Literature DB >> 30333866

Never-in-mitosis A-related kinase 8, a novel target of von-Hippel-Lindau tumor suppressor protein, promotes gastric cancer cell proliferation.

Xiao-Fei Ding1,2, Jie Chen2, Jun Zhou2,3, Guang Chen3,4, Ying-Liang Wu1.   

Abstract

Previous research has revealed that the von-Hippel-Lindau tumor suppressor protein (pVHL) may downregulate never-in-mitosis A-related kinase 8 (NEK8) via hypoxia-inducible factor-α (HIF-α). The HIF-independent functions of pVHL also serve an important role in its tumor-suppressor action. In the present study, the association between pVHL and NEK8 was demonstrated in the human gastric cancer cell line, SGC-7901, indicating a direct interaction of pVHL with NEK8. Subsequently, it was reported that MG-132, a specific proteasome inhibitor, may attenuate pVHL overexpression-induced reductions in NEK8 protein expression levels. In addition, the present study revealed that pVHL may stimulate the rapid degradation of NEK8 protein and promote its ubiquitination. The association between the expression profile of NEK8 and the survival status of patients with gastric cancer was analyzed from an online database. Kaplan-Meier survival plots indicated that higher expression levels of NEK8 may lead to poor survival, as suggested by the transcriptomic data of 1,065 patients with gastric cancer. It was found that NEK8-knockdown mediated by RNA interference inhibited SGC-7901 and SNU-1 proliferation, colony formation and migration in vitro, and tumor growth in vivo. Collectively, the present study proposed that NEK8 may be a novel target of pVHL as a ubiquitin E3 ligase, and may serve a role as a potential oncoprotein in human gastric cancer.

Entities:  

Keywords:  gastric cancer; never-in-mitosis A-related kinase 8; tumor progression; ubiquitin; von-Hippel-Lindau tumor suppressor

Year:  2018        PMID: 30333866      PMCID: PMC6176424          DOI: 10.3892/ol.2018.9328

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncol Lett        ISSN: 1792-1074            Impact factor:   2.967


Introduction

Gastric cancer (GC) is the fourth most common cause of cancer-associated mortality worldwide, as the majority of patients initially present at an advanced stage of the disease; the prognosis is poor with a 6-month survival rate of <15% (1). Since GC is a heterogeneous disease with various genetic mutations, in addition to current histological classification systems, including Lauren (2) and the World Health Organization (3) systems, it has been of great focus to determine a novel molecular classification system in the age of high-throughput technology. As reviewed by Cisło et al (4), The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) sought to identify the subtypes of GC using complex statistical analyses of molecular data that had been obtained from six molecular analysis platforms that included DNA sequencing, RNA sequencing and protein arrays. A total of four major genomic subtypes of GC were proposed, including Epstein Barr Virus-positive, microsatellite instability, genomically stable and chromosomal instability. In the present study, never-in-mitosis A-related kinase 8 (NEK8) gene expression data and relapse-free and overall survival information were further analyzed from Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo; Affymetrix microarrays only; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) and the European Genome-Phenome Archive (EGA; http://www.ebi.ac.uk/ega/home), in addition to TCGA, using online tool (http://kmplot.com/analysis/) (5). It was revealed that higher expression levels of NEK8 lead to poor survival outcomes associated with GC, indicating that NEK8 may be associated with the development of GC. NEK8 is a member of the serine/threonine protein kinase family associated with never in mitosis, gene A (NIMA) of Aspergillus nidulans (6–8), and it has been reported to serve a role in the progression of the cell cycle from the G2 to M phase (9), primary cilia disassembly (10,11) and activation of the DNA damage response signaling pathway (9,12). Holland et al (13) identified NEK8 as a novel NIMA-associated kinase and also its candidate target BICD cargo adaptor 2, which has been associated with microtubule dynamics, independent of the cell cycle. In addition, it has been reported in several studies that NEK8 regulates ciliary stability via polycystin-1, polycystin-2 (11), yes-associated protein (14), galectin-1, sorcin and vimentin proteins (15). It has previously been reported that NEK8 may serve a potential role in tumorigenesis and the DNA damage response via MYC proto-oncogene, BHLH transcription factor (16), RAD51 recombinase (17) and the serine/threonine kinase signaling pathway (12). However, the underlying mechanism of NEK8 regulation requires further investigation (18). In another previous study (19), it was revealed that NEK8 may be a novel target gene for hypoxia-inducible factors (HIFs) and that the von-Hippel-Lindau tumor suppressor protein (pVHL) may downregulate NEK8 expression via HIFs. It has been well reported that the functions of pVHL, the product of the VHL tumor suppressor gene, may be associated with its role as the substrate-recognition component of an E3 ubiquitin ligase complex, which also contains elongin B, elongin C, cullin 2 and ring-box 1 (20). The aforementioned complex targets HIF-α for ubiquitination and degradation. Although less thoroughly characterized, pVHL also exhibits HIF-independent functions, including regulation of microtubule dynamics, extracellular matrix deposition, responses to DNA damage and primary cilia maintenance (20). In the present study, it was demonstrated that pVHL may interact with NEK8 and act as an E3 ubiquitin ligase that promotes NEK8 degradation. The results of the present study may improve current knowledge of NEK8 function and regulation.

