Literature DB >> 30346795

In Vitro Assembly of Diverse Bacterial Microcompartment Shell Architectures.

Andrew R Hagen1, Jefferson S Plegaria2, Nancy Sloan1, Bryan Ferlez2, Clement Aussignargues2, Rodney Burton2, Cheryl A Kerfeld1,2,3.   

Abstract

Bacterial microcompartments (BMCs) are organelles composed of a selectively permeable protein shell that encapsulates enzymes involved in CO2 fixation (carboxysomes) or carbon catabolism (metabolosomes). Confinement of sequential reactions by the BMC shell presumably increases the efficiency of the pathway by reducing the crosstalk of metabolites, release of toxic intermediates, and accumulation of inhibitory products. Because BMCs are composed entirely of protein and self-assemble, they are an emerging platform for engineering nanoreactors and molecular scaffolds. However, testing designs for assembly and function through in vivo expression is labor-intensive and has limited the potential of BMCs in bioengineering. Here, we developed a new method for in vitro assembly of defined nanoscale BMC architectures: shells and nanotubes. By inserting a "protecting group", a short ubiquitin-like modifier (SUMO) domain, self-assembly of shell proteins in vivo was thwarted, enabling preparation of concentrates of shell building blocks. Addition of the cognate protease removes the SUMO domain and subsequent mixing of the constituent shell proteins in vitro results in the self-assembly of three types of supramolecular architectures: a metabolosome shell, a carboxysome shell, and a BMC protein-based nanotube. We next applied our method to generate a metabolosome shell engineered with a hyper-basic luminal surface, allowing for the encapsulation of biotic or abiotic cargos functionalized with an acidic accessory group. This is the first demonstration of using charge complementarity to encapsulate diverse cargos in BMC shells. Collectively, our work provides a generally applicable method for in vitro assembly of natural and engineered BMC-based architectures.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bacterial microcompartments; electrostatic-based encapsulation; in vitro supramolecular self-assembly; nanotubes; protein engineering; shells; structural biology

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30346795      PMCID: PMC6309364          DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b02991

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nano Lett        ISSN: 1530-6984            Impact factor:   11.189


  45 in total

Review 1.  Molecules into cells: specifying spatial architecture.

Authors:  Franklin M Harold
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 11.056

2.  Engineering and characterization of a superfolder green fluorescent protein.

Authors:  Jean-Denis Pédelacq; Stéphanie Cabantous; Timothy Tran; Thomas C Terwilliger; Geoffrey S Waldo
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2005-12-20       Impact factor: 54.908

3.  Protein structures forming the shell of primitive bacterial organelles.

Authors:  Cheryl A Kerfeld; Michael R Sawaya; Shiho Tanaka; Chau V Nguyen; Martin Phillips; Morgan Beeby; Todd O Yeates
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-08-05       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Analysis of carboxysomes from Synechococcus PCC7942 reveals multiple Rubisco complexes with carboxysomal proteins CcmM and CcaA.

Authors:  Benedict M Long; Murray R Badger; Spencer M Whitney; G Dean Price
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2007-08-03       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 5.  A library of protein cage architectures as nanomaterials.

Authors:  M L Flenniken; M Uchida; L O Liepold; S Kang; M J Young; T Douglas
Journal:  Curr Top Microbiol Immunol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 4.291

6.  Structural basis of enzyme encapsulation into a bacterial nanocompartment.

Authors:  Markus Sutter; Daniel Boehringer; Sascha Gutmann; Susanne Günther; David Prangishvili; Martin J Loessner; Karl O Stetter; Eilika Weber-Ban; Nenad Ban
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 15.369

7.  Structure of a trimeric bacterial microcompartment shell protein, EtuB, associated with ethanol utilization in Clostridium kluyveri.

