Literature DB >> 30334912

In Their Own Words: Caregiver and Patient Perspectives on Stressors, Resources, and Recommendations in Craniofacial Microsomia Care.

Alexis L Johns1, Daniela V Luquetti2,3,4, Michelle R Brajcich5, Carrie L Heike2,3,4, Nicola M Stock6.   

Abstract

This study describes stressors, resources, and recommendations related to craniofacial microsomia (CFM) care from the perspective of caregivers of children with CFM and adults with CFM to inform improved quality of healthcare delivery. A mixed method design was used with fixed-response and open-ended questions from an online survey in English. The survey included demographics, CFM phenotypic information, and items about CFM-related experiences across settings. Themes were identified by qualitative analysis of responses to open-ended questions. Respondents (n = 51) included caregivers (n = 42; 90% mothers) and adults with CFM (n = 9; 78% female), who had a mean age of 45 ± 6 years. Most children were male (71%) with an average age of 7 ± 4 years. Respondents were primarily white (80%), non-Hispanic (89%), from the United States (82%), had a college degree (80%), and had private health insurance (80%). Reflecting the high rate of microtia (84%) in the sample, themes centered on the impact of hearing difficulties across settings with related language concerns. Negative social experiences were frequently described and school needs outlined. Multiple medical stressors were identified and corresponding suggestions included: providers need to be better informed about CFM, treatment coordination among specialists, and preference for a family-centered approach with reassurance, empathy, and clear communication. Advice offered to others with CFM included positive coping strategies. Overall, caregivers' and patients' responses reflected the complexity of CFM treatment. Incorporating these perspectives into routine CFM care has the potential to reduce family distress while improving their healthcare.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30334912      PMCID: PMC6224304          DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000004867

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniofac Surg        ISSN: 1049-2275            Impact factor:   1.046


  30 in total

1.  Evaluation of the effectiveness of Face IT, a computer-based psychosocial intervention for disfigurement-related distress.

Authors:  A Bessell; V Brough; A Clarke; D Harcourt; T P Moss; N Rumsey
Journal:  Psychol Health Med       Date:  2012-02-07       Impact factor: 2.423

2.  Stress in Parents of a Child with Hemifacial Microsomia: The Role of Child Characteristics and Parental Coping Strategies.

Authors:  Edwin Ongkosuwito; Lieneke van der Vlies; Vivian Kraaij; Nadia Garnefski; Han van Neck; Anne Marie Kuijpers-Jagtman; Steven Hovius
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2018-02-26

3.  Qualitative approaches in craniofacial research.

Authors:  Pauline A Nelson
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2008-10-27

Review 4.  Oculo-auriculo-vertebral spectrum: a review of the literature and genetic update.

Authors:  Ana Beleza-Meireles; Jill Clayton-Smith; Jorge M Saraiva; May Tassabehji
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 6.318

5.  Healthcare and psychosocial experiences of individuals with craniofacial microsomia: Patient and caregivers perspectives.

Authors:  Daniela V Luquetti; Michelle R Brajcich; Nicola M Stock; Carrie L Heike; Alexis L Johns
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 1.675

6.  Taking charge of communication: adults' descriptions of growing up with a cleft-related speech impairment.

Authors:  Christina Havstam; Katja Laakso; Anette Lohmander; Karin C Ringsberg
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2010-12-23

7.  The Eurocleft study: intercenter study of treatment outcome in patients with complete cleft lip and palate. Part 4: relationship among treatment outcome, patient/parent satisfaction, and the burden of care.

Authors:  Gunvor Semb; Viveca Brattström; Kirsten Mølsted; Birte Prahl-Andersen; Petra Zuurbier; Nichola Rumsey; William C Shaw
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2005-01

Review 8.  Characterization of facial paresis in hemifacial microsomia.

Authors:  Jay M Cline; Katherine E Hicks; Krishna G Patel
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2013-11-18       Impact factor: 3.497

9.  Psychosocial interventions for adults with visible differences: a systematic review.

Authors:  Alyson Norman; Timothy P Moss
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 2.984

10.  Developing young person's Face IT: Online psychosocial support for adolescents struggling with conditions or injuries affecting their appearance.

Authors:  Heidi Williamson; Catrin Griffiths; Diana Harcourt
Journal:  Health Psychol Open       Date:  2015-12-09
View more
  3 in total

1.  Parental Reports of Intervention Services and Prevalence of Teasing in a Multinational Craniofacial Microsomia Pediatric Study.

Authors:  Alexis L Johns; Daniela V Luquetti; Carrie L Heike; Amelia F Drake; Milagros M Dueñas Roque; Paula Hurtado-Villa; Harry Pachajoa; Gloria Liliana Porras-Hurtado; Ignacio Zarante; Leanne Magee
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2021 Nov-Dec 01       Impact factor: 1.172

2.  Community participation in youth with craniofacial microsomia.

Authors:  Vera C Kaelin; Erin R Wallace; Martha M Werler; Brent R Collett; Mary A Khetani
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 3.033

3.  Caregiver Perspectives on School Participation Among Students With Craniofacial Microsomia.

Authors:  Vera C Kaelin; Erin R Wallace; Martha M Werler; Brent R Collett; Janine Rosenberg; Mary A Khetani
Journal:  Am J Occup Ther       Date:  2021 Mar-Apr
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.