Irene Marco-Rius1, Tian Cheng1, Adam P Gaunt1, Saket Patel2, Felix Kreis1, Andrea Capozzi3, Alan J Wright1, Kevin M Brindle1, Olivier Ouari2, Arnaud Comment1,4. 1. Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge , Li Ka Shin Center, Robinson Way, Cambridge CB2 0RE , U.K. 2. Aix-Marseille University , CNRS, ICR, 13007 Marseille , France. 3. Department of Electrical Engineering, Center for Hyperpolarization in Magnetic Resonance , Technical University of Denmark , 2800 Kgs. , Lyngby , Denmark. 4. General Electric Healthcare , HP7 9NA Chalfont St. Giles , U.K.
Abstract
Whether for 13C magnetic resonance studies in chemistry, biochemistry, or biomedicine, hyperpolarization methods based on dynamic nuclear polarization (DNP) have become ubiquitous. DNP requires a source of unpaired electrons, which are commonly added to the sample to be hyperpolarized in the form of stable free radicals. Once polarized, the presence of these radicals is unwanted. These radicals can be replaced by nonpersistent radicals created by the photoirradiation of pyruvic acid (PA), which are annihilated upon dissolution or thermalization in the solid state. However, since PA is readily metabolized by most cells, its presence may be undesirable for some metabolic studies. In addition, some 13C substrates are photosensitive and therefore may degrade during the photogeneration of a PA radical, which requires ultraviolet (UV) light. We show here that the photoirradiation of phenylglyoxylic acid (PhGA) using visible light produces a nonpersistent radical that, in principle, can be used to hyperpolarize any molecule. We compare radical yields in samples containing PA and PhGA upon photoirradiation with broadband and narrowband UV-visible light sources. To demonstrate the suitability of PhGA as a radical precursor for DNP, we polarized the gluconeogenic probe 13C-dihydroxyacetone, which is UV-sensitive, using a commercial 3.35 T DNP polarizer and then injected this into a mouse and followed its metabolism in vivo.
Whether for 13C magnetic resonance studies in chemistry, biochemistry, or biomedicine, hyperpolarization methods based on dynamic nuclear polarization (DNP) have become ubiquitous. DNP requires a source of unpaired electrons, which are commonly added to the sample to be hyperpolarized in the form of stable free radicals. Once polarized, the presence of these radicals is unwanted. These radicals can be replaced by nonpersistent radicals created by the photoirradiation of pyruvic acid (PA), which are annihilated upon dissolution or thermalization in the solid state. However, since PA is readily metabolized by most cells, its presence may be undesirable for some metabolic studies. In addition, some 13C substrates are photosensitive and therefore may degrade during the photogeneration of a PA radical, which requires ultraviolet (UV) light. We show here that the photoirradiation of phenylglyoxylic acid (PhGA) using visible light produces a nonpersistent radical that, in principle, can be used to hyperpolarize any molecule. We compare radical yields in samples containing PA and PhGA upon photoirradiation with broadband and narrowband UV-visible light sources. To demonstrate the suitability of PhGA as a radical precursor for DNP, we polarized the gluconeogenic probe 13C-dihydroxyacetone, which is UV-sensitive, using a commercial 3.35 T DNP polarizer and then injected this into a mouse and followed its metabolism in vivo.
Hyperpolarization by
dissolution dynamic nuclear polarization (DNP)
can enhance the magnetic resonance (MR) signals of molecules in solution
by up to 5 orders of magnitude.[1] As the
list of molecules that have been hyperpolarized increases every year,
so do applications across organic and polymer chemistry[2] as well as biomedicine.[3] DNP is based on the transfer of spin polarization from unpaired
electrons of stable free radicals to nuclei at cryogenic temperatures.
Stable radicals such as trityls, nitroxides, and 1,3-bisdiphenylene-2-phenylallyl
(BDPA) are admixed with the sample containing the molecule to be hyperpolarized.[4] A consequence of having to introduce stable radicals
is that they accelerate nuclear spin relaxation, which may cause significant
signal loss during the dissolution process. A concern for applications
in the biomedical field, where dissolution DNP has seen a rapid translation
from the laboratory to the clinic,[5−7] is the potential radical
toxicity. Medical regulatory bodies currently demand that radicals
are filtered out prior to injection into a human subject,[8,9] which adds to the complexity of the process and becomes a potential
failure point before the release of the solution for injection.Nonpersistent photoinduced free radicals generated by ultraviolet
(UV) light irradiation of pyruvic acid (PA) have been proposed as
an alternative to the persistent radicals used in dissolution DNP.[10] Recently it has been demonstrated that these
nonpersistent radicals can be annihilated inside a frozen sample by
warming it to ∼200 K. After this point, the nuclear spin hyperpolarization
can persist for several hours,[11] making
it possible to transport the sample for use at a distant location.
Several 13C-labeled metabolic substrates have been hyperpolarized
using PA as a precursor molecule for the photogeneration of radicals.[12,13] However, when PA itself is not one of the substrates of interest,[10,13] metabolic interference caused by its presence may be undesirable.
Furthermore, PA cannot be considered to be a universal polarizing
agent because some metabolic substrates are photosensitive and can
degrade during exposure to UV light when generating the radical. One
example of this problem is [2-13C]dihydroxyacetone (DHAc),
which has been previously hyperpolarized with OX063 trityl radical
and used to study gluconeogenesis, glycolysis, and fatty acid synthesis
in the liver.[14−16] DHAc absorbs light below 300 nm, leading to sample
degradation.[17] Finally, dimethyl sulfoxide
(DMSO), which is frequently used as a glassing agent for the preparation
of DNP samples, is also photosensitive.The purpose of this
work is to demonstrate that phenylglyoxylic
acid (PhGA) can also be used as an efficient radical precursor for
DNP. PhGA has an excellent safety profile and no reported effect on
metabolism on the time scale of the hyperpolarized 13C
MR experiments.[18] Because of its extended
absorption into the visible spectrum, a radical can be photogenerated
in PhGA at longer wavelengths and can therefore be used in conjunction
with molecules that are sensitive to UV light. We show that [2-13C]DHAc can be hyperpolarized using the photogenerated radical
of PhGA and a commercial 3.35 T HyperSense polarizer and that the
resulting solution can be used for 13C MR metabolic studies
in vivo.