Authors:  Dana Heldt; Stefanie Frank; Arefeh Seyedarabi; Dimitrios Ladikis; Joshua B Parsons; Martin J Warren; Richard W Pickersgill
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2009-09-25       Impact factor: 3.857

8.  A new protease required for cell-cycle progression in yeast.

Authors:  S J Li; M Hochstrasser
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-03-18       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  The propanediol utilization (pdu) operon of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium LT2 includes genes necessary for formation of polyhedral organelles involved in coenzyme B(12)-dependent 1, 2-propanediol degradation.

Authors:  T A Bobik; G D Havemann; R J Busch; D S Williams; H C Aldrich
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 3.490

10.  Hyper-acidic protein fusion partners improve solubility and assist correct folding of recombinant proteins expressed in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Zhurong Zou; Lijuan Cao; Pei Zhou; Yu Su; Yonghong Sun; Wenjuan Li
Journal:  J Biotechnol       Date:  2008-05-27       Impact factor: 3.307

View more
  14 in total

1.  A designed bacterial microcompartment shell with tunable composition and precision cargo loading.

Authors:  Bryan Ferlez; Markus Sutter; Cheryl A Kerfeld
Journal:  Metab Eng       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 9.783

2.  Structural Characterization of a Synthetic Tandem-Domain Bacterial Microcompartment Shell Protein Capable of Forming Icosahedral Shell Assemblies.

Authors:  Markus Sutter; Sean McGuire; Bryan Ferlez; Cheryl A Kerfeld
Journal:  ACS Synth Biol       Date:  2019-03-27       Impact factor: 5.110

3.  Vertex protein PduN tunes encapsulated pathway performance by dictating bacterial metabolosome morphology.

Authors:  Carolyn E Mills; Curt Waltmann; Andre G Archer; Nolan W Kennedy; Charlotte H Abrahamson; Alexander D Jackson; Eric W Roth; Sasha Shirman; Michael C Jewett; Niall M Mangan; Monica Olvera de la Cruz; Danielle Tullman-Ercek
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 17.694

4.  Chemical probing provides insight into the native assembly state of a bacterial microcompartment.

Authors:  Daniel S Trettel; William Resager; Beatrix M Ueberheide; Conor C Jenkins; Wade C Winkler
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 5.871

Review 5.  Engineering spatiotemporal organization and dynamics in synthetic cells.

Authors:  Alessandro Groaz; Hossein Moghimianavval; Franco Tavella; Tobias W Giessen; Anthony G Vecchiarelli; Qiong Yang; Allen P Liu
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol       Date:  2020-11-21

6.  Single-Organelle Quantification Reveals Stoichiometric and Structural Variability of Carboxysomes Dependent on the Environment.

Authors:  Yaqi Sun; Adam J M Wollman; Fang Huang; Mark C Leake; Lu-Ning Liu
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2019-05-02       Impact factor: 11.277

7.  Validation of an insertion-engineered isoprene synthase as a strategy to functionalize terpene synthases.

Authors:  C Raul Gonzalez-Esquer; Bryan Ferlez; Sarathi M Weraduwage; Henning Kirst; Alexandra T Lantz; Aiko Turmo; Thomas D Sharkey; Cheryl A Kerfeld
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2021-09-08       Impact factor: 3.361

8.  Occurrence and stability of hetero-hexamer associations formed by β-carboxysome CcmK shell components.

Authors:  Luis F Garcia-Alles; Katharina Root; Laurent Maveyraud; Nathalie Aubry; Eric Lesniewska; Lionel Mourey; Renato Zenobi; Gilles Truan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-10-11       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Mechanisms of Scaffold-Mediated Microcompartment Assembly and Size Control.

Authors:  Farzaneh Mohajerani; Evan Sayer; Christopher Neil; Koe Inlow; Michael F Hagan
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 15.881

10.  Apparent size and morphology of bacterial microcompartments varies with technique.

Authors:  Nolan W Kennedy; Jasmine M Hershewe; Taylor M Nichols; Eric W Roth; Charlene D Wilke; Carolyn E Mills; Michael C Jewett; Danielle Tullman-Ercek
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.