Flóra John1,2, Edit Bosnyák1,2, Natasha L Robinette3,4,5, Alit J Amit-Yousif3,4,5, Geoffrey R Barger6,5, Keval D Shah6, Sharon K Michelhaugh7, Neil V Klinger, Sandeep Mittal7,3,8,5, Csaba Juhász1,6,7,2,5. 1. Department of Pediatrics, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan. 2. PET Center and Translational Imaging Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Michigan, Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, Michigan. 3. Department of Oncology, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan. 4. Department of Radiology, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan. 5. Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, Michigan. 6. Department of Neurology, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan. 7. Department of Neurosurgery, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan. 8. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although glioblastomas are heterogeneous brain-infiltrating tumors, their treatment is mostly focused on the contrast-enhancing tumor mass. In this study, we combined conventional MRI, diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and amino acid PET to explore imaging-defined glioblastoma subregions and evaluate their potential prognostic value. METHODS: Contrast-enhanced T1, T2/fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) MR images, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps from DWI, and alpha-[11C]-methyl-L-tryptophan (AMT)-PET images were analyzed in 30 patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Five tumor subregions were identified based on a combination of MRI contrast enhancement, T2/FLAIR signal abnormalities, and AMT uptake on PET. ADC and AMT uptake tumor/contralateral normal cortex (T/N) ratios in these tumor subregions were correlated, and their prognostic value was determined. RESULTS: A total of 115 MRI/PET-defined subregions were analyzed. Most tumors showed not only a high-AMT uptake (T/N ratio > 1.65, N = 27) but also a low-uptake subregion (N = 21) within the contrast-enhancing tumor mass. High AMT uptake extending beyond contrast enhancement was also common (N = 25) and was associated with low ADC (r = -0.40, P = 0.05). Higher AMT uptake in the contrast-enhancing tumor subregions was strongly prognostic for overall survival (hazard ratio: 7.83; 95% CI: 1.98-31.02, P = 0.003), independent of clinical and molecular genetic prognostic variables. Nonresected high-AMT uptake subregions predicted the sites of tumor progression on posttreatment PET performed in 10 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Glioblastomas show heterogeneous amino acid uptake with high-uptake regions often extending into non-enhancing brain with high cellularity; nonresection of these predict the site of posttreatment progression. High tryptophan uptake values in MRI contrast-enhancing tumor subregions are a strong, independent imaging marker for longer overall survival.
BACKGROUND: Although glioblastomas are heterogeneous brain-infiltrating tumors, their treatment is mostly focused on the contrast-enhancing tumor mass. In this study, we combined conventional MRI, diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and amino acid PET to explore imaging-defined glioblastoma subregions and evaluate their potential prognostic value. METHODS: Contrast-enhanced T1, T2/fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) MR images, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps from DWI, and alpha-[11C]-methyl-L-tryptophan (AMT)-PET images were analyzed in 30 patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Five tumor subregions were identified based on a combination of MRI contrast enhancement, T2/FLAIR signal abnormalities, and AMT uptake on PET. ADC and AMT uptake tumor/contralateral normal cortex (T/N) ratios in these tumor subregions were correlated, and their prognostic value was determined. RESULTS: A total of 115 MRI/PET-defined subregions were analyzed. Most tumors showed not only a high-AMT uptake (T/N ratio > 1.65, N = 27) but also a low-uptake subregion (N = 21) within the contrast-enhancing tumor mass. High AMT uptake extending beyond contrast enhancement was also common (N = 25) and was associated with low ADC (r = -0.40, P = 0.05). Higher AMT uptake in the contrast-enhancing tumor subregions was strongly prognostic for overall survival (hazard ratio: 7.83; 95% CI: 1.98-31.02, P = 0.003), independent of clinical and molecular genetic prognostic variables. Nonresected high-AMT uptake subregions predicted the sites of tumor progression on posttreatment PET performed in 10 patients. CONCLUSIONS:Glioblastomas show heterogeneous amino acid uptake with high-uptake regions often extending into non-enhancing brain with high cellularity; nonresection of these predict the site of posttreatment progression. High tryptophan uptake values in MRI contrast-enhancing tumor subregions are a strong, independent imaging marker for longer overall survival.
Authors: David O Kamson; Csaba Juhász; Amy Buth; William J Kupsky; Geoffrey R Barger; Pulak K Chakraborty; Otto Muzik; Sandeep Mittal Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2013-01-09 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Ramon F Barajas; Joanna J Phillips; Rupa Parvataneni; Annette Molinaro; Emma Essock-Burns; Gabriela Bourne; Andrew T Parsa; Manish K Aghi; Michael W McDermott; Mitchel S Berger; Soonmee Cha; Susan M Chang; Sarah J Nelson Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2012-06-18 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Frederic G Dhermain; Peter Hau; Heinrich Lanfermann; Andreas H Jacobs; Martin J van den Bent Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2010-08-10 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: Christiane A Opitz; Ulrike M Litzenburger; Felix Sahm; Martina Ott; Isabel Tritschler; Saskia Trump; Theresa Schumacher; Leonie Jestaedt; Dieter Schrenk; Michael Weller; Manfred Jugold; Gilles J Guillemin; Christine L Miller; Christian Lutz; Bernhard Radlwimmer; Irina Lehmann; Andreas von Deimling; Wolfgang Wick; Michael Platten Journal: Nature Date: 2011-10-05 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Christian Ewelt; Frank W Floeth; Jörg Felsberg; Hans J Steiger; Michael Sabel; Karl-Josef Langen; Gabriele Stoffels; Walter Stummer Journal: Clin Neurol Neurosurg Date: 2011-04-20 Impact factor: 1.876
Authors: Egesta Lopci; Marco Riva; Laura Olivari; Fabio Raneri; Riccardo Soffietti; Arnoldo Piccardo; Alberto Bizzi; Pierina Navarria; Anna Maria Ascolese; Roberta Rudà; Bethania Fernandes; Federico Pessina; Marco Grimaldi; Matteo Simonelli; Marco Rossi; Tommaso Alfieri; Paolo Andrea Zucali; Marta Scorsetti; Lorenzo Bello; Arturo Chiti Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2017-01-21 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Roger Stupp; Monika E Hegi; Warren P Mason; Martin J van den Bent; Martin J B Taphoorn; Robert C Janzer; Samuel K Ludwin; Anouk Allgeier; Barbara Fisher; Karl Belanger; Peter Hau; Alba A Brandes; Johanna Gijtenbeek; Christine Marosi; Charles J Vecht; Karima Mokhtari; Pieter Wesseling; Salvador Villa; Elizabeth Eisenhauer; Thierry Gorlia; Michael Weller; Denis Lacombe; J Gregory Cairncross; René-Olivier Mirimanoff Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2009-03-09 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Antoine Girard; Pierre-Jean Le Reste; Alice Metais; Beatrice Carsin Nicol; Dan Cristian Chiforeanu; Elise Bannier; Boris Campillo-Gimenez; Anne Devillers; Xavier Palard-Novello; Florence Le Jeune Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2021-10-22 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Silvia Valtorta; Daniela Salvatore; Paolo Rainone; Sara Belloli; Gloria Bertoli; Rosa Maria Moresco Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2020-08-06 Impact factor: 5.923