| Literature DB >> 30344488 |
Takamasa Yokoi1, Hirohisa Watanabe1,2, Hiroshi Yamaguchi2, Epifanio Bagarinao2, Michihito Masuda1, Kazunori Imai1, Aya Ogura1, Reiko Ohdake2, Kazuya Kawabata1, Kazuhiro Hara1, Yuichi Riku1, Shinsuke Ishigaki1, Masahisa Katsuno1, Shinichi Miyao3, Katsuhiko Kato4, Shinji Naganawa5, Ryuichi Harada6, Nobuyuki Okamura7, Kazuhiko Yanai6, Mari Yoshida8, Gen Sobue1,2.
Abstract
Background: Imaging studies in Alzheimer's disease (AD) have yet to answer the underlying questions concerning the relationship among tau retention, neuroinflammation, network disruption and cognitive decline. We compared the spatial retention patterns of 18F-THK5351 and resting state network (RSN) disruption in patients with early AD and healthy controls.Entities:
Keywords: 11C-PiB; 18F-THK5351; MAO-B; MRI; astrocyte; positron emission tomography (PET); resting state network
Year: 2018 PMID: 30344488 PMCID: PMC6182068 DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2018.00304
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Aging Neurosci ISSN: 1663-4365 Impact factor: 5.750
Patients’ characteristics.
| Healthy control (HC) | Early AD | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Number | 24 | 23 | N.A. |
| Age at examination | 65.4 ± 7.3 | 68.6 ± 7.8 | N.S.a |
| Male:Female | 8:16 | 4:19 | N.S.b |
| Education | 14.1 ± 2.0 | 13.4 ± 1.9 | N.S.a |
| Age at onset | NA | 66.1 ± 7.9 | N.A. |
| Disease duration (year) | NA | 2.5 ± 1.4 | N.A. |
| CDR | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.67 ± 0.24 | <0.001a |
| CDR-SB | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 2.9 ± 1.2 | <0.001a |
| MMSE | 29.4 ± 1.0 | 23.6 ± 2.8 | <0.001a |
| ADAS-cog-j | 3.0 ± 1.4 | 12.6 ± 5.3 | <0.001a |
| Logical memory II | 21.1 ± 6.7 | 1.0 ± 1.7 | <0.001a |
| ACE-R | 97.9 ± 2.4 | 75.1 ± 9.0 | <0.001a |
| Aβ global SUVR | 1.18 ± 0.08 | 1.93 ± 0.25 | <0.001a |
Data are shown as mean ± standard deviation (SD). . MMSE, mini mental state examination; CDR, clinical dementia rating; CDR-SB, Clinical Dementia Rating Scale Sum of Boxes; ADS-cog-j, Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive-Japanese; ACE-R, Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination-Revised; Aβ, amyloid β; SUVR, Standard uptake value ratio; AD, Alzheimer’s disease; N.S., not significant; N.A., not applicable.
Figure 1Decreased gray matter volume in early Alzheimer’s disease (AD). The hot spots indicate sites where gray matter’s volume significantly decreased in AD (family-wise error cluster level correction (FWEc) at p < 0.05).
Figure 2Spatial distributions of THK5351 covariation pattern using scaled subprofile modeling/principal component analysis (SSM/PCA). AD-related THK5351 distribution pattern (ADRTP; A): SSM/PCA identified a principal component 1 (PC1), which indicates AD-related THK5351 covariation pattern (ADRTP). The hot areas represent PC1. Common distribution pattern of THK5351 between healthy control (HC) and AD (B): SSM/PCA identified PC2, which indicates that the accumulation sites common to early AD patients and HC. The hot areas represent PC2.
Figure 3PC1 and subject score, ADRTP. Panel (A) shows ADRTP. This figure indicates the ratio of each PC with the total subject voxel variance of data. Panel (B) shows subject score relative to PC1 which showed 82.6% sensitivity and 79.1% specificity in discriminating AD from HC. Panel (C) shows the relationship between the Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination Revised (ACE-R) and the ADRTP subject scores of early AD patients, Clinical Dementia Rating 1.0 (CDR 1.0) and CDR 0.5. Blue triangles indicate CDR0.5, and green circles indicate CDR1.0. Panel (D) represents the relationship between ACE-R and the ADRTP subject scores of early AD patients, CDR1.0. Green circles indicate CDR1.0.
