Literature DB >> 21777019

Homeostatic modulation of stimulation-dependent plasticity in human motor cortex.

N V Ilić1, S Milanović, J Krstić, D D Bajec, M Grajić, T V Ilić.   

Abstract

Since recently, it is possible, using noninvasive cortical stimulation, such as the protocol of paired associative stimulation (PAS), to induce the plastic changes in the motor cortex, in humans that mimic Hebb's model of learning. Application of TMS conjugated with peripheral electrical stimulation at strictly coherent temporal manner lead to convergence of inputs in the sensory-motor cortex, with the consequent synaptic potentiation or weakening, if applied repetitively. However, when optimal interstimulus interval (ISI) for induction of LTP-like effects is applied as a single pair, Motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude inhibition is observed, the paradigm known as short-latency afferent inhibition (SLAI). Aiming to resolve this paradox, PAS protocols were applied, with 200 repetitions of TMS pulses paired with median nerve electrical stimulation, at ISI equal to individual latencies of evoked response of somatosensory cortex (N(20)) (PAS(LTP)), and at ISI of N(20) shortened for 5 msec (PAS(LTD)) - protocols that mimic LTP-like changes in the human motor cortex. MEP amplitudes before, during and after interventions were measured as an indicator based on output signals originating from the motor system. Post-intervention MEP amplitudes following the TMS protocols of PAS(LTP) and PAS(LTD) were facilitated and depressed, respectively, contrary to MEP amplitudes during intervention. During PAS(LTP) MEP amplitudes were significantly decreased in case of PAS(LTP), while in the case of PAS(LTD) an upward trend was observed. In conclusions, a possible explanation for the seemingly paradoxical effect of PAS can be found in the mechanism of homeostatic modulation of plasticity. Those findings indicate the existence of complex relationships in the development of plasticity induced by stimulation, depending on the level of the previous motor cortex excitability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21777019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Res        ISSN: 0862-8408            Impact factor:   1.881


  7 in total

1.  Serial treatments of primed low-frequency rTMS in stroke: characteristics of responders vs. nonresponders.

Authors:  James R Carey; Huiqiong Deng; Bernadette T Gillick; Jessica M Cassidy; David C Anderson; Lei Zhang; William Thomas
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.406

2.  Low Doses of Ethanol Enhance LTD-like Plasticity in Human Motor Cortex.

Authors:  Anna Fuhl; Florian Müller-Dahlhaus; Caroline Lücke; Stefan W Toennes; Ulf Ziemann
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 7.853

3.  Effect of Paired Associative Stimulation on Motor Cortex Excitability in Rats.

Authors:  Xiang-Yu Zhang; Yan-Fang Sui; Tie-Cheng Guo; Sai-Hua Wang; Yan Hu; Yin-Shan Lu
Journal:  Curr Med Sci       Date:  2018-10-20

4.  Induction of cortical plasticity for reciprocal muscles by paired associative stimulation.

Authors:  Makoto Suzuki; Hikari Kirimoto; Kazuhiro Sugawara; Makoto Watanabe; Shinobu Shimizu; Ikuyo Ishizaka; Sumio Yamada; Atsuhiko Matsunaga; Michinari Fukuda; Hideaki Onishi
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 2.708

5.  Inducing LTD-Like Effect in the Human Motor Cortex with Low Frequency and Very Short Duration Paired Associative Stimulation: An Exploratory Study.

Authors:  Prachaya Srivanitchapoom; Jung E Park; Nivethida Thirugnanasambandam; Pattamon Panyakaew; Vesper Fe Marie Ramos; Sanjay Pandey; Tianxia Wu; Mark Hallett
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 3.599

Review 6.  Modulation of human corticospinal excitability by paired associative stimulation.

Authors:  Richard G Carson; Niamh C Kennedy
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  A Systematic Review of Paired Associative Stimulation (PAS) to Modulate Lower Limb Corticomotor Excitability: Implications for Stimulation Parameter Selection and Experimental Design.

Authors:  Gemma Alder; Nada Signal; Sharon Olsen; Denise Taylor
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 4.677

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.