Experimental Section
All chemicals
were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Haverhill, U.K.),
and data were processed in MATLAB (Mathworks, Natick, MA, USA), unless
stated otherwise.
UV–Vis Absorption Measurements
The ultraviolet–visible
(UV–vis) absorption spectra of PhGA, PA, DHAc, and DMSO in
water (146 mM, 600 μL) were recorded using an Ocean Optics USB2000+
spectrometer and a DH-2000-BAL UV–vis–NIR light source
(Halma PLC, Amersham, U.K.).To estimate the efficiency of broadband
and narrowband UV–vis light sources in generating photoinduced
radicals in PA and PhGA, the power profile of each source (provided
by the manufacturer) was multiplied by the absorption spectrum of
PA and PhGA between 300 and 420 nm (Figure ). The integral of the multiplied spectra
was used to compare the effective light intensity provided by each
source.
Figure 1
UV–vis absorption spectra (left axis) and light source power
distributions (right axis). Power profiles were provided by the manufacturer
(Dymax Europe GmbH, Wiesbaden, Germany).
UV–vis absorption spectra (left axis) and light source power
distributions (right axis). Power profiles were provided by the manufacturer
(Dymax Europe GmbH, Wiesbaden, Germany).
Broadband and Narrowband Photoirradiation
To investigate
the effects of photoirradiation on the selected radical precursors,
two solutions were prepared: neat PA diluted to 7.0 M in a mixture
of 1:1 glycerol/water (v/v) and sonicated for 5 min at 40 °C
and a sample containing 7.1 M PhGA in a mixture of 1:1 glycerol/water
(v/v) sonicated for 5 min at 40 °C. To study the relationship
among the PhGA concentration, light source, and radical yield, the
7.1 M PhGA sample was diluted to 50, 25, and 7% of the original PhGA
concentration in a mixture of 1:1 glycerol/water (v/v). Additionally,
the effect of the light sources on two photosensitive solutions was
tested: neat dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and a sample containing 8.0
M DHAc dissolved in 2H2O were sonicated for
10 min at 40 °C.Frozen beads of each solution were formed
by dispensing droplets from a syringe into an ESR quartz dewar flask
(Wilmad-Lab Glass WG-850-B-Q, Goss Scientific, Crewe, U.K.) filled
with liquid nitrogen (LN2). The beads were photoirradiated
using either a broadband source (Dymax BlueWave 75, Dymax Europe GmbH,
Wiesbaden, Germany) or a narrowband source (Dymax BlueWave LED VisiCure
405 nm, Dymax Europe GmbH, Wiesbaden, Germany) operating at maximum
power. From this point onward these two sources are referred to as
BlueWave 75 and VisiCure 405. The standard used for UV irradiation
is described in ref (19). Note that transmission through the quartz dewar was the same across
the entire range of wavelengths used in this study.[20]
X-Band ESR Measurements and Radical Concentration
Estimation
ESR spectra of single frozen beads inside the
quartz dewar filled
with LN2 were acquired using a benchtop X-band ESR spectrometer
(MiniScope MS5000, Magnettech GmbH, Berlin, Germany). ESR parameters
were optimized to resolve the hyperfine structure of the spectra and
then kept constant throughout all of the experiments (number of accumulations
= 1, B = [323-353] mT, sweep time = 20 s,
modulation amplitude = 0.1 mT, modulation frequency = 100 kHz, and
microwave power = 0.2 mW). Sequential ESR spectra were acquired for
each bead after different irradiation times to obtain a radical build-up
curve (Supporting Information Figure 2).
The effect of deuterating PhGA on the ESR line width was investigated
by substituting protonated PhGA in water for perdeuterated PhGA (d5-PhGA) in 2H2O. The synthesis
of d5-PhGA is detailed in the Supporting Information.Following ESR signal
acquisition, the frozen bead was extracted from the quartz dewar,
inserted into an Eppendorf tube, and weighed to estimate the volume
of the bead. The radical concentration was determined by comparing
the double integration of the first derivative ESR spectrum, corrected
for bead volume (∼4 μL), with a calibration curve obtained
from beads of known concentrations of 4-hydroxy-2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine
1-oxyl (TEMPOL, Supporting Information Figure 1). Each measurement was repeated at least twice.
Dynamic Nuclear
Polarization
Four samples were prepared
for dissolution DNP: (sample 1) 8 M [2-13C]DHAc and 1 M
PhGA in water; (sample 2) 8 M [2-13C]DHAc, 1 M PhGA, and
1.2 mM gadoteric acid (Gd3+, Dotarem, Guerbet, Roissy,
France) in water; (sample 3) 8 M [2-13C]DHAc, 1 M d5-PhGA, and 1.2 mM Gd3+ in 2H2O; and (sample 4) 8 M [2-13C]DHAc, 21 mM
OX063 trityl radical (Albeda Research Aps, Copenhagen, Denmark), and
1.2 mM Gd3+ in 1:3 DMSO/water (v/v). All solutions were
sonicated for 5 min at 50 °C before the addition of Gd3+. The choice of PhGA concentration in samples 1–3 was based
on the fact that hyperpolarized DHAc had previously been polarized
with 21 mM OX063,[14−16] a radical with a similar ESR line width to that obtained
after the photoirradiation of PhGA, and that a similar concentration
of the photogenerated radical (18–20 mM) can be obtained if
the samples are doped with 1 M PhGA.Between 7 and 11 beads
of samples 1–3 were simultaneously irradiated for 200 s with
the VisiCure 405 source. The beads were then placed into a standard
HyperSense sample holder in contact with LN2 to preserve
the radical and rapidly inserted into a HyperSense polarizer operating
at 3.35 T and 1.25 K (Oxford Instruments, Abingdon, U.K). A microwave
(μ-wave) sweep between 94.07 and 94.22 GHz (10 MHz steps, 10
min μ-wave irradiation/step) was performed for samples 2–4
and for a sample containing 7 M [1-13C]PA in 1:1 glycerol/water
(v/v) irradiated for 400 s with the BlueWave 75 source. The background
signal measured at each μ-wave frequency was subtracted from
all μ-wave sweeps. For dissolution DNP, samples were polarized
with the μ-wave source set to 94.110 GHz (except the sample
used for the in vivo experiment, which was polarized at 94.205 GHz)
and 100 mW for a period of 1.5–2 h. The samples were dissolved
with 6 mL of a phosphate saline buffer (PBS).
