Chengkang Zhang1, Hyung Joo Lee2, Anura Shrivastava3, Ruipeng Wang3, Travis J McQuiston3, Sharon S Challberg3, Brian A Pollok3, Ting Wang4. 1. Propagenix, 9605 Medical Center Drive, Suite 325, Rockville, MD 20850, USA. Electronic address: ck.zhang@propagenix.com. 2. Department of Genetics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63108, USA; The Edison Family Center for Genome Sciences and Systems Biology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63108, USA. 3. Propagenix, 9605 Medical Center Drive, Suite 325, Rockville, MD 20850, USA. 4. Department of Genetics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63108, USA; The Edison Family Center for Genome Sciences and Systems Biology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63108, USA. Electronic address: twang@wustl.edu.
Abstract
Despite substantial self-renewal capability in vivo, epithelial stem and progenitor cells located in various tissues expand for a few passages in vitro in feeder-free condition before they succumb to growth arrest. Here, we describe the EpiX method, which utilizes small molecules that inhibit PAK1-ROCK-Myosin II and TGF-β signaling to achieve over one trillion-fold expansion of human epithelial stem and progenitor cells from skin, airway, mammary, and prostate glands in the absence of feeder cells. Transcriptomic and epigenomic studies show that this condition helps epithelial cells to overcome stresses for continuous proliferation. EpiX-expanded basal epithelial cells differentiate into mature epithelial cells consistent with their tissue origins. Whole-genome sequencing reveals that the cells retain remarkable genome integrity after extensive in vitro expansion without acquiring tumorigenicity. EpiX technology provides a solution to exploit the potential of tissue-resident epithelial stem and progenitor cells for regenerative medicine.
Despite substantial self-renewal capability in vivo, epithelial stem and progenitor cells located in various tissues expand for a few passages in vitro in feeder-free condition before they succumb to growth arrest. Here, we describe the EpiX method, which utilizes small molecules that inhibit PAK1-ROCK-Myosin II and TGF-β signaling to achieve over one trillion-fold expansion of human epithelial stem and progenitor cells from skin, airway, mammary, and prostate glands in the absence of feeder cells. Transcriptomic and epigenomic studies show that this condition helps epithelial cells to overcome stresses for continuous proliferation. EpiX-expanded basal epithelial cells differentiate into mature epithelial cells consistent with their tissue origins. Whole-genome sequencing reveals that the cells retain remarkable genome integrity after extensive in vitro expansion without acquiring tumorigenicity. EpiX technology provides a solution to exploit the potential of tissue-resident epithelial stem and progenitor cells for regenerative medicine.
Tissue-resident stem cells ensure homeostasis and tissue repair throughout
the lifetime of an individual. In various epithelia, the stem and progenitor cells
residing in the basal layer are marked by KRT5 and TP63 and have infinite
self-renewal capability in vivo (Blanpain and Fuchs, 2014; Donati and
Watt, 2015; Hogan et al., 2014;
Rock et al., 2010). However, it has been
difficult to extensively expand epithelial cells in vitro in
feeder-free condition due to the CDKN2A-dependent stasis (Shay and Wright, 2007). Immortalization using telomerase
reverse transcriptase (TERT) or viral genes (SV40T or HPV16 E6/E7) significantly
alters epithelial cells behavior, limiting their utility for studying normal biology
or as drug-screening models (Miller and Spence,
2017). Lack of suitable long-term expansion methods has hampered
epithelial stem cell biology study in vitro and greatly stalled
advances in regenerative medicine exploiting their potential. Pluripotent stem cells
(PSCs), including induced PSCs, have been the subject of intense research in the
hope that they offer physiology-relevant models and solutions for regenerative
medicine. However, they face challenges including donor variability, acquired
oncogenic mutations, and inefficient differentiation toward mature cell types (Avior et al., 2016; Merkle et al., 2017).Encouraging progress has been made in developing methods that allow
continuous in vitro propagation of epithelial cells. Liu et al.
proposed that feeder cells and Rho-kinase (ROCK) inhibitor Y-27632
“conditionally reprogrammed” (CR) epithelial cells to proliferate
continuously (Butler et al., 2016; Chapman et al., 2010; Liu et al., 2012; Suprynowicz et al., 2012). The Stingl group used a similar approach to
expand mammary repopulating units, an indication of the expansion of mammary
epithelial progenitors (Prater et al., 2014).
The CR method has garnered interest due to its successful use in expanding
patient-derived epithelial cells to identify effective therapy (Crystal et al., 2014; Yuan et al., 2012). Wang et al.
(2015) used feeder cells and several small molecules regulating
TGF-β, WNT, and NOTCH pathways to expand “ground-state intestinal stem
cells.” However, the use of feeder cells complicates the interpretation of
signaling events that govern cell proliferation and creates challenges in meeting
regulatory expectation for manufacturing cell therapy products (Lipsitz et al., 2016).The Clevers group has led the way in developing feeder-free 3D organoids for
intestinal stem cells (Sato et al., 2009,
2011), which has later expanded to
epithelial cells from liver, pancreas, and stomach (Boj et al., 2015; Huch et al.,
2013, 2015). Stem cells,
progenitors, and differentiated epithelial cells are present in the organoid, making
it a good in vitro model for epithelial cell biology. Katsuda et al. (2017) reported the use of small
molecules, including Y-27632, A83-01, and CHIR99021, which converted rodent
hepatocytes into proliferative bipotent cells; however, it did not work for human
hepatocytes.To develop medium formulations that address aforementioned issues, including
safety, reproducibility, and scale-up compatibility, we set off to identify small
molecules that support long-term epithelial cell expansion without feeder cells. We
found that the combination of TGF-β signaling inhibition, PAK1-ROCK-Myosin II
inhibition, and low extracellular [Ca2+] were key components that
transformed traditional culture medium to enable long-term propagation of epithelial
cells from various tissues. High single-cell cloning efficiency and the ability to
differentiate into tissue-specific mature epithelial cell types suggested that stem
and progenitor cells were preserved during expansion. Remarkably, the cells retained
genome integrity with no tumorigenic mutations after extensive expansion as assessed
by multiple approaches including whole-genome sequencing. Gradual changes in DNA
methylation landscape were the by-product of long-term culture and had little impact
on overall gene expression profile.
RESULTS
TGF-β Signaling Inhibition and ROCK Inhibition Synergistically Support
Long-Term Epithelial Cell Expansion in the Absence of Feeder Cells
As epithelial cells quickly cease proliferation when the feeder cells or
Y-27632 are omitted from the CR method (Liu et
al., 2012), we designed a proliferation assay to pharmacologically
screen a focused collection of small molecules modulating diverse biological
pathways governing stem cell self-renewal and differentiation (Table S1) to develop feeder-free
condition that supports continuous cell proliferation. Human prostate epithelial
cells (PrECs), bronchial epithelial cells (HBECs), and foreskin keratinocytes
(HFKs) were transduced by lentiviruses expressing nuclear-localized red
fluorescent protein (nRFP) to facilitate automatic cell count. The lentivirus
transduction did not alter cell proliferation. Late-passage cells were cultured
for 7 days in the absence of feeder cells and Y-27632 to screen small molecules.
We found that small molecules that inhibit TGF-β signaling (A83-01,
RepSOX, GW788388, SB431542) or ROCK (SR3677, Y-27632, Thiazovivin, GSK429286)
supported continuous cell proliferation at micromolar concentrations in the F
medium (Figure 1A). Small molecules that
affect the WNT pathway by inhibiting GSK3 (BIO, CHIR99021, BIO-acetoxime,
endo-IWR1), or inhibit Abl kinase (AP24534), or increase intracellular cAMP
level (forskolin), or target the NOTCH pathway (DAPT), also supported continuous
cell proliferation to certain degrees (Figures 1A and S1).