Materials and methods

Cell culture and reagents

SGC-7901 and SNU-1 cells were obtained from the Type Culture Collection of the Chinese Academy of Science (CASTCC; Shanghai, China) and cultured in an appropriate medium, RPMI-1640 plus 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), as suggested by CASTCC. Cells were incubated at 37°C with 5% CO2. Cycloheximide (CHX) and MG-132 were obtained from MedChemExpress (Shanghai, China).

Plasmid transfection

The plasmids (2 µg) pcDNA3.0-VHL, enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP)-NEK8 and influenza hemagglutinin-tagged ubiquitin (HA-Ub) were transfected using Lipofectamine 2000® (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) according to the manufacturer's protocol. At 48 h post-transfection, the cells were treated or harvested and subjected to further analyses.

NEK8-knockdown

Stable knockdown of NEK8 in SGC-7901 cells was conducted with the pSUPER RNAi system using Lipofectamine 2000® (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.), according to the manufacturer's protocols. To establish pSUPER-NEK8, the sequences selected from human NEK8 cDNA, 5′-TCGTCAAGATCGGTGATTT-3′ and 5′-CTGGAAGACAAAGCCCTTA-3′, were synthesized by Sangon Biotech Co., Ltd (Shanghai, China). NEK8-shRNA sequence was inserted in pSUPER vector and empty pSUPER vector was used as the negative control.

Ubiquitination assays

SGC-7901 cells were co-transfected with EGFP-NEK8, HA-Ub and VHL or vector plasmids, respectively. Cells were treated with 10 µM MG-132 for 4 h prior to harvesting. GFP-NEK8 protein was immunoprecipitated from cell lysates using anti-GFP antibody (2 µg; cat. no. sc-101525), and IgG antibody (2 µg; cat. no. sc-2025; both Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc., Dallas, TX, USA) was used as the control. Proteins from the precipitates were subjected to western blotting with anti-HA antibody (1:1,000; cat. no. sc-7392; Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc.).

NEK8 half-life assays

The SGC-7901 cells at 48 h after transfection with pcDNA3.0-VHL were exposed to 100 µg/ml cycloheximide for 10, 30 and 60 min to block protein synthesis. The cells were collected for immunoblotting analyses. Changes in relative protein expression levels over time were determined by measuring the optical density of the NEK8 protein bands.

Immunoblotting and immunoprecipitation

Immunoblotting and immunoprecipitation were conducted as previously described (17), using antibodies against NEK8 (1:500; cat. no. sc-50761), HA (1:1,000; cat. no. sc-7392), GFP (1:1,000; cat. no. sc-101525), GAPDH (1:5,000; cat. no. sc-47724; all Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc.) and VHL (1:500; cat. no. 68547; Cell Signaling Technology Inc., Danvers, MA, USA). In brief, 50 ng protein samples was extracted using RIPA lysis and lysed in sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) buffer, separated by 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE), and transferred to PVDF membranes. The membranes were incubated with primary antibodies at 4°C overnight, followed by peroxidase-labeled secondary antibodies (1:2,000; cat. nos. sc-2005 and sc-2030; Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc.) at room temperature for 1 h. Immunoblots were developed using the ECL Prime Western Blotting Detection system (GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Little Chalfont, UK). For immunoprecipitation, 1 µg primary antibody against VHL was added to 200 µl lysates of 2×106 cells and incubated with rotation at 4°C for 2 h. Rabbit immunoglobulin G (IgG) was used as a negative control. Subsequent to precipitation with agarose A/G (Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc.), proteins were washed in 100 µl SDS loading buffer (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology, Haimen, China); 20 µl of each sample was separated by 12% SDS-PAGE and analyzed by immunoblotting using an antibody against NEK8.