Hyperpolarized 13C MR in a Phantom at 7 T
Liquid-state 13C MR
acquisitions were carried out in a
small-animal horizontal bore 7 T MR scanner (Agilent, Palo Alto, CA)
using a 42-mm-diameter bird-cage 1H/13C transmit
volume coil and a 20-mm-outer-diameter 13C receive surface
coil (Rapid Biomedical GmbH, Rimpar, Germany). The temporal evolution
of the hyperpolarized 13C signal was recorded in a 3 mL
phantom starting 16 ± 1 s after dissolution using the following
parameters: repetition time = 1 s, nominal flip angle = 9°, pulse
width = 400 μs (sinc pulse truncated to five lobes), spectral
width = 32 kHz. T1 relaxation time constants were determined
by fitting an exponential decay function to the data and were corrected
for the flip angle. (See the Supporting Information for details on the mathematical formula.)The thermal equilibrium 13C MR signal was acquired with the same parameters but a longer
repetition time (∼5 × T1),
and the 13C hyperpolarization at the time of the first
acquisition was calculated as the ratio between the hyperpolarized
and thermal signals multiplied by the theoretical equilibrium polarization
at 7 T and 298 K.
In Vivo Hyperpolarized 13C MR
at 7 T
Procedures
were performed in compliance with project and personal licenses issued
under the United Kingdom Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act, 1986
and were approved by the Cancer Research UK, Cambridge Institute Animal
Welfare and Ethical Review Body. A female C57B6 mouse (body weight
= 32.2 g) was anesthetized with 2% isoflurane. Its body temperature
was maintained at 37 °C, and it was placed inside the 7 T MR
system. The coil setup was identical to the one used for the phantom
experiments (a 42-mm-diameter bird-cage 1H/13C transmit volume coil and a 20-mm-outer-diameter 13C
receive surface coil; Rapid Biomedical GMBH, Rimpar, Germany), with
the receive surface coil placed over the liver of the mouse. Positioning
of the surface coil was confirmed with sagittal, coronal, and axial
T2-weighted 1H images.Photoirradiated
beads (∼30 μL) from sample 2 were polarized as described
above with μ-wave irradiation at 94.205 GHz and dissolved in
6 mL of PBS. This solution (400 μL) was injected into the mouse
via a tail vein over a period of 3 s. 13C MR acquisition
started 12 s after the injection. The parameters used for 13C MR acquisition were the following: repetition time = 0.2 s, nominal
flip angle = 15°, pulse width = 2 ms (sinc pulse truncated to
five lobes), spectral width = 6 kHz, and total acquisition time =
80 s. The transmitter was centered at 72.3 ppm, and every 10th acquisition
it was switched to 214 ppm for a single acquisition before returning
to 72.3 ppm. Therefore, the spectral region around 72.3 ppm was sampled
360 times (every 0.2 s), and the region around 214 ppm was sampled
40 times (every 2 s). This high temporal resolution acquisition strategy
was chosen to maximize the signal-to-noise ratio of the summed spectra
assuming an in vivo T1 of 10 s for the
metabolites. (See the analysis presented in ref (21).) A similar scheme has
previously been used for the detection of glucose metabolism in vivo.[22,23] The volume coil excited the whole body, and reception was coil-selective.
Liquid-State 13C MR at 14.1 T
Following
the hyperpolarized 13C phantom experiments, the samples
obtained after dissolution were mixed with 10% 2H2O, and their thermally polarized 13C MR spectrum was measured
in a 600 MHz vertical-bore Bruker spectrometer (Bruker BioSpin GmbH,
Rheinstetten, Germany). To further investigate the impact of photoirradiation
on the solutions containing PhGA, the 13C spectra of two
additional samples prepared by dissolving either a nonirradiated bead
or a 200-s-irradiated bead (using VisiCure 405) in 600 μL PBS
(10% 2H2O) were recorded for comparison. All
four samples were measured with the following parameters: repetition
time = 6 s, nominal flip angle = 30°, pulse width = 2.6 μs
(hard pulse), and spectral width = 38 kHz. T1 values were measured using an inversion recovery sequence.
Results
UV–Vis Absorption and Light Source Power Profiles
The UV–vis spectra of the two precursors studied here show
that PhGA has a broad absorption between 200 and 400 nm while PA has
a weaker and narrower absorption at around λmax =
320 nm corresponding to the n−π* electronic transition
characteristic of α-ketoacids.[24] Metabolic substrate DHAc has an absorption peak at around
λmax = 270 nm, and the DMSO solvent has one at around
λmax = 240 nm (Figure ).The power dependence of the two light sources
on wavelength was obtained from the manufacturer’s manual and
is overlaid on Figure . While the total output power density was nearly the same for both
light sources (19 W/cm2 for BlueWave 75 and 16.8 W/cm2 for VisiCure 405), the power distribution across the spectrum
was radically different. On the basis of the multiplied spectra calculated
from the UV–vis absorption of PA and PhGA and the wavelength-dependent
power distribution of each light source, the BlueWave 75 light source
was expected to be more effective for radical generation in PA while
the VisiCure 405 source should be better suited for radical generation
in PhGA since the ratio areabroadband/area405 nm is much larger for PA than for PhGA (15 vs 2.8).
