| Literature DB >> 30348088 |
Viacheslav Sinkov1, Oleg Ogarkov2,3, Igor Mokrousov4, Yuri Bukin5,6, Svetlana Zhdanova1, Scott K Heysell7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Ural genetic family is a part of the Euro-American lineage of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and is endemic in Northern Eurasia (former Soviet Union [FSU]). These strains were long described as drug susceptible and of low virulence, but recent studies reported an increasing circulation of the multidrug-resistant (MDR) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) Ural strains. Here, we analyzed all publicly available whole genome sequence data of Ural genotype isolates, in order to elucidate their phylogenomic diversity with a special focus on MDR and potentially epidemic clones.Entities:
Keywords: Molecular epidemiology; Molecular evolution; Mycobacterium tuberculosis; Next generation sequencing; Phylogenetics; Phylogeography; Population genetics; Ural genotype
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30348088 PMCID: PMC6198502 DOI: 10.1186/s12864-018-5162-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Genomics ISSN: 1471-2164 Impact factor: 3.969
Fig. 1ML consensus phylogenetic tree of 149 M. tuberculosis Ural family strains (CAS family strain was used as outgroup) based on 6002 genome-wide variable amino acid positions. Strain designation includes consecutive number (Additional file 1: Table S1), country of origin, drug resistance. Abbreviations: RU – Russia, MD – Moldova, BY – Belarus, MDR – multidrug resistance, H – isoniazid resistant, E – ethambutol resistant, S – streptomycin resistant, P - pyrazinamide resistant, sus – susceptible, # - pre-XDR, ## - XDR. *- genotypic resistance profile confirmed by phenotypic data (when available at GMTV database http://mtb.dobzhanskycenter.org/). The CAS strain was used as outgroup under phylogenetic analysis; it did not have any drug resistance mutation
Distribution of drug resistance among phylogenetic clades of the Ural family
| Identifiers | Number of strains ( | Susceptible and monoresistant, number (%) | Polyresistant, number (%) | MDR, number (%) | Pre-XDR and XDR, number (%) | Pre-XDR and XDR prevalence in Clades C vs A&B, χ2a; p |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Out-of-clade strains | 27 | 9 (33.3) | 2 (7.4) | 16 (59.3) | 8 (29.6) | 65.3; < 0.0001 |
| Clade A | 31 | 26 (83.9) | 2 (6.4) | 3 (9.7) | 1 (3.2) | |
| Clade B | 52 | 28 (53.9) | 10 (19.2) | 14 (26.9) | 4 (7.7) | |
| Clade C | 39 | 1 (2.6) | 0 | 38 (97.4) | 32 (82.1) |
aχ2 with Yates correction
Prevalence of mutations in different clades of the Ural genotype
| Gene, codon or position | Clade A ( | Clade B ( | Clade C sensu stricto ( | Clade Ca ( | Other ( |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| rpoB | |||||
| Ser450Leu | 2 | 12 | 31 | 34 | 15 |
| 445 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||
| 452 | 1 | ||||
| 435 | 1 | 1 | |||
| Ser450Trp | 1 | 1 | |||
| rpoC Asp485Asn | 7 | 4 | |||
| katG Ser315Thr | 5 | 33 | 33 | 38 | 20 |
| fibG1 (inhA) -15 C > T | 7 | 33 | 34 | 5 | |
| ahpC promoter | 1 | 1 | |||
| rpsL | |||||
| 43 | 6 | 1 | 1 | ||
| 88 | 2 | 10 | 33 | 35 | 11 |
| embB | |||||
| 297 | 29 | 29 | 2 | ||
| 306 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 7 |
| 319 | 2 | ||||
| 406 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1 | |
| 497 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | |
| 1002 | 1 | ||||
| 1024 | 2 | ||||
| embA | |||||
| -12 C > T | 1 | ||||
| -16 C > T | 8 | 8 | |||
| rrs | |||||
| 517 | 1 | ||||
| 1401 | 2 | ||||
| eis | |||||
| -12G > A | 1 | 3 | 33 | 33 | 3 |
| -15G > C | 2 | 1 | |||
| -37C > A | 1 | ||||
| -10C > T | 1 | ||||
| gyrA | |||||
| 90 | 1 | 1 | 2 | ||
| 94 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | |
| pncA | |||||
| 13 | 1 | 1 | |||
| 160 | 1 | 1 | |||
| -7 | 1 | 1 | |||
| 12 | 4 | 4 | |||
| 14 | 2 | 2 | |||
| -11 | 1 | 1 | 2 | ||
| 34 | 1 | 1 | |||
| 128 | 1 | 1 | |||
| 10 | 2 | ||||
| 159 | 1 | ||||
aClade C includes “Clade C strict sense” plus pre-Clade C isolates (refer to different rose shade on dendrogram in Additional file 5). In few strains, two embB mutations were found
Fig. 2Distribution of distances between amino acid and nucleotide sequences in three Ural clades
Pairwise clade comparison by Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test
| Clade C | Clade B | Clade A | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clade C | – | P < 0.01 | |
| Clade B | W = 0 | – | |
| Clade A | W = 209 | W = 987 | – |
Upper right triangle – probability of rejecting null hypothesis about lack of significant difference between mean mutation rates (amino acid substitutions) in three Clades. Lower left triangle shows Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney statistics values. Lognormal relaxed clock model was used for calculations