*b* color characteristics of the fortified biscuits prepared from wheat–purple rice flour blends mixed with mussel powder and mixed spices
| Physical parameters | % defatted green‐lipped mussel powder | LSD (5%) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 (Control) | 5 | 10 | 15 | ||
| Hardness (N) | 19.05 ± 0.07d | 19.43 ± 0.02c | 19.95 ± 0.11b | 20.49 ± 0.06a | 0.17 |
| Width (W, mm) | 62.67 ± 0.21a | 61.17 ± 0.48b | 61.00 ± 0.37b | 60.67 ± 0.33b | 0.75 |
| Thickness (T, mm) | 6.50 ± 0.22c | 7.17 ± 0.75bc | 7.50 ± 0.22b | 8.33 ± 0.82a | 0.68 |
| Spread ratio (W/T) | 9.70 ± 0.33a | 8.60 ± 0.40b | 8.20 ± 0.30bc | 7.35 ± 0.32c | 0.81 |
| Color values | |||||
| L* | 78.46 ± 0.13a | 77.31 ± 0.08bc | 77.62 ± 0.07b | 77.06 ± 0.20c | 0.27 |
| a* | −3.22 ± 0.08a | −4.49 ± 0.11b | −4.93 ± 0.05c | −5.07 ± 0.05c | 0.15 |
| b* | 25.40 ± 0.08a | 24.04 ± 0.11c | 24.34 ± 0.12b | 23.87 ± 0.09c | 0.21 |
| Browning index | 34.82 ± 0.23a | 31.67 ± 0.21b | 31.60 ± 0.24b | 30.87 ± 0.20c | 0.47 |
LSD, least significant difference.
Values represent mean ± SE. For each row, sample means not having the same letter are significantly different (Duncan's multiple range test, p < .05).
Bioactive compounds contents of the fortified biscuits prepared from wheat–purple rice flour blends mixed with mussel powder and mixed spices
| Bioactive compounds | % defatted green‐lipped mussel powder | LSD (5%) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 5 | 10 | 15 | ||
| Total phenolics (mg GAE/100 g DW) | 2664.72 ± 8.68d | 3120.98 ± 0.78c | 3311.62 ± 13.77b | 3522.96 ± 10.87a | 10.88 |
| Anthocyanin (C3G, mg/kg DW) | 19.20 ± 0.10d | 24.38 ± 0.25c | 25.88 ± 0.10b | 27.55 ± 0.25a | 0.31 |
| Flavonoid contents (mg CE/100 g DW) | 1.12 ± 0.07d | 1.52 ± 0.07c | 1.77 ± 0.10b | 2.12 ± 0.10a | 0.01 |
| DPPH (μmol Trolox/g DW) | 47.52 ± 0.11d | 48.06 ± 0.01c | 48.62 ± 0.06b | 48.96 ± 0.07a | 0.12 |
| ABTS (μmol Trolox/g DW) | 11.95 ± 0.18d | 16.39 ± 0.24c | 30.60 ± 0.19b | 41.07 ± 0.03a | 0.29 |
LSD, least significant difference.
Each row, sample means not having the same letter are significantly different (Duncan's multiple range test, p < .05). Values represent mean ± SE.
Mean liking scores of the fortified biscuits prepared from wheat–purple rice flour blends mixed with mussel powder and mixed spices
| Attributes | % defatted green‐lipped mussel powder | LSD (5%) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 5 | 10 | 15 | ||
| Color | 6.42 ± 0.26NS | 6.19 ± 0.20 | 6.38 ± 0.24 | 6.27 ± 0.27 | 1.86 |
| Overall appearance | 6.69 ± 0.23NS | 5.92 ± 0.29 | 6.42 ± 0.27 | 6.46 ± 0.30 | 1.97 |
| Touch/oiliness | 7.27 ± 0.22a | 6.54 ± 0.26ab | 6.35 ± 0.25b | 6.38 ± 0.30b | 0.87 |
| Crunchiness | 7.62 ± 0.20a | 6.58 ± 0.27b | 6.46 ± 0.27b | 6.35 ± 0.27b | 1.02 |
| Flavor | 7.04 ± 0.36a | 5.46 ± 0.45b | 5.27 ± 0.36b | 4.62 ± 0.40b | 1.52 |
| Overall acceptability | 7.42 ± 0.25a | 5.65 ± 0.40b | 5.38 ± 0.30b | 5.31 ± 0.18b | 1.67 |
LSD, least significant difference; NS, not significant.
Each row, sample means not having the same letter are significantly different (Duncan's multiple range test, p < .001). Data are expressed as mean ± SE.