| Literature DB >> 30346948 |
Damián E Pérez-Mazliah1, Melisa D Castro Eiro1, María Gabriela Álvarez2, Bruno Lococo2, Graciela Bertocchi2, Gonzalo César1, María A Natale1, María C Albareda1, Rodolfo Viotti2, Susana A Laucella1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Chronic infection with Trypanosoma cruzi leads to a constant stimulation of the host immune system. Monocytes, which are recruited in response to inflammatory signals, are divided into classical CD14hiCD16-, non-classical CD14loCD16+ and intermediate CD14hiCD16+ subsets. In this study, we evaluated the frequencies of monocyte subsets in the different clinical stages of chronic Chagas disease in comparison with the monocyte profile of seronegative heart failure subjects and seronegative healthy controls. The effect of the anti-parasite drug therapy benznidazole on monocyte subsets was also explored. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPALEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30346948 PMCID: PMC6211766 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006887
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS Negl Trop Dis ISSN: 1935-2727
Characteristics of the study population.
| Study group | N | Age range | Years of residence | Gender | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | Female | ||||
| G0 | 23 | 21–60 (43) | 18 (1–42) | 8 | 15 |
| G1 | 6 | 24–58 (40) | 13 (1–23) | 5 | 1 |
| G2-G3 | 10 | 46–76 (54) | 20 (0–14) | 8 | 2 |
| Dilated cardiomyopathy | 8 | 34–64 (59) | 0 | 7 | 1 |
| Uninfected healthy controls | 17 | 21–58 (47) | 0 | 8 | 9 |
Note.
A Age at entry of the study.
B Seropositive subjects were grouped according to the modified Kuschnir classification [19,20].
C P < 0.05 compared with G2-G3 and dilated cardiomyopathy group by ANOVA followed by Bonferroni test.
D Three and seven T. cruzi-infected subjects were classified as G2 and G3 patients, respectively.
E P < 0.05 compared with uninfected healthy controls by ANOVA followed by Bonferroni test.
F Seronegative subjects with heart failure and without an epidemiological background for T. cruzi infection.
Fig 1Measurement of monocyte subsets in chronic Chagas disease patients and seronegative subjects with dilated cardiomyopathy.
(A) Representative plots for single subjects of the different clinical groups (i.e., G0, G1 and G2-G3 patient groups among untreated T. cruzi-infected subjects; seronegative subjects with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) and uninfected healthy controls) showing CD14 and CD16 expression. Monocytes were selected based on forward (FSC) and side scattering (SSC), and the different CD14+ monocyte subsets were analyzed by the expression of CD14 and CD16 using flow cytometry. (B) Each point represents the frequency of different monocyte subsets for individual subjects. The median values are indicated by the horizontal lines. * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001. Differences among groups were evaluated by ANOVA or the Kruskal-Wallis test followed by post-tests. (C) Classical, intermediate and non-classical monocyte subsets are depicted by the corresponding circles; each connecting line represents a significant interaction (P < 0.05) determined by Spearman’s correlation test.
Fig 2Phenotyping of the different monocyte subsets.
PBMCs were stained for CD14, CD16, CCR2, HLA-DR and CD45RA and analyzed by flow cytometry. Monocytes were gated by forward and side scattering. Each point represents the MFI for CD45RA (A) and CCR2 (B) in the different monocytes subsets among T.cruzi-infected subjects (G0 n = 21; G1-G2-G3 n = 7), seronegative dilated cardiomyopathy patients (DCM) (n = 5) and uninfected healthy controls (n = 6). Black diamonds indicate G1 benznidazole-treated patients; the black circle indicates a G2 benznidazole-treated patient. The median values are indicated by the horizontal lines. * P < 0.05; Differences among groups were evaluated by ANOVA, the Kruskal-Wallis test followed by post-tests or a t-test.
Fig 3Monitoring of monocyte subsets after drug therapy in subjects chronically infected with Trypanosoma cruzi.
