Madhusudhan R Sanaka1, Prashanthi N Thota2, Malav P Parikh2, Umar Hayat3, Niyati M Gupta2, Scott Gabbard2, Rocio Lopez4, Sudish Murthy5, Siva Raja5. 1. Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA. sanakam@ccf.org. 2. Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA. 3. Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA. 4. Department of Quantitative Health Science and Bio-statistics, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA. 5. Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) may be associated with higher rates of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) than laparoscopic Heller's myotomy with fundoplication (LHM), since POEM is not combined with a fundoplication. However, peri-esophageal anti-reflux barriers are preserved in POEM, which might prevent GERD. Hence, we sought to compare the objective esophageal pH study findings in achalasia patients after POEM and LHM. METHODS: Achalasia patients undergoing POEM from 2014 to 2015 at our institution were matched 1:3 with LHM patients using propensity score matching. Demographics, prior interventions, pre-treatment and 2-month post-treatment timed barium esophagram (TBE), high-resolution esophageal manometry (HREM) and 24-h esophageal pH study findings were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients in the POEM group and 88 patients in the LHM group were included. Larger proportion of POEM patients had prior interventions for achalasia as compared to LHM patients (overall: 71% vs. 44.3%; p = 0.012). Esophageal acid exposure was significantly higher in POEM as compared to LHM patients (abnormal total acid exposure: 48.4% vs. 13.6%; p < 0.001, abnormal DeMeester score 54.8% vs. 17.4%; p = 0.005 respectively). In sub-group analysis, similar results were noted on 24-h pH study after exclusion of the POEM patients with prior LHM and corresponding matches. There was no significant difference in the rate of GERD symptoms between POEM and LHM. There was no significant correlation between the post-treatment basal lower esophageal sphincter pressure and integrated relaxation pressure with abnormal acid exposure in either POEM or LHM. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with achalasia, POEM leads to significantly higher rates of abnormal esophageal acid exposure, without an increase in the rate of GERD symptoms, when compared to LHM with fundoplication. Interestingly, prior LHM has no impact on post-POEM pH study findings. Potential of increased esophageal acid exposure and possible consequences should be discussed with all patients prior to POEM. Further studies are needed to determine the long-term effects of increased acid exposure after POEM.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) may be associated with higher rates of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) than laparoscopic Heller's myotomy with fundoplication (LHM), since POEM is not combined with a fundoplication. However, peri-esophageal anti-reflux barriers are preserved in POEM, which might prevent GERD. Hence, we sought to compare the objective esophageal pH study findings in achalasiapatients after POEM and LHM. METHODS:Achalasiapatients undergoing POEM from 2014 to 2015 at our institution were matched 1:3 with LHM patients using propensity score matching. Demographics, prior interventions, pre-treatment and 2-month post-treatment timed barium esophagram (TBE), high-resolution esophageal manometry (HREM) and 24-h esophageal pH study findings were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients in the POEM group and 88 patients in the LHM group were included. Larger proportion of POEM patients had prior interventions for achalasia as compared to LHM patients (overall: 71% vs. 44.3%; p = 0.012). Esophageal acid exposure was significantly higher in POEM as compared to LHM patients (abnormal total acid exposure: 48.4% vs. 13.6%; p < 0.001, abnormal DeMeester score 54.8% vs. 17.4%; p = 0.005 respectively). In sub-group analysis, similar results were noted on 24-h pH study after exclusion of the POEM patients with prior LHM and corresponding matches. There was no significant difference in the rate of GERD symptoms between POEM and LHM. There was no significant correlation between the post-treatment basal lower esophageal sphincter pressure and integrated relaxation pressure with abnormal acid exposure in either POEM or LHM. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with achalasia, POEM leads to significantly higher rates of abnormal esophageal acid exposure, without an increase in the rate of GERD symptoms, when compared to LHM with fundoplication. Interestingly, prior LHM has no impact on post-POEM pH study findings. Potential of increased esophageal acid exposure and possible consequences should be discussed with all patients prior to POEM. Further studies are needed to determine the long-term effects of increased acid exposure after POEM.
Authors: Pietro Familiari; Giovanni Gigante; Michele Marchese; Ivo Boskoski; Andrea Tringali; Vincenzo Perri; Guido Costamagna Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2016-01 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: H Inoue; H Minami; Y Kobayashi; Y Sato; M Kaga; M Suzuki; H Satodate; N Odaka; H Itoh; S Kudo Journal: Endoscopy Date: 2010-03-30 Impact factor: 10.093
Authors: Daniel von Renteln; Haruhiro Inoue; Hiromi Minami; Yuki Birgit Werner; Andrea Pace; Jan Felix Kersten; Chressen Catharina Much; Guido Schachschal; Oliver Mann; Jutta Keller; Karl-Hermann Fuchs; Thomas Rösch Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2011-11-08 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: Edward L Jones; Michael P Meara; Jennifer S Schwartz; Jeffrey W Hazey; Kyle A Perry Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2015-06-27 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: P J Kahrilas; A J Bredenoord; M Fox; C P Gyawali; S Roman; A J P M Smout; J E Pandolfino Journal: Neurogastroenterol Motil Date: 2014-12-03 Impact factor: 3.598
Authors: Neil H Bhayani; Ashwin A Kurian; Christy M Dunst; Ahmed M Sharata; Erwin Rieder; Lee L Swanstrom Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2014-06 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Mikhail Attaar; Bailey Su; Harry J Wong; Kristine Kuchta; Woody Denham; Stephen P Haggerty; John Linn; Michael B Ujiki Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2020-08-13 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Jun Liang Teh; Hui Yu Tham; Alex Yu Sen Soh; Corrisa Chee; Guowei Kim; Asim Shabbir; Reuben Kong Min Wong; Jimmy Bok Yan So Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2021-07-29 Impact factor: 4.584