Importantly, we found that TGF-β signaling inhibitor (0.5–2
μM A83-01) and ROCK inhibitor (5–10 μM Y-27632)
synergistically promoted epithelial cell proliferation (Figures 1B and S1). PrECs grew for >28
population doublings (PDs) in the F medium plus A83-01 and Y-27632 (F+Y+A)
(Figure S1), much
longer than in the control PrGM. Still, the cells stopped proliferation after
several passages in F+Y+A medium, which was significantly shorter than in the CR
condition (Figures 1C and S1) and suggested that additional
optimization could further improve their expansion.
Figure 1.
TGF-β Signaling Inhibition, ROCK Inhibition, and Low Calcium
Synergistically Support Long-Term Epithelial Cell Proliferation
(A) Small molecules inhibiting the TGF-β signaling or ROCK
supported the proliferation of late-passage PrECs/nRFP cells in the absence of
feeder cells in the F medium. Data are represented as mean ±SD, n =
4.
(B) Synergy between A83-01 and Y-27632 in the F medium (four replicates
per condition).
(C and F) PrECs/nRFP cells proliferated for 10 PDs in the F medium plus
Y-27632 and A83-01 (F+Y+A) but continued to proliferate in the CR condition (C).
Many cells in F+Y+A exhibited differentiated morphology (F).
(D) ROCK inhibitors synergistically promoted the proliferation of
HBECs/nRFP cells in KSFM plus 1 μM A83-01.
(E) Synergy between A83-01 and Y-27632 in KSFM (four replicates per
condition).
(G) Morphology of HFKs over successive passages in KSFM (P1 and P5) or
the EpiX medium (P2, P11, and P20).
(H) TP63 was ubiquitously expressed in late-passage HFKs (P16) cultured
in the EpiX medium.
(I-L) Expansion of HFKs (I), PrECs (J), HBECs (K), and mammary
epithelial cells (L) in KSFM or EpiX.
Low Calcium Concentration Enhances the Growth-Promotion Effect of
TGF-β Signaling Inhibition and PAK1-ROCK-Myosin II Inhibition
F medium contains ~1.4 mM CaCl2, which is known to
promote epithelial cell differentiation (Hennings et al., 1980; Martin et
al., 1991), so we conjectured that low [CaCl2] might
further promote cell growth. We used keratinocyte-SFM (KSFM) that contains 90
μM CaCl2 to pan the small molecules and observed similar
synergy between TGF-β and ROCK inhibitors (Figures 1D, 1E, and S2). HBECs and PrECs achieved
>1,000,000-fold expansion in KSFM plus A83-01 and Y-27632 (K+A+Y) versus
control (Figure S2).
This confirmed that neither TGF-β nor ROCK inhibition alone supports
extended epithelial cell proliferation (Chapman
et al., 2014; Natarajan et al.,
2006). In KSFM, TGF-β inhibition had the biggest impact on
cell growth, while in the F medium ROCK inhibition was the primary hit (Figures 1D and 1E). Interestingly, elevating
the [Ca2+] in KSFM reduced the growth-promoting effect of A83-01 but
boosted the effect of Y-27632 (Figure S3). Additionally, we found that IPA-3 (inhibitor for PAK1)
or blebbistatin (inhibitor for Myosin II) synergistically promoted cell
proliferation with A83-01 (Figures 1D and
S2). HBECs,
keratinocytes (neonatal and adult), and PrECs expanded for
>1,000,000-fold in KSFM plus A83–01 and IPA-3 or blebbistatin over
KSFM control (Figure
S2). These findings suggested that, in the absence of feeder cells,
inhibiting PAK1-ROCK-Myosin II axis promoted epithelial cell proliferation in
low-calcium medium when the TGF-β signaling was also suppressed.We sieved the small molecules with the K+A+Y medium and found some
agents that further promoted cell proliferation, including IBMX, 8-bromo-cAMP,
prostaglandin E2, and DPPIV inhibitor (Figure S2). Notably, the synergy
between A83-01 and Y-27632 was independent of KSFM, as they also supported
long-term epithelial cell expansion in BEGM (Lonza), Bronchia-Life (Lifeline),
or LHC-9 (GIBCO) (data not shown). We used KSFM plus 1 μM A83-01, 5
μM Y-27632, and 3 μM isoproterenol and dubbed it epithelial
expansion medium (EpiX). Panning the small molecules using the EpiX medium did
not reveal any significant hits.We have established epithelial cell cultures from neonatal foreskin,
adult skin, nasal, bronchial, prostate, mammary, and other tissues using the
EpiX medium and propagated them for 40–90 PDs (Figures 1I-1L and S4), far beyond the 15–25
PDs obtained in conventional media. We routinely generated >50 million
epithelial cells from nasal brushing samples in 3–4 weeks (Figure S4). EpiX medium
supported multi-round single-cell cloning with high efficiency, suggesting that
epithelial stem and progenitor cells were preserved during the clonal expansion.
This allowed us to knock the GFP gene into the AAVS1 locus in HFKs using
CRISPR/Cas9 for clonal expansion (Figure S5).
Transcriptome Dynamics of Epithelial Cells Expanded in the EpiX
Medium
We examined HFKs and HBECs cultured in the EpiX medium by qRT-PCR and
found the cells maintained steady expression of basal cell markers
(ITGA6, ITGB4, KRT14,
KRT5, TP63; Table S2). Immunofluorescence
staining demonstrated that all cells strongly expressed TP63 (Figure 1H). PSC markers (LIN28A,
NANOG, OCT4) and other stem cell markers
(CD34, AXIN2, LGR5,
PROM1) were not activated, indicating that EpiX did not
reprogram the cell identity (Table S2). Markers of differentiated cells (IVL,
LOR, MUC5AC, SFTPB,
SGCB1A1, FOXJ1) were absent in the
proliferating cells. Interestingly, qRT-PCR assay detected weak expression of
TERT in PrECs and HBECs cultured in EpiX similar to that in
the CR method (Figure
S6). Genes involved in stress responses and senescence
(AKT1, ATM, CDKN2A,
GADD45A, GLB1, PLAU,
SERPINE1) expressed at much lower levels in cells cultured
in the EpiX than in KSFM (Figure S6), suggesting that the EpiX medium alleviated various
stresses.To assess the global impact of EpiX medium on gene expression, we
compared a total of 14 HFK transcriptomes under various conditions by RNA
sequencing (RNA-seq) (Figure 2A; Table S3), which
recapitulated the sustained expression of basal cell markers and absence of PSCs
and terminal differentiation markers (Figure S6; Table S2). Globally, two
transcriptomic shift trends were illustrated by principal-component analysis
(PCA) (Figure 2B), with a major shift
associated with media change and a minor shift associated with long-term
culture. We identified 1,277 differentially expressed genes in HFKs expanded in
EpiX versus in KSFM, comprising 315 upregulated and 962 downregulated genes
(Figure 2C; Table S3). Downregulated genes were
enriched in cell-cell interaction, interferon signaling, extracellular matrix
organization, and cytokine signaling (Figure
2F). As expected, we observed significant downregulation of genes
involved in senescence (PLAU, SERPINE1,
VIM) and the TGF-β pathway (FN1,
SKIL, ITGB6) (Figures 2C, 2D, and S6). Importantly, the downregulated
genes were de-repressed when HFKs were withdrawn from the EpiX medium (Figure 2E), suggesting that repression of
these genes in EpiX was not a permanent but reversible process.
Figure 2.
Transcriptome Analysis of HFKs Expanded with the EpiX Medium
(A) Experimental scheme of HFK expansion in KSFM or the EpiX medium and
time points for samples collection. HFKs underwent three different routes:
(1)stasis in KSFM (P2→P5); (2) transient exposure and withdrawal from the
EpiX medium (P2→P3→P4); and (3) expansion in the EpiX medium and
withdrawal at late passage (P3→P12→P19→P20). Each sample
was collected in duplicate.
(B) PCA on HFK transcriptomes in various conditions. The red arrows
represented the direction of culture condition changes.
(C) MA plot of differentially expressed genes in two different media.
The red dots represented differentially expressed genes.
(D) Temporal expression changes of two top downregulated genes, VIM
(solid line) and FN1 (dashed line).