Kaplan-Meier survival analysis

The Kaplan-Meier plotter is capable of assessing the effect of 54,675 genes on survival using 10,461 cancer samples, including 5,143 patients with breast cancer, 1,816 with ovarian cancer, 2,437 with lung cancer and 1,065 with GC, with a mean follow-up of 69, 40, 49 and 33 months, respectively. The primary purpose of the tool was a meta-analysis-based biomarker assessment. Gene expression data and relapse-free and overall survival information were downloaded from GEO (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo; Affymetrix microarrays only; Affymetrix; Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.), EGA (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/ega/home) and TCGA (https://cancergenome.nih.gov). The database was handled by a PostgreSQL server (https://www.postgresql.org), which integrates gene expression and clinical data simultaneously. To analyze the prognostic value of a particular gene, the patient samples were split into two groups, according to varying quantile expression of the proposed biomarker. A Kaplan-Meier survival plot was used to compare the two patient cohorts, and the hazard ratio with 95% confidence intervals, and the log-rank P-values were calculated. Each database is updated biannually. For NEK8, the Affy IDs were 1557172_x_at and 1557170_at. All probe sets per gene were selected in the probe set option.

MTT assay

Cells (5×103 cells/well) were seeded in 96-well plates in complete culture medium. After 24, 48, 72 and 96 h, the reaction was terminated by adding MTT to each well with a final concentration of 0.5 mg/ml. The reaction was allowed to proceed for 3–4 h at 37°C. The formazan crystals were then dissolved by adding 0.1 ml dimethyl sulfoxide. The intensity of the color developed, which is a reflection of the number of live cells, was measured at 490 nm using a multiwell spectrophotometer. All assays were performed with 3 replicates.

Transwell assay

SGC-7901 cell migration was evaluated using an 8-mm pore size Transwell system (Corning Star; Corning Life Sciences, Cambridge, MA, USA). Briefly, short hairpin RNA (shRNA)-transfected cells were resuspended in serum-free RPMI-1640 medium at a density of 2×105 cells/ml. The upper chamber of the Transwell was loaded with 100 µl cell suspension and the lower chamber was loaded with 0.6 ml RPMI-1640 containing 10% fetal bovine serum. Following 8 h of incubation, the cells that had migrated to the lower chamber were fixed with 100% methanol at 4°C for 15 min and stained with 0.1% crystal violet at room temperature for 15 min. The cell images were captured under a stereomicroscope (Olympus Corporation, Tokyo, Japan), then the cells were washed with in 10% acetic acid for the measurement of the optical density at a wavelength of 595 nm.

Colony formation assay

A total of 1,000 cells transfected with negative control plasmid associated with the NEK8-shRNA-transfected SGC-7901 cells were mixed with RPMI-1640 containing 0.3% agar and 10% FBS, and plated on 0.6% basal agar in triplicate 6-well plates. Each well was then further covered with RPMI-1640 containing 10% FBS and incubated at 37°C with 5% CO2 for 2 weeks, prior to the colony numbers being counted by eye.

Antitumor activity assay in vivo

BALB/C-nu/nu mice aged 4–5 weeks were obtained from Zhejiang Academy of Medical Sciences (Hangzhou, China). A total of 24 male mice (mean weight, ~20 g) were housed in sterile cages under laminar airflow hoods at 20°C in a specific pathogen-free environment under a 12-h light/dark cycle and provided with autoclaved chow and water ad libitum. The present study was ethically approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Taizhou College of Medicine (approval, no. TZYXY2017-003; Taizhou, China). A total of 1×106 SGC-7901 and SNU-1 gastric cancer cells were transfected with 1 µg negative control shRNA or NEK8 shRNA, separately. The shRNA-transfected cells were transplanted subcutaneously into the left and right flanks of the mice, respectively. Tumor volumes were measured with calipers twice per week and were calculated as: Volume=(width)2 × length/2 (3). After 3 weeks, animals were sacrificed by cervical dissociation and the solid tumors were removed and weighed. The largest diameter of tumors developed in all mice examined was 1.634 cm, with no multiple tumors.

