Literature DB >> 15533340

Histological dating of timed endometrial biopsy tissue is not related to fertility status.

Christos Coutifaris1, Evan R Myers, David S Guzick, Michael P Diamond, Sandra A Carson, Richard S Legro, Peter G McGovern, William D Schlaff, Bruce R Carr, Michael P Steinkampf, Susan Silva, Donna L Vogel, Phyllis C Leppert.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the ability of histological dating to discriminate between women of fertile and infertile couples. The utility of histological dating of endometrium in the evaluation of infertile couples is uncertain.
DESIGN: Prospective multicenter study, with subjects randomly assigned to biopsy timing. Criterion standard for infertility was 12 months of unprotected, regular intercourse without conception and for fertility at least one live birth within 2 years.
SETTING: University-based infertility practices. PATIENT(S): Volunteer subjects (847) recruited at 12 clinical sites participating in the National Institutes of Health-funded Reproductive Medicine Network. Inclusion criteria included ages 20-39 years, regular menstrual cycles, and no hormonal treatment or contraceptive use for 1 month before the study. Fertile controls were excluded if they had a history of infertility, recurrent pregnancy loss, or recent breastfeeding. INTERVENTION(S): Subjects underwent daily urinary LH testing. After detection of the LH surge, subjects were randomized to biopsy in the mid (days 21-22) or the late (days 26-27) luteal phase. Pathologists at each site estimated the cycle day based on standard criteria. For the primary analysis, an out-of-phase biopsy was defined as a greater than 2-day delay in the histological maturation of the endometrium. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The proportion of out-of-phase biopsies in fertile and infertile women was compared using logistic regression models with age at randomization as a covariate. Comparisons were also made between fertile vs. infertile at the midluteal or late luteal phase time points. RESULT(S): Biopsies were evaluated (301 mid and 318 late; N = 619). Out-of-phase biopsy results poorly discriminated between women from fertile and infertile couples in either the midluteal (fertile: 49.4%, infertile: 43.2%) or late luteal phase (fertile: 35.3%, infertile 23.0%). Results did not substantially differ using alternative definitions of "out-of-phase" or standardized cycle day. CONCLUSION(S): Histological dating of the endometrium does not discriminate between women of fertile and infertile couples and should not be used in the routine evaluation of infertility.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15533340     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.03.069

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  52 in total

Review 1.  Implantation failure: molecular mechanisms and clinical treatment.

Authors:  Hakan Cakmak; Hugh S Taylor
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2010-08-21       Impact factor: 15.610

Review 2.  Inflammation in reproductive disorders.

Authors:  Gerson Weiss; Laura T Goldsmith; Robert N Taylor; Dominique Bellet; Hugh S Taylor
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.060

Review 3.  Guidelines for the design, analysis and interpretation of 'omics' data: focus on human endometrium.

Authors:  Signe Altmäe; Francisco J Esteban; Anneli Stavreus-Evers; Carlos Simón; Linda Giudice; Bruce A Lessey; Jose A Horcajadas; Nick S Macklon; Thomas D'Hooghe; Cristina Campoy; Bart C Fauser; Lois A Salamonsen; Andres Salumets
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2013-09-29       Impact factor: 15.610

4.  Endometrial Dating Method Detects Individual Maturation Sequences During the Secretory Phase.

Authors:  Joachim Alfer; Amir Fattahi; Nathalie Bleisinger; JÜrgen Krieg; Rolf Behrens; Ralf Dittrich; Matthias W Beckmann; Arndt Hartmann; Irmgard Classen-Linke; Roxana M Popovici
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2020 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.155

5.  Nuclear pore complex proteins mark the implantation window in human endometrium.

Authors:  Elisa Guffanti; Nupur Kittur; Z Nilly Brodt; Alex J Polotsky; Satu M Kuokkanen; Debra S Heller; Steven L Young; Nanette Santoro; U Thomas Meier
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2008-05-27       Impact factor: 5.285

6.  Prospective evaluation of luteal phase length and natural fertility.

Authors:  Natalie M Crawford; David A Pritchard; Amy H Herring; Anne Z Steiner
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  Evolutionary forward genomics reveals novel insights into the genes and pathways dysregulated in recurrent early pregnancy loss.

Authors:  Gülüm Kosova; Mary D Stephenson; Vincent J Lynch; Carole Ober
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2015-01-12       Impact factor: 6.918

8.  Effects of variations in serum estradiol concentrations on secretory endometrial development and function in experimentally induced cycles in normal women.

Authors:  Jeremy M Groll; Rebecca S Usadi; Bruce A Lessey; Ruth Lininger; Steven L Young; Marc A Fritz
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 7.329

9.  Apoptosis is increased and cell proliferation is decreased in out-of-phase endometria from infertile and recurrent abortion patients.

Authors:  Gabriela F Meresman; Carla Olivares; Susana Vighi; Margarita Alfie; Marcela Irigoyen; Juan J Etchepareborda
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2010-10-22       Impact factor: 5.211

10.  Proteomic analysis of the luteal endometrial secretome.

Authors:  Jessica G Scotchie; Marc A Fritz; Mihaela Mocanu; Bruce A Lessey; Steven L Young
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2009-06-03       Impact factor: 3.060

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.