| Literature DB >> 30344300 |
Marina Aunapuu1,2, Piret Kibur3, Tõnu Järveots4, Andres Arend5.
Abstract
Objective: To investigate morphological changes in the endometrial epithelial cells of patients with infertility problems. Materials and methods: Endometrial biopsies were obtained from 10 women who have undergone several unsuccessful in vitro fertilisation (IVF) procedures. Endometrial biopsies were performed between luteinizing hormone surge days LH+6 to +10 of the natural menstrual cycle. Each sample was divided into three parts, which were processed for histological, transmission (TEM), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) investigations.Entities:
Keywords: ciliated cells; endometrium; infertility; pinopodes; secretory cells
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30344300 PMCID: PMC6262557 DOI: 10.3390/medicina54050069
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Medicina (Kaunas) ISSN: 1010-660X Impact factor: 2.430
Patients’ characteristics.
| Patient No. | Age (Years) | Previous IVF Failure | LH+ | Phase Lag | Estradiol (pmol/L) | Progesterone (nmol/L) | Testosterone (nmol/L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 29 | 1 | 6 | + | 756 | 53.7 | 1.45 |
| 2 | 36 | 1 | 6 | − | 727 | ≤0.64 | ≤0.49 |
| 3 | 38 | 1 | 7 | − | 474 | 25.8 | 2.8 |
| 4 | 32 | 1 | 8 | + | 822 | 66.5 | 1.96 |
| 5 | 31 | 2 | 9 | − | 602 | 33.4 | 1.78 |
| 6 | 30 | 1 | 10 | − | 437 | 30.2 | 2.58 |
| 7 | 40 | 1 | 10 | − | 536 | 38.2 | 0.87 |
| 8 | 28 | 1 | 10 | + | 492 | 17.8 | 2.28 |
| 9 | 38 | 2 | 10 | + | 709 | 49.3 | 0.91 |
| 10 | 34 | 2 | 6 | + | 148 | 3.21 | 1.35 |
IVF—in vitro fertilization, LH+—days after luteinizing hormone surge, phase lag +—phase lag determined, phase lag −—no phase lag determined.
Results of sonographical and morphological investigations.
| Patient No. | Endom. Thickness (mm) | Gland-to-Stroma Ratio | Spiral Arteries | SEM Investigations | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ciliated Cells (%) | Secretory Cells (%) | Pinopodes/Type | ||||
| 1 | 9.8 | 1:2 | − | 47.1 | 52.9 | 0 |
| 2 | 6.9 | 1:2 | + | 49.4 | 50.6 | 14F/10R |
| 3 | 16.4 | 2:1 | + | 12.9 | 87.1 | 18/F |
| 4 | 12.8 | 1:1 | + | 28.1 | 71.9 | 24/F |
| 5 | 11.5 | 1:1 | + | 8.0 | 92.0 | 14/R |
| 6 | 7.9 | 2:1 | + | 30.7 | 69.3 | 8/F |
| 7 | 8.3 | 1:1 | + | 19.3 | 80.7 | 0 |
| 8 | 10.4 | 1:1 | − | 24.8 | 75.2 | 0 |
| 9 | 11 | 1:2 | − | 23.1 | 76.9 | 0 |
| 10 | 11.6 | 1:2 | − | 19.0 | 81.0 | 0 |
Endom. Thickness—endometrial thickness; + presence of spiral arteries in the endometrium; − spiral arteries were not found in the endometrium; F—fully developed pinopodes; R—regressing pinopodes.
Figure 1Histology: (A) Regular simple columnar epithelium of the endometrium of patient no. 1 (arrow); H&E. (B) Impaired endometrial epithelium (arrow) found in patient no. 3; H&E. (C) Endometrium with equal (1:1) gland–stroma ratio of patient no. 4; H&E. (D) Endometrium with prevailing connective tissue stroma (2:1) in patient no. 6; H&E.
Figure 2Ultrastructure of ciliated cell with regular cilia (patient no. 5); TEM 17000×.
Figure 3SEM: (A) “Bare” endometrial cells with few cilia and microvilli (patient no. 1). (B) Regressing small pinopodes with wrinkled surface (arrow, patient no. 2). (C) “Bare” endometrial cells with few cilia (arrows, patient no. 5). (D) Normal endometrial secretory epithelial cells (patient no. 8). (E) Normal endometrial secretory epithelial cells (arrow, patient no. 9). (F) Epithelial cells with short microvilli on the apical surface (patient no. 10).