Statistical analysis

The data were analyzed using SPSS 13.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The results were compared using one-way analysis of variance followed by Dunnett's post-hoc test for multiple comparisons. All results are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation from three replicates. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results

pVHL interacts with NEK8 in SGC-7901 cells

In a previous study, it was demonstrated that pVHL may regulate NEK8 indirectly via the HIF-1 signaling pathway (17). To verify whether pVHL interacts with NEK8 in cells, immunoprecipitation was performed. As indicated in Fig. 1A, the pull-down effect of the anti-VHL antibody on NEK8 protein was marked, indicating an association between the two proteins. Further investigation was required to examine whether pVHL interacts with NEK8 directly.
Figure 1.

pVHL interacts with NEK8 and promotes NEK8 degradation through the proteasome-ubiquitination signaling pathway. (A) Immunoprecipitation and immunoblot analysis revealing the protein association between pVHL and NEK8. (B) Treatment with the 26S proteasome inhibitor, MG-132 (10 µM), rescued the downregulation of NEK-8 in the pVHL-overexpressing SGC-7901 cells. (C) pVHL promotes NEK8 degradation. (D) pVHL promoted NEK8 ubiquitination. VHL, von-Hippel-Lindau tumor suppressor protein; NEK8, never-in-mitosis A-related kinase 8; EGFP, enhanced green fluorescent protein; HA, influenza hemagglutinin; Ub, ubiquitin; IgG, rabbit immunoglobulin G; IP, immunoprecipitation; CHX, cycloheximide; vector, vector of VHL; WB, western blotting.

pVHL promotes NEK8 protein degradation via the proteasome-ubiquitin signaling pathway

The present study proposed that pVHL, an E3 ligase, may promote the degradation of NEK8 protein. Firstly, cells were treated with the 26S proteasome inhibitor, MG-132 (10 µM). This proteasome inhibitor rescued the reduction in NEK8 expression levels induced by pVHL overexpression, indicating that pVHL may mediate the decrease in NEK8 protein by proteasome-executed degradation (Fig. 1B). Subsequently, the half-life of NEK8 protein was determined in the presence or absence of pVHL overexpression. SGC-7901 cells were transfected with pVHL and NEK8 expression levels were subsequently evaluated by immunoblot analysis at various time points following the inhibition of de novo protein synthesis by CHX. The half-life of NEK8 was reduced from >30 to <15 min when pVHL was ectopically expressed (Fig. 1C). The findings of the present study demonstrated that pVHL may promote the rapid degradation of NEK8. To further confirm whether pVHL promotes NEK8 degradation via the ubiquitin-proteasomal pathway, an ubiquitination experiment was performed. SGC-7901 cells were co-transfected with GFP-NEK8, HA-Ub and pVHL plasmids. Immunoprecipitation was performed with anti-GFP or IgG antibodies, and the ubiquitination of NEK8 was evaluated by western blotting with an anti-HA antibody. As indicated in Fig. 1D, pVHL promoted the ubiquitination NEK8.

NEK8 promotes cancer progression

The Kaplan-Meier estimate was used to assess the effects of 54,675 genes on survival using 1,065 cancer samples from patients with GC, with a mean follow-up of 33 months (http://kmplot.com/analysis/). The primary purpose of the tool is meta-analysis-based biomarker assessment. Online analysis using Kaplan-Meier survival plots based on the transcriptomic data of 1,065 patients demonstrated that higher expression levels of NEK8 may lead to poor survival in patients with GC (Fig. 2). All analyses were conducted using standard procedures (19).
Figure 2.

NEK8 expression levels and gastric cancer survival. Kaplan-Meier survival plots demonstrated that higher expression levels of NEK8 may lead to poor survival rate. HR, hazard ratio; NEK8, never-in-mitosis A-related kinase 8.

To confirm whether NEK8 may promote the progression of cancer, NEK8 expression was downregulated by shRNA. As demonstrated by western blotting (Fig. 3A), NEK8 was efficiently knocked down in SGC-7901 and SNU-1 cells. In addition, NEK8 downregulation inhibited the proliferation, colony formation ability and migration of SGC-7901 and SNU-1 cells (Fig. 3B-D).
Figure 3.