(A) Monocyte subsets were measured prior to and after therapy with benznidazole in 12 T. cruzi-infected subjects (G0, black circles; G1, red diamonds). Changes in the monocyte subsets post-treatment relative to baseline were analyzed by a Linear Mixed Model. (B) Classical, intermediate, and non-classical monocyte subsets prior to and after treatment with benznidazole are depicted by the corresponding circles. Each connecting line represents a significant interaction (P < 0.05) determined by Spearman’s correlation test. (C) Correlation analysis between the baseline frequencies of classical or non-classical monocyte subsets and the ratio of post-treatment/pre-treatment T. cruzi-specific antibodies measured by ELISA at 12–24 months after treatment with benznidazole. Spearman’s correlation test between the frequency of CD14hiCD16– “classical Mo” and CD14loCD16+ “non-classical Mo” and the post-treatment/pretreatment ratio of the optical density obtained by the ELISA technique.
Mixed model analysis of non-classical and intermediate monocyte subsets in chronic Chagas disease patients following therapy with benznidazole according to baseline frequencies.
| Patient group | Dependent variable | No. of months Post-treatment | Estimate | 95% CI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Classical Mo 1 | CD14hiCD16—
| ||||
| (n = 6) | Month 2 | −4.84 | −18.95, 9.25 | 0.464 | |
| Month 6 | −1.14 | −15.24, 12.96 | 0.861 | ||
| Month 12 | −3.13 | −13.65, 7.38 | 0.525 | ||
| Classical Mo 2 | CD14hiCD16—
| ||||
| (n = 6) | Month 2 | 8.63 | 0.81, 18.07 | 0.071 | |
| Month 6 | 29.24 | 19.81, 38.68 | < 0.001 | ||
| Month 12 | 13.05 | 3.61, 22.48 | 0.010 | ||
| Month 24 | 16.96 | 6.59, 27.34 | 0.004 | ||
| Intermediate Mo 1 | CD14hiCD16+
| ||||
| (n = 6) | Month 2 | −10.36 | −15.81, −4.93 | 0.001 | |
| Month 6 | −15.57 | −20.99, -10.14 | < 0.001 | ||
| Month 12 | −6.04 | −11.33, −0.76 | 0.028 | ||
| Month 24 | −8.43 | −14.08, −2.77 | 0.006 | ||
| Intermediate Mo 2 | CD14hiCD16+
| ||||
| (n = 6) | Month 2 | 0.38 | −1.60, 2.36 | 0.69 | |
| Month 6 | 1.61 | −0.52, 3.73 | 0.13 | ||
| Month 12 | 1.56 | −0.32, 3.44 | 0.098 | ||
| Month 24 | 0.53 | −2.20, 3.26 | 0.69 | ||
| Non-classical Mo 1 | CD14loCD16+
| ||||
| (n = 6) | Month 2 | −6.22 | −10.94, −1.52 | 0.013 | |
| Month 6 | −13.18 | −17.87, −8.48 | < 0.001 | ||
| Month 12 | −5.26 | −9.95, −0.56 | 0.031 | ||
| Month 24 | −4.94 | −10.01, 0.14 | 0.050 | ||
| Non-classical Mo 2 | CD14loCD16+
| ||||
| (n = 6) | Month 2 | 10.46 | 5.52, -15,40 | 0.001 | |
| Month 6 | 0.77 | −4.16, 5.71 | 0.737 | ||
| Month 12 | 4.07 | 0.41, 7.74 | 0.032 |
Note.
A The estimate value for each time point post-treatment obtained by linear mixed model analysis indicates an approximation of the fold-change compared with the baseline. Negative values denote a decrease in the frequency of the indicated monocyte subset while positive values denote an increase in the frequency of the indicated monocyte subset compared with baseline;
B Subjects with frequencies of the indicated monocyte subset above median values (i.e., patient group 1);
C Subjects with frequencies of the indicated monocyte subset under median values (i.e., patient group 2).