(E) Heatmap of 962 downregulated genes in HFKs expanded with the EpiX
medium. These downregulated genes were de-repressed when the HFKs were withdrawn
from EpiX medium. The red arrows indicated EpiX medium withdrawal.
(F) Gene ontology (GO) and pathway enrichment analysis of upregulated
and downregulated genes by metascape tool.
Epithelial Cells Expanded with EpiX Medium Retain Remarkable Genome
Stability
Epithelial cells generally encounter stasis around passage 5–6 in
conventional media (Shay and Wright,
2005, 2007), while a few cells may
acquire spontaneous suppression of CDKN2A to evade stasis and eventually result
in chromosome abnormality and oncogenic mutations (Romanov et al., 2001). We examined HFKs, HBECs, and
PrECs cultured for over 40 PDs in the EpiX medium and found they all retained
normal diploids (Figure 3A). Whole-genome
sequencing (WGS) of HBECs from a cystic fibrosispatient (CF) and HFKs only
found 5,083 de novo single-nucleotide variations (SNVs) in the
CF sample after 43 PDs, and 4,800 de novo SNVs in the HFK
sample after 42 PDs (Figure 3D; Table S4). Average SNV
rate was 1.97 × 10−8/bp/generation in the CF and 1.90
× 10−8/bp/generation in the HFKs, close to the 1.5
× 10−8/bp/generation rate observed in germline cells
(Rahbari et al., 2016). Less than
0.4% (39/9,844) of those SNVs were common between the CF and HFK samples and
they all located in non-coding areas and none had known detrimental effects
(Figure 3D; Table S4). Over 99.2% of the 9,844
SNVs located outside coding regions, and the remaining (25 in CF and 24 in HFK)
led to heterozygous missense variants (Table S4). We did not detect any
mutation in oncogenes (e.g., MYC, RAS) or
tumor suppressor genes (e.g., TP53, RB),
suggesting that the EpiX medium neither induced nor favored oncogenic mutations.
Whole genome-sequencing revealed 60 small insertions and deletions (InDel) in
the CF sample and 26 InDel in the HFK sample, all located in introns or
intergenic regions (Table
S4). Twenty-four copy number variations (CNVs) affecting 1.7 Mb (CF)
and one 86-kb CNV (HFK) all located in repeat elements (Table S4; Figure S7). We found one structural
variation (SV) in the CF sample and two in the HFK sample (Table S4). None of these CNVs or
SVs are functionally linked to tumors. We injected 1 × 107
young HFKs (<20 PDs) differentiated in a high-calcium medium for 7 days
(see below), old HFKs (>50 PDs) differentiated for 7 days, or old HFKs
(>50 PDs) in active proliferation subcutaneously into nude mice, and
found no tumors after 12 weeks (Figure 3B),
indicating that EpiX-expanded epithelial cells were not tumorigenic.
Figure 3.
Genome Stability of Epithelial Cells Expanded with the EpiX Medium
(A) HFKs, HBECs, and PrECs expanded with the EpiX medium over 40 PDs
retained diploid karyotypes.
(B) EpiX-expanded HFKs did not form tumors after 12 weeks in female nude
mice (1 × 107 cells per mouse, n = 6 in each group). Data are
represented as mean ±SD, n = 6.
(C) Data analysis workflow for whole-genome sequencing.
(D) Distributions of de novo SNVs identified by whole
genome-sequencing in late-passage HFK and CF samples. Venn diagram showed the
overlap between the CF and HFK samples.
(E) Genes that were affected by missense de novo SNV
(all heterozygous) after 40 PDs expansion in the EpiX medium. Two separate
missense SNVs were found in the DDX11 gene in the CF and HFK
samples.
Tissue-Restricted Differentiation of Epithelial Cells after Long-Term
Expansion in EpiX Medium
Increasing [Ca2+] above 1 mM in the EpiX medium quickly led
to the formation of tight junctions stained positive for ZO-1 and Occludin
(Figures 4A and 4B). Mini-domes
occurred sporadically in confluent HFKs or HBECs cultured in EpiX with 1 mM
CaCl2 (Figures 4C and 4D).
An intact epithelium sheet could be released by Dispase to create cultured
epidermal grafts (Green, 2008) (Figure 4E). HFKs cultured at the air-liquid
interface (ALI) matured into stratified epithelium after 2 weeks (Figure 4F). As expected (Doran et al., 1980), EpiX-expanded HFKs injected
subcutaneously into immunodeficientmice formed epidermis-like cystic epithelium
after 5 weeks, with basal cell layer stained positive for KRT14 and Ki67 (Figures 4H and 4I), spinous cell layers, a
granular cell layer with evident keratohyaline granules, and several cornified
layers (Figure 4G). Bioluminescence imaging
(the HFKs were engineered to express firefly luciferase) confirmed the presence
of HFKs 4 months after engraftment in the mice, indicating that EpiX-expanded
HFKs retained self-renewal capability in vivo (Figure S8).
Figure 4.
Differentiation of HFKs Expanded with the EpiX Medium
(A) Addition of 1 mM CaCl2 to the EpiX medium induced the
HFKs to differentiate in 24 hr.
(B) Immunofluorescence staining of tight junctions (ZO-1 and Occludin)
in HFKs cultured in EpiX plus 1 mM CaCl2 for 7 days. ZO-1, zonula
occludens-1.
(C and D) Confluent HFKs in EpiX (C) or EpiX plus 1 mM CaCl2
(D). Many domes with liquid accumulated underneath occurred in the culture with
EpiX plus 1 mM CaCl2.
(E) HFKs cultured in a T-75 flask in EpiX plus 1.5 mM CaCl2
for 7 days form an intact epithelium sheet, which was released from the flask
after 30-min incubation in dispase at 37°C.
(F) HFKs were differentiated at ALI for 14 days and formed a stratified
epithelium.
(G) EpiX-expanded HFKs were subcutaneously injected into
immune-comprised mice. After 5 weeks, the cells formed cysts which resembled
epidermis.
(H) Most cells in the basal layer were stained positive for the
proliferation marker Ki67.
(I) The basal and supra-basal layers of the cystic epithelium stained
positive for KRT14 (K14).
HBECs cultured in standard BEGM lose the ability to differentiate into
mucociliary epithelium after four to five passages (Neuberger et al., 2011). HBECs from several healthy
and CF donors grew for 45–60 PDs (12–16 passages) in the EpiX
medium (Figure 5A), and readily
differentiated into mucociliary epithelium at ALI or bronchospheres in Matrigel.
Cilia of the multiciliated cells spontaneously beat (Videos S1 and S2) and stained positive for
acetylated tubulin, and mucin-producing goblet cells stained positive by alcian
blue or an anti-MUC5AC antibody (Figures 5C and
5D). High expression of differentiated cell markers
(FOXJ1A, MUC5AC, SCGB1A1)
was revealed by qRT-PCR (Figure 5B). The
mucociliary epithelium also maintained physiological functions, showing a
significant increase in MUC5AC+ goblet cells upon IL-13 stimulation
(Figures 5D). Additionally, ion channel
physiology expected for their CFTR genotypes was maintained after >30 PDs
(Figure 5E). For HBECs from a healthy
donor, CFTR activity was readily stimulated by 10 μM forskolin, and
diminished by the inhibitor CFTRinh-172. For CF cells with a rare CFTR variant
(ΔF508:Q685TfsX4), the CFTR corrector (3 μM VX-809) with the
potentiator (100 nM VX-770) increased transepithelial Cl−
transport (Figure 5E). Amiloride-sensitive
epithelial sodium channel and calcium-dependent chloride channel activities were
also observed. Importantly, the response of CF cells to CFTR modulators did not
decline in late-passage cells (Figure
5E).
Figure 5.
Differentiation of HBECs Expanded with the EpiX Medium
(A) HBECs from healthy and CF donors (n = 4) were expanded in the EpiX
medium or conventional medium (BEGM). EpiX medium supported million-fold more
expansion than BEGM (n = 2).