Knockdown of NEK8 prevents gastric cancer progression. (A) NEK8 protein expression levels in SGC-7901 and SNU-1 cells transfected with control-shRNA or NEK8-shRNA were analyzed by immunoblotting. (B) MTT, (C) colony formation and (D) Transwell assay for SGC-7901 and SNU-1 cells subsequent to transfection with control or NEK8 shRNA. Colony numbers were counted after 13 days in culture. *P<0.01 NEK8-shRNA compared with control-shRNA. NEK8, never-in-mitosis A-related kinase 8; shRNA, short hairpin RNA; NC, negative control; siRNA, small interfering RNA; OD, optical density.

Based on the aforementioned in vitro findings, the present study investigated whether NEK8 may serve a role in gastric cancer cell proliferation in vivo. SGC-7901 and SNU-1 cells transfected with control or NEK8-shRNAs were implanted subcutaneously into the flanks of female nude mice, respectively. As presented in Fig. 4, implanted control cells formed significantly larger tumors compared with NEK8-shRNAs-transfected cells. Additional research is required to investigate the potential underlying mechanisms.
Figure 4.

RNA interference depletion of NEK8 inhibits gastric cancer cell growth in vivo. NEK8, never-in-mitosis A-related kinase 8; shRNA, short hairpin RNA; NC, negative control.

Discussion

In the present study, it was demonstrated that pVHL may interact with NEK8 in vitro, as determined by immunoprecipitation, and that pVHL may promote NEK8 degradation via the ubiquitin-proteasome signaling pathway. Additionally, NEK8-knockdown mediated by shRNA inhibited of the proliferation, colony formation and migration of the GC SGC-7901 cell line in vitro, and proliferation in vivo. Bowers and Boylan (21) reported that NEK8 may be a novel tumor-associated gene as revealed by its variable expression in healthy human breast tissue and breast tumors. It has been reported that NEK8 may serve a critical role in the development of cancer via the regulation of DNA damage/repair (17). The present study generated Kaplan-Meier survival plots, which revealed that higher expression levels of NEK8 were associated with a poor survival rate. Furthermore, the present study revealed that RNAi-mediated knockdown of NEK8 effectively suppressed GC cell proliferation, soft-agar colony formation and migration in vitro, and xenograft growth in vivo. The aforementioned data indicate a possible role for NEK8 in gastric tumor progression. Indirect regulation of NEK8 by pVHL via the HIF-1 signaling pathway has been reported (19). The association between pVHL and NEK8 in SGC-7901 cells was investigated in the present study. Numerous HIF-independent roles of pVHL have been observed by biochemical interactions (22). However, the most documented function of pVHL is its role as the substrate-recognition component of an E3 ubiquitin ligase complex (20). This suggests that NEK8 may serve as a novel target of pVHL. The results of the present study revealed the promoting effects of pVHL on NEK8 protein degradation and ubiquitination. In addition, the study suggested that MG-132 rescued the reduction in NEK8 expression levels induced by pVHL overexpression, which supported the aforementioned hypothesis. In summary, the findings of the present study may provide novel insight into the signaling pathway underlying the regulation of NEK8 in cancer. Additionally, the data of the present study may provide further insight into the role of pVHL in NEK8 regulation, as well as the role of the NEK8 in the progression of GC. This may improve the understanding of tumor progression and contribute to the development of novel therapeutic strategies.
  21 in total

1.  THE TWO HISTOLOGICAL MAIN TYPES OF GASTRIC CARCINOMA: DIFFUSE AND SO-CALLED INTESTINAL-TYPE CARCINOMA. AN ATTEMPT AT A HISTO-CLINICAL CLASSIFICATION.

Authors:  P LAUREN
Journal:  Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand       Date:  1965

2.  Nek8, a NIMA family kinase member, is overexpressed in primary human breast tumors.

Authors:  Alex J Bowers; John F Boylan
Journal:  Gene       Date:  2004-03-17       Impact factor: 3.688

3.  Nek8 couples renal ciliopathies to DNA damage and checkpoint control.

Authors:  Peter K Jackson
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2013-08-22       Impact factor: 17.970

4.  Mutations in NEK8 link multiple organ dysplasia with altered Hippo signalling and increased c-MYC expression.

Authors:  Valeska Frank; Sandra Habbig; Malte P Bartram; Tobias Eisenberger; Hermine E Veenstra-Knol; Christian Decker; Reinder A C Boorsma; Heike Göbel; Gudrun Nürnberg; Anabel Griessmann; Mareike Franke; Lori Borgal; Priyanka Kohli; Linus A Völker; Jörg Dötsch; Peter Nürnberg; Thomas Benzing; Hanno J Bolz; Colin Johnson; Erica H Gerkes; Bernhard Schermer; Carsten Bergmann
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 6.150

5.  The tumor suppressor pVHL down-regulates never-in-mitosis A-related kinase 8 via hypoxia-inducible factors to maintain cilia in human renal cancer cells.