Broadband and
Narrowband Photoirradiation
PhGA and
PA were irradiated with either the BlueWave 75 broadband light source
or the VisiCure 405 narrowband light source. The associated ESR spectra
are displayed in Figure a,b. The scheme of the photochemical pathway for radical production
in PhGA and PA at 77 K is shown in the Supporting Information. Frozen PA and PhGA beads turned a yellow-orange
color after irradiation, which became darker as the irradiation time
increased (Figure a).
Figure 2
X-band ESR spectra of frozen droplets in LN2, photoirradiated
with a broadband (BlueWave 75) or a narrowband (VisiCure 405) light
source. (a) PhGA (7.1 M) in 1:1 water/glycerol (v/v). (b) PA (7.0
M) in 1:1 water/glycerol (v/v). (c) DMSO (neat). (d) DHAc (8.0 M)
in 2H2O. The spectral structures in panels b
and c are caused by the hyperfine coupling to the proton spins of
the methyl groups. The units on the y axis are the
same in all four plots.
Figure 3
Photoirradiation of PhGA dissolved in 1:1 glycerol/water (v/v).
(a) A 4 μL bead of PhGA in LN2 before and after photoirradiation.
(b) ESR spectrum of unlabeled PhGA and d5-PhGA. (c) Maximum radical yield vs PhGA concentration using either
the broadband (blue open circle) or the narrowband light source (red
dots). The radical yield is reported as the mean ± standard deviation
across three measurements.
X-band ESR spectra of frozen droplets in LN2, photoirradiated
with a broadband (BlueWave 75) or a narrowband (VisiCure 405) light
source. (a) PhGA (7.1 M) in 1:1 water/glycerol (v/v). (b) PA (7.0
M) in 1:1 water/glycerol (v/v). (c) DMSO (neat). (d) DHAc (8.0 M)
in 2H2O. The spectral structures in panels b
and c are caused by the hyperfine coupling to the proton spins of
the methyl groups. The units on the y axis are the
same in all four plots.Photoirradiation of PhGA dissolved in 1:1 glycerol/water (v/v).
(a) A 4 μL bead of PhGA in LN2 before and after photoirradiation.
(b) ESR spectrum of unlabeled PhGA and d5-PhGA. (c) Maximum radical yield vs PhGA concentration using either
the broadband (blue open circle) or the narrowband light source (red
dots). The radical yield is reported as the mean ± standard deviation
across three measurements.Table summarizes
the radical yield for each precursor and light source. BlueWave 75
yielded 3.3 times more radical and was 3 times faster than VisiCure
405 when PA was the precursor. Conversely, the irradiation of PhGA
with VisiCure 405 resulted in a 1.6-fold increase in radical yield
compared to broadband irradiation, without a reduction in the build-up
time. The radical yield increased with PhGA concentration (Figure c). It is noticeable
that irradiation with either BlueWave 75 or the narrowband light source
produced similar radical yields in solutions with PhGA concentrations
below 1.77 M. However, irradiation with BlueWave 75 generated lower
radical yields at higher PhGA concentrations.
Table 1
Maximum
Radical Yield after Photoirradiation
precursor
radical yield (mM) BlueWave 75
radical yield (mM) VisiCure 405
PhGA (7.1M)
25.7 ± 3.7
40.4 ± 5.8
PA (7.0M)
77.7 ± 11.2
23.8 ± 3.4
The ESR line width of PhGA was about 3 times narrower than that
of PA. Perdeuteration of PhGA (d5-PhGA)
resulted in an ∼10% narrower ESR line width than protonated
PhGA (fwhm = 1.30 ± 0.05 mT vs fwhm = 1.45 ± 0.05 mT, Figure b) but did not change
the radical yield.Photosensitive metabolite DHAc and glassing
agent DMSO were also
irradiated with both light sources. Irradiation of DMSO and DHAc with
BlueWave 75 produced radicals that were clearly observed in the ESR
spectra, while irradiation with VisiCure 405 did not generate any
observable radical (Figure c,d).
DNP of [2-13C]DHAc with a PhGA-Derived
Radical
The samples containing 8 M [2-13C]DHAc
and 1 M PhGA
(or d5-PhGA) in water were strongly acidic
(pH = 0.5 ± 0.5). A 200 s irradiation with VisiCure 405 was sufficient
to reach a plateau in radical production with a yield of 18.1 ±
2.5 mM in the samples with and without Gd3+. (The variability
of five measurements was ±0.5 mM.) No ESR signal originating
from the photoirradiation of a 1 mM solution of Gd3+ in
water could be detected (data not shown).The width of the μ-wave
spectrum of samples containing radical generated by the photolysis
of PhGA was noticeably broader than the spectrum of the PA sample
containing OX063 trityl radical but narrower than that for photoirradiated
PA (Figure ). However,
unlike OX063, the μ-wave spectrum of the PhGA-derived radical
was strongly asymmetric, with approximately 1.7 times higher 13C polarization when the μ-wave frequency is set to
the value corresponding to the optimal negative polarization, namely,
94.205 ± 0.005 GHz. The build-up rate was, however, identical
for both the negative and positive optimal frequencies, and there
was no noticeable difference when unlabeled PhGA was replaced with d5-PhGA (Supporting Information Figure 3).
Figure 4
Solid-state microwave spectra at 3.35 T and 1.25 K: (open
red circles)
photoirradiated [2-13C]DHAc solution (8 M) in H2O doped with 1 M PhGA (18 mM radical); (black dots) [2-13C]DHAc solution (8 M) in H2O/DMSO (v/v) doped with 21
mM OX063; (green triangles) photoirradiated [1-13C]PA solution
(7 M) in H2O/glycerol (65 mM radical).