(B) HBECs from a healthy (UNC42I) or a CF donor were expanded in the
EpiX medium for 30 PDs and differentiated at ALI for 21 days. The expression of
basal cell markers (TP63, NGFR), multiciliated
cell markers (CFTR, FOXJ1A), goblet cell
marker (MUC5AC), club cell marker (CC10), or
type II cell marker (SFTPD) were checked by qRT-PCR. Gene
expression levels were depicted as relative to that of β-actin, which was
set at 1. Data are represented as mean ± SD, n = 3.
(C) UNC42I cells (P8) were differentiated at ALI for 21 days. Paraffin
sections were stained with H&E, or with an anti-acetylated tubulin antibody,
or with alcian blue to show multiciliated cells and goblet cells.
(D) UNC42I cells (P7) were differentiated at ALI and treated with 1
ng/mL IL-13. Multiciliated cells and goblet cells were stained with
anti-acetylated tubulin (in green) or anti-MUC5AC (in red) antibodies
respectively. IL-13 led to goblet cell hyperplasia and a decrease of
multiciliated cells.
(E) Early- (15 PDs) and late-passage (30 PDs) CF cells were
differentiated at ALI for Ussing assays, using either the Vertex or the
PneumaCult-ALI protocol. The activities of ENaC (ΔAmiloride, 30 μM
amiloride), CFTR (ΔFsk peak, 10 μM forskolin; ΔVX-770 peak
and ΔVX-770 plateau, 100 nM VX-770 and 3 μM VX-809) and CaCC
(ΔUTP, 100 μM UTP) were measured. VX-809, a CFTR trafficking
corrector; VX-770, a CFTR potentiator. The responses of mutant CFTR variants to
the CFTR corrector (3 μM VX-809) and CFTR potentiator (100 nM VX-770)
were similar between early and late passages. Data are represented as mean
± SD, n = 3.
Telomere Length and DNA Methylation Landscape Gradually Change over Long-Term
In Vitro Expansion
As shown in Figure 1G,
early-passage epithelial cells in the EpiX medium were small with a high
nuclear/cytoplasm ratio and bright under microscope. The population doubled in
<24 hr (Figures 1I-1L). Large cells
accumulated slowly over passages and eventually the majority of the population
appeared senescent or differentiated. Comparing the transcriptomes of early-
versus late-passage HFKs revealed that many genes involved in the
senescence-associated secretory phenotype (Coppé et al., 2010), including IL6,
IL8, IGFBP3, IGFBP5,
THBS1, SERPINE1, and
TGFB1I1 increased significantly in late passage (Figure S9). We examined
the telomeres length of EpiX-expanded HFKs by a qPCR method (Cawthon, 2002) and observed an inverse correlation
between the T/S ratio and the PDs (Figure
6A). Interestingly, HFKs expanded by the CR method also exhibited
telomere erosion at a similar rate (Liu et al.,
2012), suggesting that the erosion of telomeres contributed to
ultimate growth arrest in both conditions.
Figure 6.
Epigenetic Changes in HFKs Expanded with the EpiX Medium
(A) Telomere length (T/S ratio) gradually decreased in HFKs expanded in
the EpiX medium or the CR method. Data are represented as mean ±SD, n =
3.
(B) The number of differentially methylated regions (DMRs) identified
between different culture conditions. The numbers in upper right cells were DMRs
with DNA methylation gain, and the numbers in lower left cells were DMRs with
DNA methylation loss.
(C) PCA of DNA methylomes. DNA methylation levels of DMRs were used as
input data. The first principal component (passage) explained most variances
among the DNA methylomes.
(D) DNA methylation levels in HFKs gradually changed over successive
passages in the EpiX medium. The methylation levels of DMRs at P12 was
intermediate between P3 and P19. Also see Figure S10.
(E) The chromatin states of DMRs using 18 chromHMM expanded states in
keratinocytes. Lots of DMRs were in regulatory regions such as promoters and
enhancers. Also see Figure
S10.
(F) Expression changes of genes whose promoters underwent DNA
methylation changes. Expression changes were calculated as log2 of fold change
between P3 and P19. The red dots indicated the genes whose expression was
downregulated as expected from the gain of promoter methylation.
(G) Predicted cumulative population doublings (pcPDs) of HFKs based on
the DNA methylation levels at six CpG sites correlated with the actual PDs at
different passages.
We integrated methylated DNA immunoprecipitation sequencing (MeDIP-seq)
and methylation-sensitive restriction enzyme sequencing (MRE-seq) (Li et al., 2015; Maunakea et al., 2010) methods to further examine
genome-wide DNA methylation (DNAme) changes in the HFK samples that were used in
the RNA-seq study (Figure 2A; Table S5). Average DNA
methylation levels in each passage were around 70%–75% with a slight
decrease at higher passages (Figure S10), consistent with previous reports (Wilson and Jones, 1983). Bimodal distribution
revealed a lower number of highly methylated CpGs in late passages, yet the
global DNA methylation over genic regions was stable across passages (Figure S10). In contrast
to the transcriptomic shifts, PCA showed that passage number was the only factor
that drove DNA methylation change (Figure
6C). Over 2,400 differentially methylated regions (DMRs) (1,940 DNA
methylation gain and 479 DNA methylation loss) were identified along with the
increase in passages, with no statistically significant DMRs identified between
adjacent passages in different media (Figures 6B and S10). Interestingly, mid-passage (P12) HFKs exhibited intermediate DNA
methylation levels in these DMRs, confirming the DNA methylation change was
gradual across passages (Figures 6D and
S10). The DNA
methylation changes were maintained after withdrawal of EpiX medium (Figure S10), suggesting
that these changes were driven mainly by the passage number but not media
change.We next investigated the potential impact of DNA methylation changes on
gene expression. Taking advantage of the Human Reference Epigenome Map (Kundaje et al., 2015; Lowdon et al., 2014), we annotated the DMRs using
histone modification data from reference foreskin keratinocytes (E057 and E058)
and found that DMRs occurred more often than expected in promoters or enhancers
(Figures 6E and S10; Table S5). The DNA methylation
changes were weakly associated with gene expression change, and no significant
DNA methylation change was found in or around genes involved in important
signaling pathways (TGF-β, WNT) and cell cycle (Figure S10). Of all genes that
exhibited promoter DNA methylation change, 18/126 down-regulated genes and 0/6
upregulated genes showed expected gene expression changes (Figures 6F and S10; Table S6). The majority (112/132,
85%) of genes with promoter DNA methylation changes remained at low expression
levels (transcripts per million [TPM] < 10; Figure S10), matching previous
report that DNA methylation changes accumulate predominantly at inactive gene
promoters in long-term human cell cultures (Gordon et al., 2014). We used a model derived from long-term
fibroblast culture (Koch et al., 2012) to
predict the cumulative PDs (pcPDs) of the HFKs using DNA methylation levels at
certain CpGs, and found a good correlation between the predicted and actual PDs
(Figure 6G; Table S7). Overall, this suggested
that the majority of DNA methylation changes accompanied with EpiX expansion
were by-products of long-term culture and not responsible for gene expression
changes.
DISCUSSION
As cell behaviors are influenced by diverse external signals, we postulated
that screening small molecules could yield hits if we focused on desired outcome
(e.g., continuous cell proliferation) even without a priori
knowledge on the native stimuli. Through this approach, we found that TGF-β
signaling inhibition and ROCK inhibition synergistically supported epithelial cell
proliferation in the absence of feeder cells. TGF-β is a well-known
cytostatic factor (Siegel and Massagué,
2003), presumably through the activation of p21Cip1 and
p15INK4b (Bhowmick et al.,
2003; Denicourt and Dowdy, 2003).