Location of AD-related THK5351 distribution pattern (PC1).
| Area | Number of voxels | Side | BA | Location of peak within area | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Middle frontal gyrus | 186 | Left | BA9 | −32 | 30 | 38 |
| Superior frontal gyrus | 123 | Left | BA8 | −34 | 24 | 44 |
| Middle frontal gyrus | 363 | Right | BA9 | 34 | 26 | 38 |
| Superior frontal gyrus | 334 | Right | BA8 | 34 | 16 | 48 |
| Medial frontal gyrus | 249 | Right | BA10 | 28 | 44 | 26 |
| Inferior frontal gyrus | 229 | Right | BA6 | 32 | 12 | 48 |
| Inferior parietal lobule | 1227 | Bilateral | BA40 | 48 | −54 | 38 |
| Precuneus | 1162 | Bilateral | BA7 | 4 | −58 | 30 |
| Inferior temporal gyrus | 834 | Bilateral | BA20 | 56 | −30 | −20 |
| Inferior temporal gyrus | 795 | Bilateral | BA21 | 58 | −26 | −16 |
| Middle temporal gyrus | 760 | Bilateral | BA39 | 46 | −62 | 28 |
| Precuneus | 716 | Bilateral | BA7 | 4 | −54 | 30 |
| Fusiform gyrus | 354 | Bilateral | BA37 | 54 | −40 | −20 |
| Precuneus | 236 | Bilateral | BA19 | 34 | −68 | 38 |
| Superior temporal gyrus | 195 | Bilateral | BA22 | 50 | −60 | 14 |
BA, Brodman area.
Figure 4Relationship between THK5351 retention and canonical resting state networks (RSNs). Panel (A) shows the similarity of the THK5351 retention pattern and each canonical RSN. Panel (B) is the result of independent component analysis (ICA). The green areas indicate each canonical network, and the blue areas indicate decreased connectivity, as identified by ICA of resting-state functional MRI data (FWE at p < 0.05).
Figure 5Seed-based connectivity of the precuneus/posterior cingulate cortex (PCC) and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). This figure shows seed-based connectivity analysis from ROIs located in the precuneus/PCC (A–C), and DLPFC (D–F). (A,D) HC (B,E) early AD; (C) intrinsic connectivity of precuneus/PCC significantly decreased to the hot areas (FWEc p < 0.05, cluster defining threshold, p = 0.001, cluster size = 170). (F) Intrinsic connectivity of DLPFC significantly decreased to the hot areas (FWEc p < 0.05, cluster defining threshold, p = 0.001, cluster size = 220).
Seed based connectivity analysis.
| Cluster | BA | Side | MNI coordinates | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PFWE-corr | K(E) | p-uncorrected | ||||||
| Middle occipital gyrus | 0.002 | 322 | 0.000 | 19 | L | −28 | −96 | 20 |
| Superior temporal gyrus | 0.018 | 214 | 0.001 | 38 | L | 38 | −24 | 22 |
| Amygdala | 0.035 | 183 | 0.002 | L | −24 | −2 | −22 | |
| Fusiform gyrus | 0.047 | 170 | 0.003 | 2 | R | −38 | 18 | −24 |
| Superior parietal lobule | 21 | 220 | 0.001 | 7 | L | −38 | −44 | 34 |
FWE, Family wised error; K(E), minimum cluster extent; BA, Broadman area.
Figure 6Comparative study among THK5351, tau, monoamine oxidase-B (MAO-B) and astrogliosis findings of the precuneus/posterior cingulate gyrus (PCC) and parahippocampal gyrus in autopsy cases with AD. Panel (A) shows the results of 3H-THK5351 autoradiography. In vitro autoradiogram of 3H-THK5351 in brain sections of the parahippocampal gyrus and precuneus/PCC from an 81-year-old control (Braak II) and an 87-year-old AD patient (Braak V) in the absence and presence of the MAO-B inhibitor lazabemide. 3H-THK5351 bindings in the parahippocampal gyrus and precuneus/PCC was more evident in a patient with Braak’s stage V (Case 1) than in a healthy control with Braak’s stage II (Control 1). After treatment with lazabemide (+lazabemide) as a MAO-B inhibitor, 3H-THK5351 bindings remained detectable in the parahippocampus and precuneus/PCC in Case 1 with Braak’s stage V but was scarce in Control 1 with Braak’s stage II. Panel (B) demonstrates the results of immunostaining of tau, MAO-B, and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP). Anti-tau antibody (AT8), anti-MAO-B antibody and GFAP immunohistochemistry revealed marked immunostaining in an AD case, compared to a healthy control. Tau, MAO-B and GFAP accumulation were more evident in Braak’s stage V than in Braak’s stage II patients. Panel (C) is the result of double immunofluorescence for GFAP and MAO-B. Tissue sections double stained with anti-MAO-B antibody and anti-GFAP antibody in a Braak’s stage V parahippocampal gyrus, and the PCC/precuneus. GFAP and MAO-B were colocalized in the astrocyte. Anti-GFAP immunohistochemistry diffusely labeled the cytoplasm and processed of astrocytes, which contained MAO-B immunopositive granules.