Solid-state microwave spectra at 3.35 T and 1.25 K: (open
red circles)
photoirradiated [2-13C]DHAc solution (8 M) in H2O doped with 1 M PhGA (18 mM radical); (black dots) [2-13C]DHAc solution (8 M) in H2O/DMSO (v/v) doped with 21
mM OX063; (green triangles) photoirradiated [1-13C]PA solution
(7 M) in H2O/glycerol (65 mM radical).
Hyperpolarized [2-13C]DHAc
The build-up
time constants as well as the liquid-state 13C polarization
were measured for all of the [2-13C]DHAc samples (Table ). The build-up time
constant in samples containing PhGA was not affected by the addition
of Gd3+ or the perdeuteration of PhGA. However, the liquid-state
polarization increased by 1.7-fold upon addition of 1.2 mM Gd3+. The polarization values shown in Table were measured approximately 16 s after the
start of the dissolution process, which means that the estimated 13C polarization at the time of dissolution was ∼8%
for the samples doped with Gd3+ and polarized with the
μ-wave frequency set to 94.110 GHz. On the basis of the solid-state
data, the 13C polarization at the time of dissolution should
reach ∼14% if this sample was negatively polarized at 94.205
GHz.
Table 2
DNP Results Obtained with 8 M [2-13C]DHAc Samples Polarized Using a HyperSense Polarizer with
Liquid-State Polarizations Measured 16 s after Dissolution at 7 T
[2-13C] DHAc doped with
build-up
time constant (s)
liquid-state 13C polarization (%)
(1) PhGA
1033 ± 82
3.1 ± 0.8
(2) PhGA and Gd3+
1023 ± 97
5.1 ± 1.2
(3) d5-PhGA and Gd3+
862 ± 81
4.7 ± 1.0
(4) Trityl and Gd3+
1611 ± 353
16.0 ± 4.0
After dissolution, the pH was neutral in all cases (pH = 7.0 ±
0.5). The 13C longitudinal relaxation time constant (T1) of [2-13C]DHAc with PhGA was 35.2
± 1.8 s at 7 T and 19.9 ± 1.0 s at 14.1 T. Radical quenching
was confirmed by making seven frozen beads from the dissolved sample
and averaging 100 ESR measurements to compensate for the dilution
following dissolution. As confirmation, no ESR signal was observed.[2-13C]DHAc (213.9 ppm) and [2-13C]DHAc hydrate
(96.6 ppm) dominated the hyperpolarized 13C spectrum recorded
in the 7 T MR scanner (Figure a). The two peaks at 199.4 and 175.3 ppm correspond to the
resonances of [1-13C]PhGA and [2-13C]PhGA, respectively.
No recombination products from the quenched radical were detected
in the hyperpolarized 13C spectrum. A few impurities from
the [2-13C]DHAc sample were observed at chemical shifts
of 91.6, 94.9, 108.1, 105.9, and 112.7 ppm. The same small quantities
of impurities were also detected in the same solution before it had
been UV-irradiated or polarized by DNP (Figure b-iii). No additional peaks were detected
in the thermally polarized spectra of the samples that had undergone
photoirradiation or photoirradiation and subsequent DNP (Figure b).
Figure 5
(a) Representative 13C MR spectrum (sum of 180 spectra)
of a hyperpolarized solution containing 40 mM [2-13C]DHAc,
5 mM PhGA, and 6 μM Gd3+ in PBS. The MR acquisition
started 16 s after the beginning of the dissolution process with a
repetition time of 1 s and a nominal flip angle of 9°. (b) 13C MR spectra of thermally polarized solutions at 300 K and
14.1 T. All samples contained [2-13C]DHAc (40 mM-70 mM)
and PhGA (4.5–8.0 mM) in PBS with 10% 2H2O. [13C]urea was added to samples i and ii after dissolution
as a reference. These samples were made from frozen beads of 8 M [2-13C]DHAc and 1 M PhGA in water. (i) Frozen beads had been irradiated
using a narrowband light source (VisiCure 405 nm) for 200 s and dissolution
DNP performed on them. (ii) 1.2 mM Gd3+ had been added
to the sample prior to photoirradiation and dissolution DNP. (iii)
The frozen beads were dissolved in PBS without photoirradiation or
DNP. (iv) The frozen beads were irradiated for 200 s and melted in
PBS, but they did not undergo dissolution DNP.
(a) Representative 13C MR spectrum (sum of 180 spectra)
of a hyperpolarized solution containing 40 mM [2-13C]DHAc,
5 mM PhGA, and 6 μM Gd3+ in PBS. The MR acquisition
started 16 s after the beginning of the dissolution process with a
repetition time of 1 s and a nominal flip angle of 9°. (b) 13C MR spectra of thermally polarized solutions at 300 K and
14.1 T. All samples contained [2-13C]DHAc (40 mM-70 mM)
and PhGA (4.5–8.0 mM) in PBS with 10% 2H2O. [13C]urea was added to samples i and ii after dissolution
as a reference. These samples were made from frozen beads of 8 M [2-13C]DHAc and 1 M PhGA in water. (i) Frozen beads had been irradiated
using a narrowband light source (VisiCure 405 nm) for 200 s and dissolution
DNP performed on them. (ii) 1.2 mM Gd3+ had been added
to the sample prior to photoirradiation and dissolution DNP. (iii)
The frozen beads were dissolved in PBS without photoirradiation or
DNP. (iv) The frozen beads were irradiated for 200 s and melted in
PBS, but they did not undergo dissolution DNP.In comparison, a sample prepared with [2-13C]DHAc
doped
with 21 mM OX063 and 1.2 mM Gd3+ polarized nearly 1.6 times
slower than the samples with the PhGA-derived radical but reached
three times higher liquid-state polarization levels (Table ). Interestingly, the T1 at 7 T after dissolution of the [2-13C]DHAc sample with OX063 was 29.5 ± 0.5 s, ∼5 s shorter
than that of the sample with a nonpersistent PhGA-derived radical.
It was also slightly shorter at 14.1 T, where T1 was 17.3 ± 1.4 s for [2-13C]DHAc with OX063.
