Literature DB >> 30336352

Platform-independent models for age prediction using DNA methylation data.

Sae Rom Hong1, Kyoung-Jin Shin1, Sang-Eun Jung2, Eun Hee Lee2, Hwan Young Lee3.   

Abstract

Age prediction has been in the spotlight recently because it can provide an important information about the contributors of biological evidence left at crime scenes. Specifically, many researchers have actively suggested age-prediction models using DNA methylation at several CpG sites and tested the candidates using platforms such as the HumanMethylation 450 array and pyrosequencing. With DNA methylation data obtained from each platform, age prediction models were constructed using diverse statistical methods typically with multivariate linear regression. However, because each developed model is based on single-platform data, the prediction accuracy is reduced when applying DNA methylation data obtained from other platforms. In this study, bisulfite sequencing data for 95 saliva samples were generated using massively parallel sequencing (MPS) and compared with methylation SNaPshot data from the same 95 individuals. The predicted age obtained by applying MPS data to an age-prediction model built for methylation SNaPshot data differed greatly from the chronological age due to platform differences. Therefore, novel variables were introduced to indicate the platform type, and construct platform-independent age predictive models using a neural network and multivariate linear regression. The final neural network model had a mean absolute deviation (MAD) of 3.19 years between the predicted and chronological age, and the mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) was 8.89% in the test set. Similarly, the linear regression model showed 3.69 years of MAD and 10.44% of MAPE in the same test set. The platform-independent age-prediction model was made extensible to an increasing number of platforms by introducing platform variables, and the idea of platform variables can be applied to age prediction models for other body fluids.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Age prediction; DNA methylation; MPS; Methylation SNaPshot; Neural network

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30336352     DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2018.10.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Genet        ISSN: 1872-4973            Impact factor:   4.882


  5 in total

Review 1.  Patterns of DNA methylation as an indicator of biological aging: State of the science and future directions in precision health promotion.

Authors:  Shannon L Gillespie; Lynda R Hardy; Cindy M Anderson
Journal:  Nurs Outlook       Date:  2019-05-17       Impact factor: 3.250

Review 2.  Application of magnetic nanoparticles in nucleic acid detection.

Authors:  Congli Tang; Ziyu He; Hongmei Liu; Yuyue Xu; Hao Huang; Gaojian Yang; Ziqi Xiao; Song Li; Hongna Liu; Yan Deng; Zhu Chen; Hui Chen; Nongyue He
Journal:  J Nanobiotechnology       Date:  2020-04-21       Impact factor: 10.435

3.  Detecting Prognosis Risk Biomarkers for Colon Cancer Through Multi-Omics-Based Prognostic Analysis and Target Regulation Simulation Modeling.

Authors:  Zuojing Yin; Xinmiao Yan; Qiming Wang; Zeliang Deng; Kailin Tang; Zhiwei Cao; Tianyi Qiu
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 4.599

4.  MapReduce-Based Parallel Genetic Algorithm for CpG-Site Selection in Age Prediction.

Authors:  Zahra Momeni; Mohammad Saniee Abadeh
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-25       Impact factor: 4.096

5.  DNA Methylation Biomarkers-Based Human Age Prediction Using Machine Learning.

Authors:  Atef Zaguia; Deepak Pandey; Sandeep Painuly; Saurabh Kumar Pal; Vivek Kumar Garg; Neelam Goel
Journal:  Comput Intell Neurosci       Date:  2022-01-24
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.