Zoe F Cairncross1, Jeremy Herring2, Trevor van Ingen2, Brendan T Smith2, Pamela Leece2, Brian Schwartz2, Karin Hohenadel2. 1. Dalla Lana School of Public Health (Cairncross, Smith, Leece, Schwartz), University of Toronto; Public Health Ontario (Cairncross, Herring, van Ingen, Smith, Leece, Schwartz, Hohenadel), Toronto, Ont. zoe.cairncross@mail.utoronto.ca. 2. Dalla Lana School of Public Health (Cairncross, Smith, Leece, Schwartz), University of Toronto; Public Health Ontario (Cairncross, Herring, van Ingen, Smith, Leece, Schwartz, Hohenadel), Toronto, Ont.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Negative health outcomes associated with the use of both prescribed and nonprescribed opioids are increasingly prevalent. We examined long-term trends in opioid-related harms in Ontario across a set of 6 indicators and the relation between harms and neighbourhood income in 2016. METHODS: We examined rates of neonatal abstinence syndrome, opioid poisoning (fatal and nonfatal) and nonpoisoning opioid-related events from 2003 to 2016 in Ontario using population-based health administrative databases. We conducted descriptive analyses for harm indicators across neighbourhood income quintiles in 2016 (2015 for death). We examined social inequalities in opioid-related harms on both relative (prevalence ratio) and absolute (potential rate reduction) scales. RESULTS: Rates of opioid-related harms increased dramatically between 2003 and 2016. In 2016, neonatal abstinence syndrome and opioid poisoning and nonpoisoning events showed a strong social gradient, with harm rates being lowest in higher-income neighbourhoods and highest in lower-income neighbourhoods. Prevalence ratios for the lowest-income neighbourhoods compared to the highest-income neighbourhoods ranged from 2.36 (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.15-2.58) for emergency department visits for opioid poisoning to 3.70 (95% CI 2.62-5.23) for neonatal abstinence syndrome. Potential rate reductions for opioid-related harms ranged from 34.8% (95% CI 29.1-40.1) to 49.9% (95% CI 36.7-60.5), which suggests that at least one-third of all harmful events could be prevented if all neighbourhoods had the same socioeconomic profile as the highest-income neighbourhoods. INTERPRETATION: Rates of opioid-related harms increased in Ontario between 2003 and 2016, and people in lower-income neighbourhoods experienced substantially higher rates of opioid-related harms than those in higher-income neighbourhoods. This finding can inform planning for opioid-related public health interventions with consideration of health equity. Copyright 2018, Joule Inc. or its licensors.
BACKGROUND: Negative health outcomes associated with the use of both prescribed and nonprescribed opioids are increasingly prevalent. We examined long-term trends in opioid-related harms in Ontario across a set of 6 indicators and the relation between harms and neighbourhood income in 2016. METHODS: We examined rates of neonatal abstinence syndrome, opioid poisoning (fatal and nonfatal) and nonpoisoning opioid-related events from 2003 to 2016 in Ontario using population-based health administrative databases. We conducted descriptive analyses for harm indicators across neighbourhood income quintiles in 2016 (2015 for death). We examined social inequalities in opioid-related harms on both relative (prevalence ratio) and absolute (potential rate reduction) scales. RESULTS: Rates of opioid-related harms increased dramatically between 2003 and 2016. In 2016, neonatal abstinence syndrome and opioid poisoning and nonpoisoning events showed a strong social gradient, with harm rates being lowest in higher-income neighbourhoods and highest in lower-income neighbourhoods. Prevalence ratios for the lowest-income neighbourhoods compared to the highest-income neighbourhoods ranged from 2.36 (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.15-2.58) for emergency department visits for opioid poisoning to 3.70 (95% CI 2.62-5.23) for neonatal abstinence syndrome. Potential rate reductions for opioid-related harms ranged from 34.8% (95% CI 29.1-40.1) to 49.9% (95% CI 36.7-60.5), which suggests that at least one-third of all harmful events could be prevented if all neighbourhoods had the same socioeconomic profile as the highest-income neighbourhoods. INTERPRETATION: Rates of opioid-related harms increased in Ontario between 2003 and 2016, and people in lower-income neighbourhoods experienced substantially higher rates of opioid-related harms than those in higher-income neighbourhoods. This finding can inform planning for opioid-related public health interventions with consideration of health equity. Copyright 2018, Joule Inc. or its licensors.
Authors: Richard A Epstein; William V Bobo; Peter R Martin; James A Morrow; Wei Wang; Rameela Chandrasekhar; William O Cooper Journal: Ann Epidemiol Date: 2013-08 Impact factor: 3.797
Authors: Maria Zlotorzynska; M-J S Milloy; Lindsey Richardson; Paul Nguyen; Julio S Montaner; Evan Wood; Thomas Kerr Journal: Int J Drug Policy Date: 2014-04-04
Authors: Charles R Bauer; John C Langer; Seetha Shankaran; Henrietta S Bada; Barry Lester; Linda L Wright; Heidi Krause-Steinrauf; Vincent L Smeriglio; Loretta P Finnegan; Penelope L Maza; Joel Verter Journal: Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med Date: 2005-09
Authors: Stephen W Patrick; Robert E Schumacher; Brian D Benneyworth; Elizabeth E Krans; Jennifer M McAllister; Matthew M Davis Journal: JAMA Date: 2012-04-30 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Abby L Cheng; Brian K Brady; Ethan C Bradley; Ryan P Calfee; Lisa M Klesges; Graham A Colditz; Heidi Prather Journal: PM R Date: 2021-05-03 Impact factor: 2.298
Authors: Lucas K Vitzthum; Vinit Nalawade; Paul Riviere; Whitney Sumner; Tyler Nelson; Loren K Mell; Timothy Furnish; Brent Rose; María Elena Martínez; James D Murphy Journal: JCO Oncol Pract Date: 2021-02-03
Authors: Matthew D Eisenberg; Alexander McCourt; Elizabeth A Stuart; Lainie Rutkow; Kayla N Tormohlen; Michael I Fingerhood; Luis Quintero; Sarah A White; Emma Elizabeth McGinty Journal: PLoS One Date: 2021-12-16 Impact factor: 3.240