Note that the presence of 6 μM of Gd3+ in the solution
did not affect the T1 of [2-13C]DHAc.
In Vivo 13C MR of Hyperpolarized [2-13C]DHAc Metabolism
The 13C MR spectrum after the
intravenous injection of 400 μL of a hyperpolarized solution
containing 40 mM [2-13C]DHAc, 5 mM PhGA, and 6 μM
Gd3+ into a 32.2 g mouse is shown in Figure . The injection of this solution did not
cause any observable changes in the heart rate or respiratory pattern
of the mouse. Since this sample was negatively polarized at 94.205
GHz, the 13C polarization was estimated to be 8.7% at the
time of injection, which is 1.7 times higher than the 13C polarization recorded for the same sample positively polarized
at 94.110 GHz (Table ). Besides the injected DHAc and its hydrate, metabolic products
were detected between 69 and 77 ppm. Note that the resonance appearing
at ∼89 ppm has previously been reported in earlier in vivo
studies,[15] but it has not been assigned.
The peaks at 73.8 and 71.8 ppm could be seen for the first 20 s (first
90 acquisitions), and DHAc could be monitored for approximately 60
s (29 acquisitions). The T1 of [2-13C]DHAc was determined to be 15.8 ± 0.3 s in vivo.
Figure 6
(a) Axial and
sagittal T2-weighted
images through the mouse with approximate position of the surface
coil. (Red dots represent the cross sections of the coil.) (b) 13C MR spectrum acquired in vivo at 7 T following the intravenous
injection of 400 μL of a hyperpolarized solution into a mouse.
The solution was composed of 40 mM [2-13C]DHAc, 5 mM PhGA,
and 6 μM Gd3+ in PBS. The previously reported resonance
detected at ∼89 ppm has not been assigned. DHAc region: sum
of 40 spectra. Region with the metabolic products of DHAc and DHAc
hydrate: sum of the first 70 spectra.
(a) Axial and
sagittal T2-weighted
images through the mouse with approximate position of the surface
coil. (Red dots represent the cross sections of the coil.) (b) 13C MR spectrum acquired in vivo at 7 T following the intravenous
injection of 400 μL of a hyperpolarized solution into a mouse.
The solution was composed of 40 mM [2-13C]DHAc, 5 mM PhGA,
and 6 μM Gd3+ in PBS. The previously reported resonance
detected at ∼89 ppm has not been assigned. DHAc region: sum
of 40 spectra. Region with the metabolic products of DHAc and DHAc
hydrate: sum of the first 70 spectra.
Discussion
PhGA as a Radical Precursor for DNP
Nonpersistent radicals
can be created through UV–vis light irradiation of a precursor
molecule. Although this is a simple procedure, the intense light used
for the photogeneration of radicals may affect and degrade other molecules
that are present in the sample. This is not the case for acetate or
butyrate, which can be used in conjunction with PA,[12,13] but some solvents (e.g., DMSO) and some metabolic substrates that
are used with hyperpolarized 13C MR are photosensitive
in the UV range. For example, most ketoacids, such asPA, absorb light
at around 325 nm. DHAc, a metabolite that enters gluconeogenesis at
the level of the trioses, has an absorption spectrum centered at 270
nm. We have shown that the irradiation of DHAc and DMSO with a broadband
UV–vis source leads to the creation of radicals that are stable
at 77 K. These radicals not only may affect the DNP process but also
may represent the unwanted degradation of these molecules. We have
demonstrated that this degradation can be avoided by using a narrowband
light source in the visible spectrum in conjunction with PhGA as the
radical precursor, which has an absorption spectrum that extends above
400 nm. The photochemistry of the radical generation upon photoirradiation
of PhGA and PA at 77 K is shown in Supporting Information Figure 1.A comparison between the efficiency
of the two light sources in photogenerating radicals in PA and PhGA
was made on the basis of the wavelength-dependent power profile of
each light source and the absorption spectrum of the two precursors.
This simple analysis assumes that radical generation is proportional
to the density of photons absorbed by the precursors at each wavelength.
Such a comparison is only qualitative and most likely depends on many
other factors such as light penetration and precursor concentration.
Nevertheless, it reproduces the features observed experimentally,
namely, that while the broadband light source is more effective in
PA radical photogeneration, the difference between the narrowband
and the broadband light sources for PhGA radical photogeneration is
relatively small, especially for samples containing ∼1 M precursor,
which was the concentration used to polarize [2-13C]DHAc.The X-band ESR line width of photoinduced PhGA radicals is 1.4
mT, which is comparable to the line width of the OX063 trityl radical
and much narrower than the photoirradiated PA and TEMPOL line widths
(Supporting Information Figure 4), with
the latter nitroxyl radical having also previously been used to hyperpolarize 13C substrates by dissolution DNP.[21] The four peaks observed in the ESR spectrum of PA (Figure b) are due to coupling of the
unpaired electron in C2 with the methyl group. The PhGA-derived radical
exhibits a narrower line width than the PA-derived radical because
the methyl group is substituted by a phenyl group, thereby increasing
the distance between the unpaired electron localized around the ketone
carbon and the neighboring protons, consequently reducing the hyperfine
coupling. However, the non-negligible g anisotropy of the photoinduced
PhGA radical leads to a larger spread of the ESR absorption line compared
to OX063, especially at the high fields where DNP is performed. Because
narrow ESR line width radicals are generally more efficient for DNP,[25] especially at 3.35 T, PhGA was expected to be
a competitive candidate for hyperpolarized 13C MR experiments
using the HyperSense polarizer. Although the maximum 13C polarization obtained with photoinduction was lower than the one
obtained with OX063, it was larger than what can typically be obtained
with TEMPOL using the Hypersense.[26,27]The
μ-wave spectrum acquired from samples polarized with
photoirradiated PhGA was nearly as narrow as that of the sample doped
with OX063 but was clearly asymmetric because of the g anisotropy
of the PhGA-derived radical. Interestingly, no improvement in 13C polarization or no significant change in the μ-wave
spectrum (Supporting Information Figure 3) could be detected using d5-PhGA, despite
its 10% narrower ESR line width at the X-band as compared to that
of unlabeled PhGA. Again, this is most likely due to the non-negligible
g anisotropy of the PhGA-derived radical, which is exacerbated at
3.35 T as compared to X-band ESR measurements typically performed
at 0.3 T.At 3.35 T, the optimal concentration for the OX063
trityl radical
is 15–21 mM,[15,28] and that of TEMPOL is 30–50
mM.[29] Since the ESR line width of the PhGA-derived
radical is only slightly broader than that of OX063, it was assumed
that a 15–25 mM radical should be photogenerated in the PhGA
samples in order to polarize 13C-enriched substrates using
a HyperSense polarizer. This radical concentration can be achieved
by irradiating 1 M PhGA for 150–200 s with a light source.
