| Literature DB >> 30347724 |
Mahmood M S Abdullah1,2, Ayman M Atta3, Hamad A Allohedan4, Hamad Z Alkhathlan5, M Khan6, Abdelrahman O Ezzat7.
Abstract
In this study, an easy, rapid and eco-friendly method was used successfully to synthesize the magnetite nanoparticles (MNPs). In order to fine-tune the synthesized MNPs for the collection of heavy crude oil spills, the particles' surface was modified with green hydrophobic biocomponents that were extracted from Anthemis pseudocotula (AP). The surface modified reaction carried with that of the MNPs in the presence of n-hexane extract (APH) resulted in the formation of APH-MNPs, while in the presence of chloroform extract (APC), resulted in APC-MNPs formation. The as-formed MNPs were thoroughly characterized using transmittance electron microscopy, X-ray powder diffraction, vibrating sample magnetometer and thermogravimetric analysis. The efficiency of the surface-modified MNPs for the collection of oil spills in the presence of an external magnetic field was evaluated by taking different ratios of MNPs:crude oil. From the analysis of the results, we found that the APH-MNPs particles have higher efficiency in the collection of heavy crude oil than the corresponding APC-MNPs.Entities:
Keywords: Anthemis pseudocotula; green synthesis; magnetite nanoparticles; oil spill collectors; plant extract
Year: 2018 PMID: 30347724 PMCID: PMC6215231 DOI: 10.3390/nano8100855
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.076
Figure 1FT-IR (Fourier transform infrared) spectra of (a) APH (n-hexane extract), (b) APC (chloroform extract), (c) APH-MNPS (magnetite nanoparticles) and (d) APC-MNPs.
Figure 2XRD (X-ray powder diffraction) diffraction pattern of (a) APH-MNPs and (b) APC-MNPs.
Figure 3HR-TEM (High-resolution transmission electron microscopy) micrographs of (a) APH-MNPs and (b) APC-MNPs.
Figure 4Particle sizes distribution of (a) APH-MNPs and (b) APC-MNPs in ethanol.
Figure 5Zeta potential of (a) APH-MNPs and (b) APC-MNPs.
Dynamic light scattering results of APH-MNPs and APC-MNPs at 25 °C.
| Sample | Particle Size (nm) | Polydispersity Index | Zeta Potential (mV) |
|---|---|---|---|
| APH-MNPs | 565.1 | 0.338 | −6.53 |
| APC-MNPs | 308.8 | 0.229 | −37.14 |
Figure 6TGA (Thermal gravimetric analysis) thermogram of APH-MNPs and APC-MNPs.
Figure 7Contact angles of (a) APH-MNPs and (b) APC-MNPs.
Figure 8VSM (Vibrating sample magnetometer) hysteresis loop of APH-MNPs and APC-MNPs.
Magnetic parameters of APH-MNPs and APC-MNPs at 25 °C.
| Sample | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| APH-MNPs | 51.42 | 0.153 | 6.4 |
| APC-MNPs | 57.83 | 0.098 | 5.1 |
Oil spill collection results.
| Ratio | 1:1 | 1:10 | 1:25 | 1:50 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sample | |||||
| APH-MNPs | 92 | 90 | 88 | 83 | |
| APC-MNPs | 81 | 78 | 74 | 70 | |
Figure 9Efficiency of recycled MNPs in the collection of oil spill.