Noteworthily, Rheinwald proposed that feeder cells protected epithelial cells from
TGF-β growth inhibition by efficiently degraded TGF-β (Rollins et al., 1989). Attenuation of TGF-β
signaling suppresses premature senescence in a p21Cip1-dependent manner
(Lin et al., 2012) or antagonizes
ATM-mediated growth-arrest response to genotoxic stress (Kirshner et al., 2006), and TGF-β inhibition
rescues hematopoietic stem cell defect (Zhang et
al., 2016). Nevertheless, inhibiting TGF-β signaling with small
molecule alone cannot immortalize epithelial cells, but can assist TERT in doing so
(Natarajan et al., 2006).Modest expressions of TGF-β were detected in epithelial cells
cultured in KSFM by ELISA and RNA-seq (Figures S3 and S6), suggesting that autocrine
TGF-β might contribute to cell growth arrest. Although RNA-seq detected
little change in TGF-β genes transcription in EpiX versus KSFM (Figure S6), ELISA showed that
A83-01 and Y-27632 together significantly reduced active TGF-β protein
produced by the epithelial cells, although either had little effect when used alone
(Figure S3). The
suppression on TGF-β protein may help explain the synergy between A83-01 and
Y-27632 on promoting cell proliferation, but how the TGF-β protein is reduced
in the absence of transcriptional changes warrants further investigation.Recently, the Rajagopal group reported that “dual SMAD”
inhibition enables long-term expansion of epithelial basal cells from airway, skin,
and epididymis (Mou et al., 2016), while they
also used Y-27632 and CHIR99021. They concluded that both TGF-β and BMP
pathways needed to be suppressed by A83-01 and DMH-1, respectively. DMH-1 was
included in our small-molecule collection but did not have a significant impact on
its own nor with either TGF-β or ROCK inhibitors, suggesting that BMP pathway
inhibition may not be critical at least under in vitro
condition.ROCKs influence a wide variety of signal pathways in eukaryotic cells and
play pivotal roles in regulating actin cytoskeleton, cell polarity, microtubule
dynamics, membrane transport pathways, and transcription factors activities (Etienne-Manneville and Hall, 2002). ROCK
inhibitor has been widely used in mammalian cell cultures presumably for its ability
to suppress anoikis (Watanabe et al., 2007).
What has not been highlighted before is the synergy between TGF-β signaling
inhibition and ROCK inhibition in promoting epithelial cell proliferation as we
delineated in this study. We also found that PAK1 inhibitor (IPA-3) or Myosin II
inhibitor (blebbistatin) had similar synergistic effect on promoting epithelial cell
proliferation when used with A83-01. The Watt laboratory proposed that Hippo
effector YAP nuclear translocation and its co-factor WBP2 as essential mediator to
promote cell proliferation and drive clonal expansion when cytoskeleton and
microtubule dynamics are pharmacologically modulated through the PAK1-ROCK-Myosin II
axis (Walko et al., 2017). We found that
Y-27632 but not A83-01 led to significant cytoskeleton reorganization and YAP
nuclear translocation in HFKs cultured in KSFM with 1.5 mM CaCl2 (Figure S3), which provided an
explanation for ROCK inhibitor as the primary hit in high-calcium F medium (Figures
1 and S1).High extracellular [Ca2+] induces epithelial cell differentiation
through promoting intercellular interaction (Martin
et al., 1991). When [Ca2+] is below 0.3 mM, NOTCH-1 is
constitutively active and allows cell-autonomous signaling in the absence of
reciprocal cell-cell interaction (Dalrymple et al.,
2005; Rand et al., 2000).
Interestingly, the low [Ca2+] in KSFM resulted in cytoskeletal
re-organization and YAP nuclear translocation similar to adding Y-27632 in the
presence of high [Ca2+] (Figure S3). Extracellular
Ca2+ also gates cadherin-cadherin homotypic interaction and
influences β-catenin nuclear trafficking and WNT target genes expression
(Nusse and Clevers, 2017). Such
miscellaneous effects of low extracellular [Ca2+] probably overshadow any
activity imparted by the GSK3 inhibitor CHIR99021, which showed little effect in the
EpiX medium.Importantly, our study revealed that EpiX-expanded epithelial cells
maintained remarkable genome integrity. The cells retained normal diploid and had
extremely low SNV rate comparable to germline cells (Rahbari et al., 2016). No mutations occur in oncogenes or tumor
suppressor genes. On the contrary, many PSC lines are reported to acquire genomic
variations including TP53 mutations with successive passages (Merkle et al., 2017). Current PSC differentiation
protocols produce epithelial progenitors that only propagate for a few passages in
convention medium (Firth et al., 2014; Umegaki-Arao et al., 2014). It is tempting to
use EpiX medium to expand PSC-derived epithelial progenitors, which could reduce the
production cost and assure the genomic quality of end cell products.Transcriptomic study of HFKs cultured in EpiX versus KSFM revealed
significant downregulation of genes involved in senescence, cell-cell interaction,
interferon signaling, extracellular matrix organization, and stress responses,
together with upregulation of genes involved in various metabolic processes and cell
cycle (Figure 2F). Importantly, the impact was
not permanent and reversed upon the withdrawal of EpiX medium (Figure 2E), allowing the cells to differentiate along
their tissue lineages. Genome-wide DNA methylation study revealed gradual
accumulation of DMRs that were mainly associated with successive passages. These
DMRs were weakly associated with gene expression change, and occurred mostly in the
promoters or enhancers of low-expression genes, confirming similar observation in
long-term culture of human cell lines (Gordon et
al., 2014). The DNA methylation changes were maintained after withdrawal
of EpiX medium (Figure
S10), suggesting that these DMRs were mainly driven by long-term in
vitro expansion.Cell proliferation eventually ground to a halt in the EpiX medium,
presumably due to telomeres erosion that lead to ATM/TP53-dependent DNA-damage
response (Lazzerini-Denchi and Sfeir, 2016).
Conversely, this might be a major contributor of the remarkable genome integrity due
to prompt elimination of the cells with DNA damages via apoptosis. The accumulation
of senescent cells in late-passage population is an important quality concern for
ex vivo cell manufacturing, as they may impair healthy
cells’ functions via destructive paracrine effect (Campisi, 2005; Rodieretal., 2009). Recent advances in the identification of senolytics
that can postpone senescence or eliminate senescent fibroblasts, such as rapamycin
(Iglesias-Bartolome et al., 2012), IL-1Ra
(Uekawa et al., 2004), ABT-263 (Chang et al., 2016), and FOXO4-DRI (Baar et al., 2017), might be useful to further
extend the expansion of epithelial cells.In summary, the EpiX medium supports over one trillion-fold expansion of
epithelial cells from diverse tissues in the absence of feeder cells. The EpiX
technology provides unique solutions to unleash the potential of tissue-resident
epithelial stem and progenitor cells for cell therapy and regenerative medicine.
STAR★METHODS
Detailed methods are provided in the online version of this paper and
include the following:
CONTACT FOR REAGENT AND RESOURCE SHARING
Further information and requests for resources and reagents should be
directed to and will be fulfilled by the Lead Contact, Chengkang Zhang
(ck.zhang@propagenix.com)
EXPERIMENTAL MODEL AND SUBJECT DETAILS
Primary epithelial cells were purchased from Lonza or ThermoFisher or
obtained from academic tissue bank (UNC CF Center). Fresh human foreskin tissue
was purchased from Zenbio for keratinocyte isolation. Fresh human nasal brushing
samples were collected from CF patients at UNC CF Clinic following approved IRB
protocol. The epithelial cells were cultured in the CR condition, commercial
media (Lonza BEGM, Lonza PrGM, Lonza MEGM, GIBCO KSFM), or the EpiX medium. The
EpiX medium was KSFM supplemented with 1 μM A83–01, 5 μM
Y-27632 and 3 μM isoproterenol. The epithelial cells were cultured in
collagen-coated vessels (Corning) until they reach 80%–90% confluence,
when they were passaged with Trypsin-EDTA and re-seeded into new vessels.For in vivo animal studies, female nude mice (6-8 weeks
old) were used and each group had 6 animals. Body weight and tumor measurements
were recorded twice weekly for 12 weeks. The study was conducted in compliance
with the IACUC protocols established at Noble Life Sciences.