Increasing the PhGA concentration in solution increased the photogenerated
radical concentration up to 40 mM.Previous studies showed that
by adding ∼1 mM Gd3+ to a trityl-doped sample 13C polarization could be greatly
improved, possibly because Gd3+ causes a shortening in
the T1 of the DNP-active electron spin
in the low-temperature regime.[26,27] We observed a similar
trend in [2-13C]DHAc samples prepared with the PhGA-derived
radical and doped with Gd3+, with a nearly 2-fold increase
in 13C liquid-state polarization.The radical yield
with photoirradiated PhGA depended on pH. The
highest radical yield was obtained when the solution containing the
precursors was acidic, below the pKa of
PhGA (pKa = 2.3), and it decreased as
the pH was increased. A similar effect has been observed for UV-irradiated
aqueous solutions of PA.[30] Therefore, PhGA
is a radical precursor that is better adapted for acidic formulations
of DNP samples. Conversely, TEMPOL cannot be used to polarize acidic
samples because it spontaneously degrades.PhGA has itself been
shown to be an interesting probe for detecting
hydrogen peroxide using hyperpolarized 13C MR.[18] The proposed method herein could obviously be
used to hyperpolarize 13C-PhGA samples following photoirradiation
with visible light. The presence of a 13C spin on the ketone
carbon will broaden the ESR spectrum through an additional hyperfine
coupling and hence will most likely reduce its efficiency for DNP
at 3.35 T, but as already shown with 13C-PA, this can be
mitigated by increasing the magnetic field of the polarizer and using
μ-wave frequency modulation.[27]
Hyperpolarization of [2-13C]DHAc with a PhGA-Derived
Radical
The highest liquid-state 13C polarization,
measured in a phantom 16 s after dissolution and obtained after having
positively polarized a [2-13C]DHAc sample containing a
photogenerated PhGA radical, was 5%. The estimated liquid-state 13C polarization in the negatively polarized sample that was
injected into the mouse for in vivo application was 8.7% 16 s after
dissolution. This is approximately 2 times lower than the maximum 13C polarization obtained with the OX063 radical. In the framework
of a potential clinical study, part of this difference could be recovered
thanks to the fact that no filtration or quality control for residual
radicals would be required, possibly allowing for a more rapid release
of the dose for injection. In addition, because they can be annihilated
in the solid state,[11] nonpersistent photogenerated
radicals can enable storage and transport, which would certainly benefit
future clinical studies. It is also likely that the 13C
polarization could be improved by performing DNP at higher magnetic
fields and/or lower temperatures as well as by modulating the μ-wave
frequency, as was previously demonstrated with the photoinduced radical
in PA.[12,19,31]An additional
advantage of photogenerated radicals is the longer lifetime of 13C hyperpolarization in the liquid state. The 13C T1 of [2-13C]DHAc measured
at 7 and 14.1 T immediately after dissolution was 15–20% longer
in the solution prepared with PhGA than in the solution containing
0.1 mM OX063. This is a significant but not large change because the
dominant relaxation mechanism at high magnetic fields is due to chemical
shift anisotropy (CSA). However, at lower magnetic fields, such as
in the stray magnetic field experienced by the solution during transfer
between the polarizer and MR system, paramagnetic relaxation dominates,[32] and the difference in T1 between the two types of solutions is expected to be much
greater. Therefore, in a clinical setting where the transfer time
is much longer and the solution might be located in a magnetic field
as low as earth’s magnetic field, quenching the radical will
help to maintain the 13C polarization until the solution
is injected.[33] Removing paramagnetic relaxation
of the hyperpolarized nuclei will also benefit other research fields
that use dissolution DNP as a signal enhancement method, such as low-field
NMR and the study of long-lived singlet states.[34,35]The impurities observed in the hyperpolarized 13C MR
spectra of [2-13C]DHAc were also observed in a thermally
polarized sample that had been neither photoirradiated nor hyperpolarized.
This shows that the molecule of interest stays intact during both
the photoirradiation and the dissolution DNP processes.By analogy
to what has been observed with photoirradiated beads
of frozen PA, the only expected recombination products of the PhGA-derived
radical are CO2 and benzoic acid.[10] Electrospray ionization mass spectrometry analysis showed benzoic
acid as the sole product of PhGA photoirradiation (Supporting Information Figure 5). This is further supported
by the results of Lippert et al., who showed that, when reacted with
hydrogen peroxide, the only product of hyperpolarized [2-13C]PhGA is [1-13C]benzoic acid.[18]
13C MR Measurements of Hyperpolarized [2-13C]DHAc Metabolism in Vivo
PhGA is a moderate acid (pKa = 2.3) with LD50 = 180 mg/kg in
mice[36] and is excreted via urinary elimination.[37] In fact, a pharmacokinetic study where PhGA
was injected intravenously into rats confirmed that PhGA did not metabolize
and that it was excreted via urinary elimination within ∼50
min (apparent first-order rate of elimination of PhGA is ∼0.1025
min–1).[38] The injection
of 400 μL of the hyperpolarized [2-13C]DHAc solution
(50 mM) containing 5 mM PhGA (∼LD50/20) into a 32
g mouse did not affect the monitored physiological parameters. Nevertheless,
daily exposure to large doses of PhGA (above 200 mg/kg) should be
avoided because of potential neurotoxicity due to its amination product,
α-phenlyglycine, which leads to the depletion of striatal dopamine.[39] Less than 100 μM CO2 and benzoic
acid was expected to be present in the solution following recombination
of the PhGA-derived radical. The CO2 most likely escaped
during the dissolution process, and such a low concentration of benzoic
acid is below the doses used therapeutically in humans.[40]Many liver pathologies, such as nonalcoholic
fatty-liver disease, are characterized by an aberrant glucose metabolism.
