| Literature DB >> 30347805 |
Endarto Yudo Wardhono1, Hadi Wahyudi2, Sri Agustina3, François Oudet4, Mekro Permana Pinem5, Danièle Clausse6, Khashayar Saleh7, Erwann Guénin8.
Abstract
The isolation of crystalline regions from fibers cellulose via the hydrolysis route generally requires corrosive chemicals, high-energy demands, and long reaction times, resulting in high economic costs and environmental impact. From this basis, this work seeks to develop environment-friendly processes for the production of Bacterial Cellulose Nanocrystals (BC-NC). To overcome the aforementioned issues, this study proposes a fast, highly-efficient and eco-friendly method for the isolation of cellulose nanocrystals from Bacterial Cellulose, BC. A two-step processes is considered: (1) partial depolymerization of Bacterial Cellulose (DP-BC) under ultrasonic conditions; (2) extraction of crystalline regions (BC-NC) by treatment with diluted HCl catalyzed by metal chlorides (MnCl₂ and FeCl₃.6H₂O) under microwave irradiation. The effect of ultrasonic time and reactant and catalyst concentrations on the index crystallinity (CrI), chemical structure, thermal properties, and surface morphology of DP-BC and BC-NC were evaluated. The results indicated that the ultrasonic treatment induced depolymerization of BC characterized by an increase of the CrI. The microwave assisted by MnCl₂-catalyzed mild acid hydrolysis enhanced the removal of the amorphous regions, yielding BC-NC. A chemical structure analysis demonstrated that the chemical structures of DP-BC and BC-NC remained unchanged after the ultrasonic treatment and MnCl₂-catalyzed acid hydrolysis process.Entities:
Keywords: bacterial cellulose nanocrystals; catalyzed hydrolysis; crystallinity index; microwave treatment; ultrasonic irradiation
Year: 2018 PMID: 30347805 PMCID: PMC6215109 DOI: 10.3390/nano8100859
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.076
Figure 1Fourier Transform Infrared (FT-IR) spectra of: 1. native Bacterial Cellulos (BC); 2. depolymerized cellulose, depolymerization of Bacterial Cellulose (DP-BC), (optimum conditions of ultrasonic irradiation step); 3. extracted crystalline regions, bacterial cellulose nanocrystals (BC-NC) (the best results of the catalyzed hydrolysis treatment).
Typical vibration bands for the Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectra of the cellulose samples Bacterial Cellulos (BC), depolymerization of Bacterial Cellulose (DP-BC) and bacterial cellulose nanocrystals (BC-NC).
| Sample | Wavenumber, cm−1 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| H-bonding region | Fingerprint Print Region | ||||
| Stretching of O–H bonds | Symmetric C–H stretching vibration | Asymmetric Angular Deformation of C–H (Crystalline Regions) | Asymmetrical C–O–C Glycoside Bonds | Asymmetric Angular Deformation of C–H (Amorphous Region) | |
| BC | |||||
| DP-BC | 3342 | 2895 | 1429 | 1163 | 898 |
| BC-NC | |||||
Figure 2X-ray diffractogram of: (a) BC that was fitted by Gauss function; (b) XRD pattern of: 1. native BC; 2. depolymerized cellulose, DP-BC, (the optimum result of ultrasonic irradiation step); 3. extracted crystalline regions, BC-NC (the best results of the catalyzed hydrolysis treatment).
The integrated peak area obtained of each fitting curve.
| Sample | Area (2θ) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14.6° | 16.8° | 22.6° | 23.8° | 27.2° | 29.2° | 34.1° | 34.8° | |
| (101) | (10ī) | (002) | (040) | |||||
| BC | 41.8 | 46.8 | 324.0 | 88.3 | 27.9 | 125.9 | 37.6 | 48.9 |
| DP-BC | 95.8 | 36.5 | 583.8 | 26.1 | 23.0 | 10.1 | 33.5 | 276.6 |
| BC-NC | 46.8 | 38.1 | 420.6 | 110.8 | 17.8 | 51.9 | 122 | 73.6 |
Figure 3Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC)-Thermograms of: 1. BC; 2. depolymerized cellulose, DP-BC; 3. extracted nanocrystalline cellulose, BC-NC.
Figure 4Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) and Scanning Transmission Electron Microscopy (STEM) micrograph of BC-NC (A,C) produced with 0.1M HCl and 5% w/w of MnCl2 compare to commercial NCC (B,D).
Influence of the length of ultrasonic irradiation period on Crystallinity Index, CrI.
| Sample | Integrated Area | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BC | Length of Ultrasonic Irradiation Period (min) | ||||||
| 10 | 20 | 30 | 60 | 120 | MCC 1 | ||
| Acr | 450.2 | 665.3 | 700.3 | 749.4 | 692.6 | 586.3 | 637.5 |
| Atot | 741.2 | 1016.0 | 1032.9 | 1085.2 | 979.4 | 821.1 | 850.5 |
| CrI | 60.7% | 65.5% | 67.8% | 69.1% | 70.7% | 71.4% | 75.0% |
1 Microcrystal Cellulose, MCC (commercial).
Figure 5The evolutions of crystalline regions formations for treatment of bacterial cellulose after 30 min irradiation time in pure water (blue curve) or a mixture of ethanol / water 50% (w/w) (red line) observed by XRD (A) and by DSC (B in insert) (untreated BC, dark line).
Influence of concentration of catalyst MnCl2 and FeCl3·6H2O on Crystallinity Index, CrI.
| Integrated Area | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Catalyst Concentration (% | |||||||
| DP-BC | MnCl2 | FeCl3·6H2O | NCC 2 | ||||
| 0 | 1 | 2.5 | 5 | ||||
| Acr | 749.4 | 570.4 | 550.8 | 508.4 | 700.2 | 581.3 | 1068.1 |
| Aam | 335.2 | 249.3 | 221.7 | 191.0 | 181.4 | 747.2 | 186.6 |
| CrI | 69.1% | 69.6% | 71.3% | 72.7% | 79.4% | 77.8% | 85.1% |
2 NanoCrystal Cellulose, NCC (commercial).
Characteristic thermal behavior of sample celluloses.
| Temperature | Sample ( °C) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BC | DP-BC | MCC | BC-NC | NCC | |
| Tg | 105.0 | - | - | - | - |
| Tm | 113.8 | 348.7 | 314.1 | 282.8 | 278.7 |
| Td | 160.7 | 381.3 | 340.1 | 318.6 | 286.4 |