METHOD DETAILS
Lentivirus transduction and live-imaging cell growth analysis with
IncuCyte
Epithelial cells cultured using the CR method were seeded into
24-well plate and cultured without feeder cells. The cells were transduced
with IncuCyte® NucLight Red (nRFP) Lentivirus Reagent (Essen
BioScience) and stable clones were established by puromycin selection.
Late-passage nRFP-expressing cells were seeded into collagen-coated 96-well
or 384-well plate (Corning). A collection of small molecules (Tocriscreen
Stem Cell Toolbox, Tocris; Table S1) were diluted in culture medium to the desired
concentrations and added to the culture. The cells were cultured in IncuCyte
ZOOM (Essen BioScience) for live-imaging analysis following the
manufacturer’s instructions for 5–7 days. Small molecules with
positive effects were purchased individually from Sigma-Aldrich or
Sellekchem for validation. Stocks of the chemicals were prepared by
dissolving in DMSO to 10 mM and added to culture media to desired final
concentrations.
Keratinocytes isolation and expansion
Fresh human skin purchased from ZenBio Inc. was cut into small
pieces and placed in Dispase solution (Corning) at 4C overnight. The next
day, the epidermis was separated from dermis with forceps and digested in
Trypsin-EDTA for 15 minutes. The cell suspension was filtered through a 40
μm strainer (BD Bioscience) and cultured in EpiX medium.
Cultured cell immunofluorescence
Cells cultured on collagen-coated CultureSlides (Corning) were fixed
in 4% PFA for 15 min at room temperature, washed 3 times in PBST (PBS+0.2%
Triton X-100) (5 min/wash) and incubated with the primary antibodies for 2
hours at room temperature or 4C overnight in PBS +1% normal goat serum.
Following incubation, the cells were rinsed 3 times in PBST and incubated
with secondary antibodies at room temperature for 1–2 hours. After
rinsing 3 times in PBST, the nuclei were stained with ProLong® Gold
with DAPI (ThermoFisher) and imaged with a fluorescence microscope (EVOS-FL,
ThermoFisher).
Telomere length measurement
Genomic DNA was extracted from the cells using the Quick-DNA
Miniprep Plus Kit (Zymo Research) and quantitated on a NanoDrop 2000.
Telomere length measurements by quantitative PCR was performed by the
Risques Lab at University of Washington.
Quantitative RT-PCR
Total RNA was isolated using the TRIzol Plus RNA Purification Kit
(ThermoFisher) and PureLink RNA Mini Kit (ThermoFisher). Total RNAs from
human lung, small intestine and mammary gland were purchased from Clontech
and used as control. RT2 Profiler PCR Array Human Cellular
Senescence (QIAGEN) was used to analyze the expression of genes involved in
cellular senescence using twenty nanogram total RNA for each reaction. The
primers (forward: 5′-TGACACCTCACCTCACCCAC-3′; reverse:
5′-CACTGTCTTCCGCAAGTTCAC-3′; Taqman probe:
5′-ACCCTGGTCCGAGGTGTCCCTGAG-3′) were used to determine
TERT expression with the TaqMan RNA-to-CT 1-Step Kit
(ThermoFisher), using one hundred nanogram total RNA per reaction.
Karyotype and Whole genome sequencing
Live cells were seeded in flasks and sent to Cell Line Genetics for
G-Band Karyotyping service. Genomic DNA was extracted from the cells using
the Quick-DNA Miniprep Plus Kit (Zymo Research) and quantitated on a
NanoDrop 2000. Whole genome library preparation and DNA sequencing on
Illumina HiSeq X and data analysis were performed by Novogene Inc.
Differentiation of HBEC at ALI
HBEC were seeded onto polyester Transwell membranes (Corning) at a
density of 400,000 cells/cm2 in EpiX+1.5 mM CaCl2.
After the cells reached confluence on the insert, the medium was replaced
with Pneumacult-ALI medium (STEMCELL Technologies) only in the lower chamber
to initiate air-liquid interface culture. The medium was changed every
2–3 days for 21–28 days until differentiation was well
established. Ciliogenesis was monitored by inverted-phase microscopy. The
membranes were fixed in 4% PFA at room temperature for 10 min, followed by
washing and permeabilization in PBST, for immunofluorescence staining.
Paraffin section, H&E and alcian blue staining were performed by
VitroVivo Biotech LLC.
Ion channels activity assays
Ussing assays were performed by ChanTest, a subsidiary of Charles
River Laboratories. Frozen cells were sent to ChanTest for plating and
differentiation at CRL using the Vertex (Neuberger et al., 2011) or Pneumacult-ALI medium. Short circuit
current (ISC) was evaluated after 32 and 36 days in ALI
culture.
Differentiation of keratinocytes at ALI and production of cultured
epidermal grafts
HFK were seeded onto polycarbonate Transwell membranes (Corning) at
a density of 400,000 cells/cm2 in EpiX+1.5 mM CaCl2.
After 2–3 days, the medium was removed from top chamber and only
added in the lower chamber to initiate ALI differentiation. The medium was
changed every 2–3 days for 14 days. To make cultured epidermal graft,
HFK were cultured in collage-coated T-75 flask in the EpiX medium until they
approached confluence, then the medium was switched to EpiX+1.5 mM
CaCl2 and cultured for another 7 days. The whole epidermal
sheet was released using Dispase solution at 37C for 30 min.
In vivo tumorigenicity and differentiation
HFK were expanded in EpiX or differentiated for 7 days in EpiX+1.5
mM CaCl2. The cells were harvested with Trypsin-EDTA and
resuspended in HBSS for in vivo tumorigenicity assays in
female nude mice, performed by Nobel Life Sciences as contract service in
compliance with established IACUC protocols. Briefly
1.0×107 cells were administered subcutaneously in a
volume of 0.1 mL in Matrigel on the flanks of 6–8 weeks old mice (n =
6 for each group). Following cell injection, body weight and tumor
measurements were recorded twice weekly for 12 weeks. Tissue samples were
harvested at specified time points and fixed in formalin for paraffin
sections.
RNA-Seq library preparation
Half million HFK per replicate were collected and stored at
−80°C in 1 mL of RNAlater solution until use. For late-passage
HFK cultured in KSFM (P5 and P20), 66,000-150,000 cells per replicate were
used as the cells quickly ceased expansion in KSFM. The mRNA was extracted
directly from the cells by using Dynabeads mRNA DIRECT Purification Kit
according to the manufacturer’s instructions. To avoid any genomic
DNA and rRNA contamination, eluted mRNA was treated with DNase (TURBO
DNA-free Kit) and bound again to the same Dynabeads used for the original
isolation, following the manufacturer’s instructions. RNA-Seq
libraries were generated using ScriptSeq RNA-Seq Library Preparation Kit
(Illumina) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
RNA-Seq data processing
RNA-Seq libraries were sequenced on the Illumina NextSeq 500
platform. The paired-end sequenced reads were aligned to the reference
genome hg19 and transcriptome (gencode v19) using STAR (Dobin et al., 2013) v.2.5.3a with the following
parameters:–outFilterType BySJout–outFilterMultimapNmax
20–outFilterMismatchNmax 999–outFilterMismatchNoverReadLmax
0.04–alignIntronMin 20–alignIntronMax
1000000–alignMatesGapMax 1000000–alignSJoverhangMin
8–alignSJDBoverhangMin 1. The total number of reads overlapping each
gene were counted using featureCounts (Liao
et al., 2014) (Subread v.1.5.3) with gencode v19 gtf file and the
following parameters: -O -s 1–primary -p. Transcripts per million
(TPM) were calculated from the read counts obtained from featureCounts.
