| Literature DB >> 30345312 |
Naveen T Krishnareddy1, Jestin V Thomas2, Saritha S Nair3, Johannah N Mulakal3, Balu P Maliakel3, I M Krishnakumar3.
Abstract
Considering the recent interest in free (unconjugated) curcuminoids delivery, the present study investigated the efficacy of a novel food-grade free-curcuminoids delivery system (curcumin-galactomannoside complex; CGM) in improving the hepatic function markers (inflammation and oxidative stress) in chronic alcoholics. The double-blinded, placebo-controlled study randomized 48 subjects with elevated serum transaminases and gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) levels, who were allocated to two groups (n=24) and to receive either placebo or CGM at (250 mg × 2)/day for 8 weeks. While liver function markers (transaminases and GGT) in the placebo group showed an increase (~ 9.5%), CGM group indicated a significant decrease in transaminases (31%) and GGT (29%) from the baseline levels. The beneficial effect of CGM was also clear from the significant increase (p <0.001) in endogenous antioxidants (GSH, SOD, and GPx) and decrease in inflammatory markers (IL-6 and CRP) levels (p <0.001) as compared to both the baseline and placebo group. To summarize, the nutritional intervention of CGM-curcumin was found to offer a significant hepatoprotective effect to attenuate the alcohol induced alterations to hepatic function markers. The Indian Medical Council and Drug Controller General of India approved Clinical Trial Registry No. CTRI/2018/03/012385.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30345312 PMCID: PMC6174784 DOI: 10.1155/2018/9159281
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Comparison of baseline and anthropometric characteristics between CGM and placebo groups.
|
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 45± 9.1 | |||
|
| Male | |||
|
| 165.7± 6.2 | |||
|
| 73.45±6.1 | 73.2±8.9 | 72.2±7.1 | 70.12±5.2 |
|
| 31.2±3.6 | 30.10±5.0 | 30.8±3.5 | 29.88±4.5 |
|
| 124.41±3.2 | 126±3.4 | 121.3±3.4 | 124.7±3.3 |
|
| 83.3±6.4 | 86.23±5.1 | 82.52±4.8 | 84.54±2.7 |
|
| 13.2±1.16 | 13.4±0.88 | 13.5±1.19 | 13.0±0.70 |
|
| 1.18±0.2 | 1.1±0.2 | 1.1±0.2 | 1.09±1.8 |
|
| 245.2±30.2 | 243.8±30.3 | 234.3±20.1 | 258.2±32.7 |
|
| 45.21±4.2 | 42.55±5.5 | 53.21±4.3 | 40.21±4.1 |
|
| 109.2±21.5 | 112.7±17.5 | 100.4±15.1 | 120.7±18.1 |
|
| 199.5±49.5 | 189±28.6 | 176.2±42.7 | 191.3±34.2 |
SBP: systolic blood pressure.
DBP: diastolic blood pressure.
BMI: body mass index.
Hb: haemoglobin.
HDL: high density lipoprotein.
LDL: low density lipoprotein.
Inclusion and exclusion criteria for the study.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Healthy subjects with chronic alcohol consumption | Subjects abstaining from alcohol for more than 1 month, concomitant symptomatic or asymptomatic bacterial infection and severe bacterial infection within the previous 3 months |
| Elevated liver function markers- | Subjects diagnosed with any diseases, and those with renal disorder, hepatitis (ALT level ≥ 3 times the upper limit), and gall bladder diseases or its removal, cardiovascular, pulmonary, kidney disease, pancreatitis, type I diabetes. |
| No evidence of liver diseases- | Subjects who are currently under any medications or herbal supplements. |
Figure 1CONSORT flow diagram of the study.
Figure 2HPLC and HPTLC analysis of CGM in comparison with standard curcumin.
Figure 3Liver toxicity markers in serum; significant difference in p values given as ∗∗ = p < 0.01; ∗∗∗ = p < 0.001, and ns = p > 0.05, when the CGM group is compared with that of placebo.
Figure 4Oxidative stress markers in serum; significant difference in p values given as ∗∗ = p < 0.01; ∗∗∗ = p < 0.001, and ns = p > 0.05, when the CGM group is compared with that of placebo.
Figure 5Inflammatory marker in serum; significant difference in p values given as ∗∗ = p < 0.01; ∗∗∗ = p < 0.001, and ns = p > 0.05, when the CGM group is compared with that of placebo.