Literature DB >> 30349471

Automatically Selecting a Suitable Integration Scheme for Systems of Differential Equations in Neuron Models.

Inga Blundell1, Dimitri Plotnikov2,3, Jochen M Eppler2, Abigail Morrison1,2,4.   

Abstract

On the level of the spiking activity, the integrate-and-fire neuron is one of the most commonly used descriptions of neural activity. A multitude of variants has been proposed to cope with the huge diversity of behaviors observed in biological nerve cells. The main appeal of this class of model is that it can be defined in terms of a hybrid model, where a set of mathematical equations describes the sub-threshold dynamics of the membrane potential and the generation of action potentials is often only added algorithmically without the shape of spikes being part of the equations. In contrast to more detailed biophysical models, this simple description of neuron models allows the routine simulation of large biological neuronal networks on standard hardware widely available in most laboratories these days. The time evolution of the relevant state variables is usually defined by a small set of ordinary differential equations (ODEs). A small number of evolution schemes for the corresponding systems of ODEs are commonly used for many neuron models, and form the basis of the neuron model implementations built into commonly used simulators like Brian, NEST and NEURON. However, an often neglected problem is that the implemented evolution schemes are only rarely selected through a structured process based on numerical criteria. This practice cannot guarantee accurate and stable solutions for the equations and the actual quality of the solution depends largely on the parametrization of the model. In this article, we give an overview of typical equations and state descriptions for the dynamics of the relevant variables in integrate-and-fire models. We then describe a formal mathematical process to automate the design or selection of a suitable evolution scheme for this large class of models. Finally, we present the reference implementation of our symbolic analysis toolbox for ODEs that can guide modelers during the implementation of custom neuron models.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ODE; integrate-and-fire neuron; integration schemes; model dynamics; numerics; symbolic analysis

Year:  2018        PMID: 30349471      PMCID: PMC6186990          DOI: 10.3389/fninf.2018.00050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Neuroinform        ISSN: 1662-5196            Impact factor:   4.081


  16 in total

Review 1.  Expanding NEURON's repertoire of mechanisms with NMODL.

Authors:  M L Hines; N T Carnevale
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 2.026

2.  Adaptive exponential integrate-and-fire model as an effective description of neuronal activity.

Authors:  Romain Brette; Wulfram Gerstner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-07-13       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Exact subthreshold integration with continuous spike times in discrete-time neural network simulations.

Authors:  Abigail Morrison; Sirko Straube; Hans Ekkehard Plesser; Markus Diesmann
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 2.026

4.  A general and efficient method for incorporating precise spike times in globally time-driven simulations.

Authors:  Alexander Hanuschkin; Susanne Kunkel; Moritz Helias; Abigail Morrison; Markus Diesmann
Journal:  Front Neuroinform       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 4.081

5.  Scalability of Asynchronous Networks Is Limited by One-to-One Mapping between Effective Connectivity and Correlations.

Authors:  Sacha Jennifer van Albada; Moritz Helias; Markus Diesmann
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 4.475

6.  The cell-type specific cortical microcircuit: relating structure and activity in a full-scale spiking network model.

Authors:  Tobias C Potjans; Markus Diesmann
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2012-12-02       Impact factor: 5.357

7.  Limits to the development of feed-forward structures in large recurrent neuronal networks.

Authors:  Susanne Kunkel; Markus Diesmann; Abigail Morrison
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2011-02-14       Impact factor: 2.380

8.  Reproducing Polychronization: A Guide to Maximizing the Reproducibility of Spiking Network Models.

Authors:  Robin Pauli; Philipp Weidel; Susanne Kunkel; Abigail Morrison
Journal:  Front Neuroinform       Date:  2018-08-03       Impact factor: 4.081

9.  The brian simulator.

Authors:  Dan F M Goodman; Romain Brette
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2009-09-15       Impact factor: 4.677

10.  Equation-oriented specification of neural models for simulations.

Authors:  Marcel Stimberg; Dan F M Goodman; Victor Benichoux; Romain Brette
Journal:  Front Neuroinform       Date:  2014-02-04       Impact factor: 4.081

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Code Generation in Computational Neuroscience: A Review of Tools and Techniques.

Authors:  Inga Blundell; Romain Brette; Thomas A Cleland; Thomas G Close; Daniel Coca; Andrew P Davison; Sandra Diaz-Pier; Carlos Fernandez Musoles; Padraig Gleeson; Dan F M Goodman; Michael Hines; Michael W Hopkins; Pramod Kumbhar; David R Lester; Bóris Marin; Abigail Morrison; Eric Müller; Thomas Nowotny; Alexander Peyser; Dimitri Plotnikov; Paul Richmond; Andrew Rowley; Bernhard Rumpe; Marcel Stimberg; Alan B Stokes; Adam Tomkins; Guido Trensch; Marmaduke Woodman; Jochen Martin Eppler
Journal:  Front Neuroinform       Date:  2018-11-05       Impact factor: 4.081

2.  Rigorous Neural Network Simulations: A Model Substantiation Methodology for Increasing the Correctness of Simulation Results in the Absence of Experimental Validation Data.

Authors:  Guido Trensch; Robin Gutzen; Inga Blundell; Michael Denker; Abigail Morrison
Journal:  Front Neuroinform       Date:  2018-11-26       Impact factor: 4.081

3.  A System-on-Chip Based Hybrid Neuromorphic Compute Node Architecture for Reproducible Hyper-Real-Time Simulations of Spiking Neural Networks.

Authors:  Guido Trensch; Abigail Morrison
Journal:  Front Neuroinform       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 3.739

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.