Differential gene expression analysis
Differential gene expression was performed by using DESeq2
bioconductor package (Love et al.,
2014) v.1.14.1, following standard workflow suggested by the
package. The matrix of genes and read counts generated by featureCounts were
used as count matrix input. The dataset was pre-filtered by removing genes
with no or only one count across all samples. For PCA analysis and heatmap,
regularized-logarithm transformation (rlog) was performed for count data to
stabilize the variance across the mean. Differentially expressed genes were
identified by comparing two different media conditions, control KSFM (P2,
P4, P5, and P20) and EpiX (P3, P12, and P19). Only genes with
log2FC > 1 and adj.p <0.01 were considered
significant. The enrichment of gene ontology terms and pathways for DEGs was
analyzed by using Metascape (Tripathi et
al., 2015).
MeDIP-seq and MRE-seq library preparation
Half million HFK per replicate were collected and stored as a pellet
at −80°C until use. For late-passage HFK cultured in KSFM (P5
and P20), 66,000-150,000 cells per replicate were collected due to
difficulty of culture expansion. The genomic DNA was extracted by incubating
the cells in genomic DNA extraction buffer (50 mM Tris, 1 mM EDTA, 0.5% SDS,
1 mg/mL Proteinase K) followed by phenol-chloroform extraction. MeDIP-seq
and MRE-seq libraries were generated as described previously (Li et al., 2015; Maunakea et al., 2010), with minor modifications.
For MeDIP-seq, 100 ng of genomic DNA was sonicated to a fragment size of
100-500 bp, end processed and ligated to paired-end adapters. The DNA was
then denatured and immunoprecipitated using 100 ng of mouse monoclonal
anti-methylcytidine antibody in 400 μL of immunoprecipitation buffer
(10 μM sodium phosphate, pH 7.0, 140 mM NaCl and 0.05% Triton X-100)
overnight at 4°C. Antibody/DNA complexes were isolated by addition of
0.1 μL of rabbit anti-mouse IgG secondary antibody (2.0 mg/mL,
Jackson Immunoresearch) and 20 μL protein A/G agarose beads (Pierce
Biotechnology) for 2 h at 4°C. Beads were washed ten times with
immunoprecipitation buffer and then DNA was eluted in TE buffer with 0.25%
SDS and 0.25 mg/mL of proteinase K for 2 h at 50°C. DNA was then
purified with MinElute PCR Purification kit (QIAGEN). DNA was amplified by
17 cycles of PCR with the standard Illumina index primers and size selected
(150–500 bp) by Agencourt AMPure XP beads (Beckman Coulter). For
MRE-seq, five parallel digests (HpaII, Hin6I, SsiI, BstUI and HpyCH4IV; New
England Biolabs) were performed, each with 20 ng of genomic DNA. The
digested DNA was size selected using Agencourt AMPure XP beads (Beckman
Coulter), end processed and ligated to adapters. Then DNA was amplified by
18 cycles of PCR and size selected (150–500 bp) by Agencourt AMPure
XP beads (Beckman Coulter).
DNA methylome data processing
MeDIP-seq and MRE-seq libraries were sequenced on the Illumina
NextSeq 500 platform. The sequenced reads were adaptor-trimmed by using
cutadapt (Martin, 2011) v.1.9
paired-end mode with the parameters -q 10 -m 20. Trimmed reads were aligned
to the hg19 genome assembly using BWA-MEM (Li, 2013) v.0.7.10 with the default parameters. The aligned
MeDIP-seq reads were further processed using methylQA (Li et al., 2015) v.0.1.6 medip mode with the
default parameters. The aligned MRE-seq reads were processed using methylQA
(Li et al., 2015) v.0.1.6 mre
mode with the parameter -c 4. Methylation levels at single CpG resolution
were estimated by integrating MeDIP-seq and MRE-seq data using methylCRF
with default parameters as described previously (Stevens et al., 2013).
Identification of differentially methylated regions
Differentially methylated regions between two culture conditions
were identified by using methylMnM package (Zhang et al., 2013) with the default parameters. Briefly, the
coverage of MeDIP and MRE sequencing data and genomic CpG information were
calculated in each 500-bp genomic bin. The CpGs in the human blacklisted
genomic regions (ENCODE Project Consortium,
2012) and the mitochondrial genome were excluded from the
analysis. DMRs with a q-value (false discovery rate)
<1 × 10−5 were selected for each pairwise
comparison (Figure
S10A). Highly reproducible set of DMRs were identified by
intersecting all four pairwise comparisons between two different conditions
with two biological replicates and were used for further analysis (Figure 6B).
DNA Methylation analyses
Average DNA methylation level of each DMR was calculated by using
CpG methylation levels estimated by methylCRF. Principal component analysis
was performed on the average DNA methylation levels of all union set of
2,419 DMRs with high reproducibility. The chromatin states of each DMR was
determined by intersecting either core 15 chromHMM states or expanded 18
states of fetal keratinocytes (ID# 057 and 058) from Roadmap Epigenomics
Consortium data.
Prediction of cumulative population doublings
To predict cPDs, genomic coordinates of 6 CpG sites were determined
by using sequences surrounding the CpG sites. For cg03891191, two genomic
locations were found in hg19 genome assembly and average of methylCRF values
of two locations were used. Cumulative population doublings were calculated
by using the following equation (Koch and
Wagner, 2013): pcPD = 45.89 + (23.63 × cg02332525) +
(31.61 × cg17453778) + (−53.70 × cg03891191) + (14.86
× cg01459453) + (−23.94 × cg01999333) + (−10.34
× cg16431978).
QUANTIFICATION AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
IncuCyte Zoom was used for live imaging and automatic cell counts in
96-well or 384-well plates. Automatic cell count was facilitated by counting
nuclear-localized RFP. For multi-well plate assay, each condition had 3–4
replicates, and all error bars correspond to SD. GraphPad Prism 7.0 was used for
non-parametric tests. Unpaired data was compared using Kruskal-Wallis test.
Differences were considered significant if p < 0.05. All collected data
were included for the quantification and the statistical analysis.In the transcriptome study, regularized-logarithm transformation (rlog)
was performed for count data to stabilize the variance across the mean for PCA
analysis and heatmap. Differentially expressed genes were identified by
comparing two different media conditions, and only genes with log2FC
> 1 and adj.p < 0.01 were considered significant. In the DNA
methylation study, DMRs with a q-value (false discovery rate)
<1 × 10−5 were selected for each pairwise
comparison (Figure
S10A). Highly reproducible set of DMRs were identified by intersecting
all four pairwise comparisons between two different conditions with two
biological replicates and were used for further analysis (Figure 6B).
DATA AND SOFTWARE AVAILABILITY
The accession number for the data reported in this paper is Gene
Expression Omnibus (GEO): GSE103759, and contains the subseries GEO: GSE103756
(RNA-seq), GSE103757 (MeDIP-seq), and GSE103758 (MRE-seq). All data generated in
this study have been visualized in WashU Human Epigenome Browser (Zhou et al., 2011) and is publicly
available in the following url: http://epigenomegateway.wustl.edu/browser/?genome=hg19&datahub=http://wangftp.wustl.edu/~hlee/EpiX/EpiX_hg19.json.