Authors:  Xiao-Fei Ding; Jun Zhou; Qiong-Ying Hu; Shuang-Chun Liu; Guang Chen
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2014-12-01       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  Purification, cloning, and characterization of Nek8, a novel NIMA-related kinase, and its candidate substrate Bicd2.

Authors:  Pamela M Holland; Alison Milne; Kirsten Garka; Richard S Johnson; Cynthia Willis; John E Sims; Charles T Rauch; Timothy A Bird; G Duke Virca
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2002-02-25       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  Nek8 regulates the expression and localization of polycystin-1 and polycystin-2.

Authors:  Eisei Sohara; Ying Luo; Jingjing Zhang; Danielle K Manning; David R Beier; Jing Zhou
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2008-01-30       Impact factor: 10.121

8.  Nek family of kinases in cell cycle, checkpoint control and cancer.

Authors:  Larissa Moniz; Previn Dutt; Nasir Haider; Vuk Stambolic
Journal:  Cell Div       Date:  2011-10-31       Impact factor: 5.130

9.  Maintenance of cancer stemness by miR-196b-5p contributes to chemoresistance of colorectal cancer cells via activating STAT3 signaling pathway.

Authors:  Dong Ren; Bihua Lin; Xin Zhang; Yao Peng; Ziyu Ye; Yan Ma; Yangfang Liang; Longbin Cao; Xiangyong Li; Ronggang Li; Lixia Sun; Qiongru Liu; Jinhua Wu; Keyuan Zhou; Jincheng Zeng
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-07-25

Review 10.  Cell cycle regulation by the NEK family of protein kinases.

Authors:  Andrew M Fry; Laura O'Regan; Sarah R Sabir; Richard Bayliss
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2012-11-06       Impact factor: 5.285

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  The NEK family of serine/threonine kinases as a biomarker for cancer.

Authors:  Nagesh Kishan Panchal; Sabina Evan Prince
Journal:  Clin Exp Med       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 3.984

2.  Genetic and Epigenetic Mechanisms Deregulate the CRL2pVHL Complex in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Brenda C Minatel; David E Cohn; Michelle E Pewarchuk; Mateus C Barros-Filho; Adam P Sage; Greg L Stewart; Erin A Marshall; Nikita Telkar; Victor D Martinez; Patricia P Reis; Wendy P Robinson; Wan L Lam
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 4.772

3.  The pVHL neglected functions, a tale of hypoxia-dependent and -independent regulations in cancer.

Authors:  Giovanni Minervini; Maria Pennuto; Silvio C E Tosatto
Journal:  Open Biol       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 6.411

4.  Seven Novel Genes Related to Cell Proliferation and Migration of VHL-Mutated Pheochromocytoma.

Authors:  Shuai Gao; Longfei Liu; Zhuolin Li; Yingxian Pang; Jiaqi Shi; Feizhou Zhu
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 5.555

5.  Potential Prognostic Biomarkers of NIMA (Never in Mitosis, Gene A)-Related Kinase (NEK) Family Members in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Gangga Anuraga; Wei-Jan Wang; Nam Nhut Phan; Nu Thuy An Ton; Hoang Dang Khoa Ta; Fidelia Berenice Prayugo; Do Thi Minh Xuan; Su-Chi Ku; Yung-Fu Wu; Vivin Andriani; Muhammad Athoillah; Kuen-Haur Lee; Chih-Yang Wang
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2021-10-26

Review 6.  Checking NEKs: Overcoming a Bottleneck in Human Diseases.

Authors:  Andressa Peres de Oliveira; Luidy Kazuo Issayama; Isadora Carolina Betim Pavan; Fernando Riback Silva; Talita Diniz Melo-Hanchuk; Fernando Moreira Simabuco; Jörg Kobarg
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-04-13       Impact factor: 4.411

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.