Jan Goedeke1, Alexandra Ertl2, Daniela Zöller3, Stephan Rohleder2, Oliver J Muensterer2. 1. Department of Pediatric Surgery, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany. Electronic address: jan.goedeke@unimedizin-mainz.de. 2. Department of Pediatric Surgery, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany. 3. Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics (IMBEI), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany; Institute for Medical Biometry and Statistics, Albert-Ludwigs-University Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:Telemedicine is gaining popularity for a variety of indications. We performed a randomized controlled trial comparing telemedical versus conventional clinic follow-up in terms of feasibility and quality. METHODS:Patients discharged from pediatric surgery were randomized to telemedical or onsite follow-up. In the telemedical group, video telephony was used to obtain interim history and physical findings. Onsite patients were personally seen in the outpatient clinic. Caregivers completed a postvisit survey on satisfaction and efficiency. Providers scored data transmission quality and clinical interpretability. RESULTS:From March 2015 until January 2017, 224 patients were randomized equally to the study groups. Telemedicine was highly accepted by caregivers, and data transmission quality was sufficient for comprehensive follow-up. No important clinical findings were missed. Quality of interaction scored higher in the telemedical versus the onsite group (77.8% vs. 48%, p < 0.001) as did caregiver satisfaction (5.4 vs. 5.1, p < 0.03). Travel investment, time required, loss of earnings, and days off from work/school were all significantly lower in the telemedical group (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Telemedical posthospitalization follow-up in pediatric surgery provides a cost-effective, time-saving alternative for patients and caregivers that is well received and accepted. The quality of clinical data transmission is sufficient to provide safe care and uncompromised clinical judgment. TYPE OF STUDY: Prospective and randomized controlled study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 1b.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Telemedicine is gaining popularity for a variety of indications. We performed a randomized controlled trial comparing telemedical versus conventional clinic follow-up in terms of feasibility and quality. METHODS:Patients discharged from pediatric surgery were randomized to telemedical or onsite follow-up. In the telemedical group, video telephony was used to obtain interim history and physical findings. Onsite patients were personally seen in the outpatient clinic. Caregivers completed a postvisit survey on satisfaction and efficiency. Providers scored data transmission quality and clinical interpretability. RESULTS: From March 2015 until January 2017, 224 patients were randomized equally to the study groups. Telemedicine was highly accepted by caregivers, and data transmission quality was sufficient for comprehensive follow-up. No important clinical findings were missed. Quality of interaction scored higher in the telemedical versus the onsite group (77.8% vs. 48%, p < 0.001) as did caregiver satisfaction (5.4 vs. 5.1, p < 0.03). Travel investment, time required, loss of earnings, and days off from work/school were all significantly lower in the telemedical group (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Telemedical posthospitalization follow-up in pediatric surgery provides a cost-effective, time-saving alternative for patients and caregivers that is well received and accepted. The quality of clinical data transmission is sufficient to provide safe care and uncompromised clinical judgment. TYPE OF STUDY: Prospective and randomized controlled study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 1b.
Authors: Jose Diaz-Miron; Sarah Ogle; Alex Kaizer; Shannon N Acker; Kyle O Rove; Thomas H Inge Journal: Pediatr Surg Int Date: 2021-09-22 Impact factor: 1.827
Authors: Debra T Choi; Yvonne H Sada; Shubhada Sansgiry; David E Kaplan; Tamar H Taddei; Jason K Aguilar; Michael Strayhorn; Ruben Hernaez; Jessica A Davila Journal: J Gastrointest Cancer Date: 2022-06-30
Authors: Rose-Marie Lindkvist; Annica Sjöström-Strand; Kajsa Landgren; Björn A Johnsson; Pernilla Stenström; Inger Kristensson Hallström Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-06-15 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Diana Heimes; Philipp Luhrenberg; Nils Langguth; Sebahat Kaya; Christine Obst; Peer W Kämmerer Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-03-15 Impact factor: 3.390