Literature DB >> 30348348

In Search of the Ever-Elusive Postoperative Shoulder Balance: Is the T2 UIV the Key?

Jaysson T Brooks1, Tracey P Bastrom2, Carrie E Bartley2, Baron S Lonner3, Suken A Shah4, Firoz Miyanji5, Jahangir Asghar6, Peter O Newton2, Burt Yaszay7.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Multicenter review of prospectively collected data.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether a UIV of T2 reliably results in level shoulders postoperatively. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients with a risk of a high left shoulder postoperatively are generally recommended to have instrumentation to T2, those with neutral shoulders a T3 UIV, and those with an elevated right shoulder are recommended a UIV of T4 or below in order to achieve postoperative shoulder balance.
METHODS: A prospective, multicenter AIS database was queried for subjects with minimum two-year follow-up who underwent posterior spinal fusion to correct their main thoracic deformity. Subjects were grouped based on their proximal fusion level. A high shoulder was defined as >1 cm difference on radiographs.
RESULTS: A total of 626 subjects met inclusion criteria and were divided by UIVs of T2 189, T3 205, and T4 232. Preoperatively, the groups had similar rates of balanced shoulders (T2 47%, T3 49%, T4 45%) and high left shoulders (T2 8.5%, T3 8.8%, and T4 7.3%). Postoperatively, there was a greater percentage of postoperative shoulder imbalance for T2 (45%) and T3 (48%) UIV groups as compared to T4 (34%, p = .008). As expected, the T2 (46%) and T3 (49%) groups had significantly better upper thoracic curve correction as compared to the T4 group (42%, p < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: The selection of a T4 UIV results in more shoulder balance postoperatively than T2 or T3, regardless of which shoulder was elevated preoperatively. The selection of a T2 UIV does not guarantee postoperative shoulder balance following posterior treatment of main thoracic curves; however, when compared to the more caudal UIV of T4, an improved upper thoracic curve correction can be anticipated. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3.
Copyright © 2018 Scoliosis Research Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis; Shoulder balance; Shoulder symmetry; Spinal fusion; Upper instrumented vertebra

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30348348     DOI: 10.1016/j.jspd.2018.03.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine Deform        ISSN: 2212-134X


  4 in total

1.  Increased proximal vertebral rotation is associated with shoulder imbalance after posterior spinal fusion for severe adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Masayoshi Machida; Brett Rocos; David E Lebel; Reinhard Zeller
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2022-04-18

2.  Sinister! The high pre-op left shoulder is less likely to be radiographically balanced at 2 years post-op.

Authors:  Joshua T Bram; Nishank Mehta; John M Flynn; Jason B Anari; Keith D Baldwin; Burt Yaszay; Joshua M Pahys; Patrick J Cahill
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2020-11-17

3.  Evaluation of the Radiographic Risk Factors of Postoperative Shoulder Imbalance in Adult Scoliosis.

Authors:  Wencan Ke; Bingjin Wang; Wenbin Hua; Kun Wang; Shuai Li; Cao Yang
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-06-09

4.  Usefulness of modified S-line for upper instrumented vertebra selection in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis Lenke type 2 curves.

Authors:  Tetsuhiko Mimura; Shota Ikegami; Tomohiro Banno; Shoji Seki; Tetsuro Ohba; Hiroki Oba; Shugo Kuraishi; Masashi Uehara; Ryo Munakata; Takashi Takizawa; Terue Hatakenaka; Takayuki Kamanaka; Yoshinari Miyaoka; Daisuke Kurogochi; Takuma Fukuzawa; Hirotaka Haro; Yoshiharu Kawaguchi; Yukihiro Matsuyama; Michihiko Koseki; Jun Takahashi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-10-10       Impact factor: 4.996

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.