Literature DB >> 20138566

Multivariate analyses to assess the effect of surgeon volume on survival rate in oral cancer: a nationwide population-based study in Taiwan.

Ching-Chih Lee1, Hsu-Chueh Ho, Pesus Chou.   

Abstract

Patients with oral cancer utilize considerable health care resources, particularly when wide resection of the tumor and reconstruction with pedicle flap/free flap is performed. This study was conducted to explore the relationship between survival rates and surgeon volume. A total of 1256 patients who underwent resections for oral cancer in 2005 were identified from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database. Survival analysis, the Cox proportional regression model, and propensity score were used to evaluate the association between 3-year survival rates and surgeon caseloads. Oral cancer patients treated by high-volume surgeons (caseload 22-117) had better survival rates (hazard ratio [HR]=0.656; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.484-0.89; P=0.007) using the Cox proportional regression model after adjusting for patients' comorbid conditions, hospital, and surgeon characteristics. When analyzed by propensity score, the adjusted 3-year survival rate was 74% for patients treated by high-volume surgeons compared to 58% in the low/medium-volume group (P=0.019). We concluded that for patients who underwent oral cancer resection and reconstruction, after adjusting for differences in the case mix, high-volume surgeons had better 3-year survival rates. Treatment strategies adopted by high-volume surgeons should be analyzed further and utilized more widely. Crown Copyright 2010. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20138566     DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2010.01.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oral Oncol        ISSN: 1368-8375            Impact factor:   5.337


  7 in total

1.  The Associations of Hospital Volume, Surgeon Volume, and Surgeon Experience with Complications and 30-Day Rehospitalization after Free Tissue Transfer: A National Population Study.

Authors:  Elham Mahmoudi; Yiwen Lu; Shu-Chen Chang; Chia-Yu Lin; Yi-Chun Wang; Chee Jen Chang; Ming-Huei Cheng; Kevin C Chung
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 2.  The Case Volume Issue in Head and Neck Oncology.

Authors:  Salvatore Alfieri; Ester Orlandi; Paolo Bossi
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2017-10-27

3.  Association of Facility Volume With Positive Margin Rate in the Surgical Treatment of Head and Neck Cancer.

Authors:  Cheryl C Nocon; Gaurav S Ajmani; Mihir K Bhayani
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 6.223

4.  Effect of multidisciplinary team care on survival of oesophageal cancer patients: a retrospective nationwide cohort study.

Authors:  Pei-Tseng Kung; Wen-Chen Tsai; Yuan-Chun Huang; Shang-Yun Ho; Yeu-Sheng Tyan; Li-Ting Chiu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Salvage surgery for patients with residual/persistent diseases after improper or insufficient treatment of oral squamous cell carcinoma: can we rectify these mistakes?

Authors:  Yue He; Zhonglong Liu; Surui Sheng; Weijin Gao; Xiao Tang; Xiaoguang Li; Chunyue Ma
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2021-07-31       Impact factor: 4.430

6.  Renal transplantation: relationship between hospital/surgeon volume and postoperative severe sepsis/graft-failure. a nationwide population-based study.

Authors:  Shih-Feng Weng; Chin-Chen Chu; Chih-Chiang Chien; Jhi-Joung Wang; Yi-Chen Chen; Shang-Jyh Chiou
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 3.738

7.  Factors Influencing the Incidence of Severe Complications in Head and Neck Free Flap Reconstructions.

Authors:  Martin Broome; Naline Juilland; Yann Litzistorf; Yan Monnier; Kishore Sandu; Philippe Pasche; Peter K Plinkert; Philippe A Federspil; Christian Simon
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2016-10-27
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.