Literature DB >> 30341527

Effect of Paired Associative Stimulation on Motor Cortex Excitability in Rats.

Xiang-Yu Zhang1,2, Yan-Fang Sui1,3, Tie-Cheng Guo4, Sai-Hua Wang1,5, Yan Hu1,6, Yin-Shan Lu1.   

Abstract

Paired associative stimulation (PAS), combining transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) with electrical peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) in pairs with an optimal interstimulus interval (ISI) in between, has been shown to influence the excitability of the motor cortex (MC) in humans. However, the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. This study was designed to explore an optimal protocol of PAS, which can modulate the excitability of MC in rats, and to investigate the underlying mechanisms. The resting motor thresholds (RMTs) of TMS-elicited motor evoked potentials (MEPs) recorded from the gastrocnemius muscle and the latency of P1 component of somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) induced by electrical tibial nerve stimulation were determined in male Sprague-Dawley rats (n=10). Sixty rats were then randomly divided into 3 groups: a PAS group (further divided into 10 subgroups at various ISIs calculated by using the latency of P1, n=5, respectively), a TMS (only) group (n=5) and a PNS (only) group (n=5). Ninety repetitions of PAS, TMS and PNS were administered to the rats in the 3 groups, respectively, at the frequency of 0.05 Hz and the intensity of TMS at 120% RMT and that of PNS at 6 mA. RMTs and motor evoked potentials' amplitude (MEPamp) were recorded before and immediately after the interventions. It was found that the MEPamp significantly decreased after PAS at ISI of 5 ms (P<0.05), while the MEPamp significantly increased after PAS at ISI of 15 ms, as compared with those before the intervention (P<0.05). However, the RMT did not change significantly after PAS at ISI of 5 ms or 15 ms (P>0.05). PAS at other ISIs as well as the sole use of TMS and PNS induced no remarkable changes in MEPamp and RMT. In conclusion, PAS can influence motor cortex excitability in rats. Neither TMS alone nor PNS alone shows significant effect.

Entities:  

Keywords:  electrical stimulation; motor evoked potentials; paired associative stimulation; peripheral nerves; resting motor thresholds; somatosensory evoked potentials; transcranial magnetic stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30341527     DOI: 10.1007/s11596-018-1960-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Med Sci        ISSN: 2523-899X


  46 in total

1.  Modulation of associative human motor cortical plasticity by attention.

Authors:  Katja Stefan; Matthias Wycislo; Joseph Classen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-01-14       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Modulation of corticospinal excitability by paired associative stimulation: reproducibility of effects and intraindividual reliability.

Authors:  Fabiana Fratello; Domenica Veniero; Giuseppe Curcio; Michele Ferrara; Cristina Marzano; Fabio Moroni; Maria Concetta Pellicciari; Mario Bertini; Paolo Maria Rossini; Luigi De Gennaro
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-10-02       Impact factor: 3.708

3.  Characterization of graded multicenter animal spinal cord injury study contusion spinal cord injury using somatosensory-evoked potentials.

Authors:  Gracee Agrawal; Candace Kerr; Nitish V Thakor; Angelo H All
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2010-05-15       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Mechanisms of motor-evoked potential facilitation following prolonged dual peripheral and central stimulation in humans.

Authors:  M C Ridding; J L Taylor
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2001-12-01       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Targeting unlesioned pharyngeal motor cortex improves swallowing in healthy individuals and after dysphagic stroke.

Authors:  Emilia Michou; Satish Mistry; Samantha Jefferson; Salil Singh; John Rothwell; Shaheen Hamdy
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 22.682

6.  The effects of paired associative stimulation on knee extensor motor excitability of individuals post-stroke: a pilot study.

Authors:  Lynn M Rogers; David A Brown; James W Stinear
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 3.708

7.  Homeostatic modulation of stimulation-dependent plasticity in human motor cortex.

Authors:  N V Ilić; S Milanović; J Krstić; D D Bajec; M Grajić; T V Ilić
Journal:  Physiol Res       Date:  2011-07-19       Impact factor: 1.881

8.  A temporally asymmetric Hebbian rule governing plasticity in the human motor cortex.

Authors:  Alexander Wolters; Friedhelm Sandbrink; Antje Schlottmann; Erwin Kunesch; Katja Stefan; Leonardo G Cohen; Reiner Benecke; Joseph Classen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-01-22       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Effects of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Astrocytes Proliferation and nNOS Expression in Neuropathic Pain Rats.

Authors:  Lu Yang; Sai-Hua Wang; Yan Hu; Yan-Fang Sui; Tao Peng; Tie-Cheng Guo
Journal:  Curr Med Sci       Date:  2018-06-22

10.  Tibial somatosensory evoked potential can prognosticate for ambulatory function in subacute hemiplegic stroke.

Authors:  Pyoungsik Hwang; Min Kyun Sohn; Cuk-Seong Kim; Sungju Jee
Journal:  J Clin Neurosci       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 1.961

View more
  5 in total

1.  Assessment of Corticospinal Excitability in Awake Rodents Using EMG-Controlled Intracortical Stimulation.

Authors:  Windsor K C Ting; Derek Burns; Maxime Huot-Lavoie; Christian Ethier
Journal:  Bio Protoc       Date:  2021-12-20

2.  Effects of Paired Associative Stimulation on Metabolites in Ischemia Stroke Rats Model as Studied by Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectrum.

Authors:  Yan Hu; Jinfeng Wu; Xiangyu Zhang; Jun Tian; Yinshan Lu; Tiecheng Guo
Journal:  Neurochem Res       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 3.996

3.  Paired associative stimulation improves synaptic plasticity and functional outcomes after cerebral ischemia.

Authors:  Yan Hu; Tie-Cheng Guo; Xiang-Yu Zhang; Jun Tian; Yin-Shan Lu
Journal:  Neural Regen Res       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 5.135

4.  Paired Associative Stimulation Fails to Induce Plasticity in Freely Behaving Intact Rats.

Authors:  Windsor Kwan-Chun Ting; Maxime Huot-Lavoie; Christian Ethier
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2020-04-01

5.  Anesthesia inhibited corticospinal excitability and attenuated the modulation of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Xin Wang; Tengfei Wang; Jingna Jin; He Wang; Ying Li; Zhipeng Liu; Tao Yin
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2022-04-19       Impact factor: 2.376

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.