Hyperpolarized [2-13C]DHAc, which follows gluconeogenesis,
glycolysis, and fatty acid synthesis, has previously been used to
study hepatic metabolism. For example, the metabolic products of hyperpolarized
[2-13C]DHAc in perfused mouse livers reported on differences
between fed and fasted metabolic states.[14] Hepatic metabolic changes after a fructose injection were also detected
in vivo using hyperpolarized [2-13C]DHAc.[16]Here, the main metabolic product of hyperpolarized
[2-13C]DHAc in the liver, glycerol 3-phosphate, was clearly
seen in the 13C MR spectrum as a doublet (75.7 and 71.8
ppm), with glyceraldehyde
3-phosphate in the middle at 73.8 ppm. Smaller peaks were also detected,
which are probably metabolites of the gluconeogenic and glycolytic
pathways, including lactate, glucose, and glycerol, as reported in
a 1H-decoupled spectrum of a perfused liver.[14] Although it has been observed in previous in
vivo studies,[16] the [2-13C]phosphoenolypyruvate
resonance (∼152 ppm) was not observed in this experiment because
it was outside the excitation bandwidth of the pulse used for radio
frequency excitation.The 13C T1 of [2-13C]DHAc in vivo was ∼16 s at 7 T.
This is significantly shorter
than the ∼25 s previously reported in a 3 T MRI scanner,[15] supporting the conclusion derived from our phantom
experiments that CSA is an important relaxation mechanism at high
field. The apparent signal decay time constants of the metabolic products
and DHAc hydrate were similar to that reported for rats in vivo.[16] The DHAc-to-metabolite ratio was ∼70,
which is about 2.5 times higher than that reported in perfused liver.[14] This is consistent with the fact that regions
outside the liver contribute to the DHAc signal, while its metabolites
are mainly produced in the liver. These data show that the method
proposed herein can be used for metabolic studies of the liver in
vivo.
Conclusions
We have described a method to generate
a photoinduced radical for
dissolution DNP in samples containing photosensitive molecules. The
method was used to hyperpolarize [2-13C]DHAc with radical
precursor PhGA using the commercial HyperSense polarizer. The nonpersistent
radical generated by the photoirradiation of PhGA was quenched after
dissolution, increasing the 13C longitudinal relaxation
time. The liquid-state 13C polarization was only half of
the maximum polarization obtained with the OX063 trityl radical but
was nevertheless sufficient to report on the metabolism of gluconeogenic
and glycolytic probe [2-13C]DHAc in vivo. The 13C polarization could be improved by using a higher-field hyperpolarizer
and optimizing the photogenerated radical concentration. Photoirradiated
PhGA could also become an attractive polarizing agent for the remote
production of hyperpolarized 13C molecules since it was
demonstrated that nonpersistent photogenerated radicals can be annihilated
in the solid state.[11]
Authors: Jan H Ardenkjaer-Larsen; Andrew M Leach; Neil Clarke; John Urbahn; Denise Anderson; Timothy W Skloss Journal: NMR Biomed Date: 2011-03-18 Impact factor: 4.044
Authors: Irene Marco-Rius; Cornelius von Morze; Renuka Sriram; Peng Cao; Gene-Yuan Chang; Eugene Milshteyn; Robert A Bok; Michael A Ohliger; David Pearce; John Kurhanewicz; Peder E Z Larson; Daniel B Vigneron; Matthew Merritt Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2016-11-17 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Irene Marco-Rius; Peng Cao; Cornelius von Morze; Matthew Merritt; Karlos X Moreno; Gene-Yuan Chang; Michael A Ohliger; David Pearce; John Kurhanewicz; Peder E Z Larson; Daniel B Vigneron Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2016-03-28 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Karlos X Moreno; Santhosh Satapati; Ralph J DeBerardinis; Shawn C Burgess; Craig R Malloy; Matthew E Merritt Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2014-10-28 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Andrea Capozzi; Saket Patel; Christine Pepke Gunnarsson; Irene Marco-Rius; Arnaud Comment; Magnus Karlsson; Mathilde H Lerche; Olivier Ouari; Jan Henrik Ardenkjaer-Larsen Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2018-12-20 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: Adam P Gaunt; Jennifer S Lewis; Friederike Hesse; Tian Cheng; Irene Marco-Rius; Kevin M Brindle; Arnaud Comment Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2021-11-25 Impact factor: 16.823
Authors: Danila A Barskiy; Michael C D Tayler; Irene Marco-Rius; John Kurhanewicz; Daniel B Vigneron; Sevil Cikrikci; Ayca Aydogdu; Moritz Reh; Andrey N Pravdivtsev; Jan-Bernd Hövener; John W Blanchard; Teng Wu; Dmitry Budker; Alexander Pines Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2019-07-05 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Irene Marco-Rius; Alan J Wright; De-En Hu; Dragana Savic; Jack J Miller; Kerstin N Timm; Damian Tyler; Kevin M Brindle; Arnaud Comment Journal: MAGMA Date: 2020-09-10 Impact factor: 2.310
Authors: Claudia C Zanella; Andrea Capozzi; Hikari A I Yoshihara; Alice Radaelli; Adèle L C Mackowiak; Lionel P Arn; Rolf Gruetter; Jessica A M Bastiaansen Journal: NMR Biomed Date: 2021-07-10 Impact factor: 4.044