NucLight Red Lentivirus (EF-1 Alpha Promoter,
Puromycin selection)
Essen Biosciences
Cat# 4476
Biological Samples
Human foreskin tissue, fresh
Zenbio
Cat# T-FS
Human nasal brushing samples from CF
patients
UNC CF Clinics
N/A
Chemicals, Peptides, and Recombinant
Proteins
Tocriscreen Stem Cell Toolbox
Tocris
Cat# 5060
A83-01
Sigma-Aldrich
Cat# SML0788
Y-27632 dihydrochloride
Enzo Life Sciences
Cat# ALX-270-333
Isoprenaline hydrochloride
Sigma-Aldrich
Cat# I5627-5G
(−)-Blebbistatin
Selleck Chemicals
Cat# S7099
IPA-3
Tocris
Cat# 3622
GSK-429286
Sigma-Aldrich
Cat# SML0231
Critical Commercial Assays
Telomere length measurements by
quantitative PCR service
Risques Lab at University of Washington
http://depts.washington.edu/risques/
G-Band Karyotyping service
Cell Line Genetics
N/A
Whole genome sequencing service
Novogene
N/A
Ussing assays service
ChanTest, a subsidiary of Charles River
Laboratories
N/A
Histology service (Paraffin section, H&E
and alcian blue staining)
VitroVivo Biotech LLC
N/A
TGF-β ELISA service
University of Maryland Cytokine Core Lab
N/A
RT2 Profiler PCR Array Human
Cellular Senescence
QIAGEN
Cat# PAHS-050ZA-6
In vivo tumorigenicity
service
Noble Life Sciences
N/A
Deposited Data
Raw and analyzed RNA-seq, MeDIP-seq and
MRE-seq data
This paper
GSE103759 containing the Subseries GSE103756
(RNA-seq), GSE103757 (MeDIP-seq) and GSE103758 (MRE-seq)
Analyzed whole genome sequencing data
This paper
Figure 3;
Table
S4
Experimental Models: Cell Lines
Human bronchial epithelial cells, P1, from
healthy and CF donors
UNC CF Center Tissue Procurement and
Cell Culture Core
N/A
NHBE-Bronchial Epi Cells for B-ALI
Lonza
Cat# CC-2540S
CF-DHBE - Diseased Bronchial Epi. Cells
(CF)
Lonza
Cat# 196979
Human Epidermal Keratinocytes, adult
(HEKa)
Thermo Fisher Scientific
Cat# C0055C
Human Epidermal Keratinocytes, neonatal
(HEKn)
Thermo Fisher Scientific
Cat# C0015C
HMEC-Human Mammary Epithelial Cells
Lonza
Cat# CC-2551
LNCap Clone FGC Cell Line human
Sigma-Aldrich
Cat# D-073-1ML
Human normal prostate epithelial cells
Georgetown University
N/A
Experimental Models: Organisms/Strains
Nude mice (Noble Life Sciences)
Jackson Lab
N/A
NSG mice (Noble Life Sciences)
Jackson Lab
N/A
Oligonucleotides
qRT-PCR primers for TERT (forward primer,
5′-TGACACCTCACCTCACCCAC-3′, reverse primer,
5′-CACTGTCTTCCGCAAGTTCAC-3′ and Taqman probe
(5′-ACCCTGGTCCGAGGTGTCCCTGAG-3′)
Authors: Haojian Zhang; David E Kozono; Kevin W O'Connor; Sofia Vidal-Cardenas; Alix Rousseau; Abigail Hamilton; Lisa Moreau; Emily F Gaudiano; Joel Greenberger; Grover Bagby; Jean Soulier; Markus Grompe; Kalindi Parmar; Alan D D'Andrea Journal: Cell Stem Cell Date: 2016-03-24 Impact factor: 24.633
Authors: Bo Zhang; Yan Zhou; Nan Lin; Rebecca F Lowdon; Chibo Hong; Raman P Nagarajan; Jeffrey B Cheng; Daofeng Li; Michael Stevens; Hyung Joo Lee; Xiaoyun Xing; Jia Zhou; Vasavi Sundaram; Ginell Elliott; Junchen Gu; Taoping Shi; Philippe Gascard; Mahvash Sigaroudinia; Thea D Tlsty; Theresa Kadlecek; Arthur Weiss; Henriette O'Geen; Peggy J Farnham; Cécile L Maire; Keith L Ligon; Pamela A F Madden; Angela Tam; Richard Moore; Martin Hirst; Marco A Marra; Baoxue Zhang; Joseph F Costello; Ting Wang Journal: Genome Res Date: 2013-06-26 Impact factor: 9.043
Authors: Colin R Butler; Robert E Hynds; Kate H C Gowers; Dani Do Hyang Lee; James M Brown; Claire Crowley; Vitor H Teixeira; Claire M Smith; Luca Urbani; Nicholas J Hamilton; Ricky M Thakrar; Helen L Booth; Martin A Birchall; Paolo De Coppi; Adam Giangreco; Christopher O'Callaghan; Sam M Janes Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2016-07-15 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Anshul Kundaje; Wouter Meuleman; Jason Ernst; Misha Bilenky; Angela Yen; Alireza Heravi-Moussavi; Pouya Kheradpour; Zhizhuo Zhang; Jianrong Wang; Michael J Ziller; Viren Amin; John W Whitaker; Matthew D Schultz; Lucas D Ward; Abhishek Sarkar; Gerald Quon; Richard S Sandstrom; Matthew L Eaton; Yi-Chieh Wu; Andreas R Pfenning; Xinchen Wang; Melina Claussnitzer; Yaping Liu; Cristian Coarfa; R Alan Harris; Noam Shoresh; Charles B Epstein; Elizabeta Gjoneska; Danny Leung; Wei Xie; R David Hawkins; Ryan Lister; Chibo Hong; Philippe Gascard; Andrew J Mungall; Richard Moore; Eric Chuah; Angela Tam; Theresa K Canfield; R Scott Hansen; Rajinder Kaul; Peter J Sabo; Mukul S Bansal; Annaick Carles; Jesse R Dixon; Kai-How Farh; Soheil Feizi; Rosa Karlic; Ah-Ram Kim; Ashwinikumar Kulkarni; Daofeng Li; Rebecca Lowdon; GiNell Elliott; Tim R Mercer; Shane J Neph; Vitor Onuchic; Paz Polak; Nisha Rajagopal; Pradipta Ray; Richard C Sallari; Kyle T Siebenthall; Nicholas A Sinnott-Armstrong; Michael Stevens; Robert E Thurman; Jie Wu; Bo Zhang; Xin Zhou; Arthur E Beaudet; Laurie A Boyer; Philip L De Jager; Peggy J Farnham; Susan J Fisher; David Haussler; Steven J M Jones; Wei Li; Marco A Marra; Michael T McManus; Shamil Sunyaev; James A Thomson; Thea D Tlsty; Li-Huei Tsai; Wei Wang; Robert A Waterland; Michael Q Zhang; Lisa H Chadwick; Bradley E Bernstein; Joseph F Costello; Joseph R Ecker; Martin Hirst; Alexander Meissner; Aleksandar Milosavljevic; Bing Ren; John A Stamatoyannopoulos; Ting Wang; Manolis Kellis Journal: Nature Date: 2015-02-19 Impact factor: 69.504
Authors: Michael D Prater; Valérie Petit; I Alasdair Russell; Rajshekhar R Giraddi; Mona Shehata; Suraj Menon; Reiner Schulte; Ivo Kalajzic; Nicola Rath; Michael F Olson; Daniel Metzger; Marisa M Faraldo; Marie-Ange Deugnier; Marina A Glukhova; John Stingl Journal: Nat Cell Biol Date: 2014-08-31 Impact factor: 28.824
Authors: Malachia Hoover; Farhana Runa; Evan Booker; Jolene K Diedrich; Erika Duell; Blake Williams; Caroline Arellano-Garcia; Toni Uhlendorf; Sa La Kim; Wolfgang Fischer; James Moresco; Peter C Gray; Jonathan A Kelber Journal: Biochem Biophys Res Commun Date: 2018-12-20 Impact factor: 3.575
Authors: Rhianna E Lee; Sean M Miller; Teresa M Mascenik; Catherine A Lewis; Hong Dang; Zachary H Boggs; Robert Tarran; Scott H Randell Journal: Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol Date: 2020-09 Impact factor: 6.914
Authors: Maria Kalli; Ruxuan Li; Gordon B Mills; Triantafyllos Stylianopoulos; Ioannis K Zervantonakis Journal: Mol Cancer Res Date: 2022-03-01 Impact factor: 5.852
Authors: Nick J I Hamilton; Robert E Hynds; Kate H C Gowers; Angela Tait; Colin R Butler; Colin Hopper; Alan J Burns; Martin A Birchall; Mark Lowdell; Sam M Janes Journal: Tissue Eng Part C Methods Date: 2019-02 Impact factor: 3.056
Authors: Allison M Greaney; Taylor S Adams; Micha Sam Brickman Raredon; Elise Gubbins; Jonas C Schupp; Alexander J Engler; Mahboobe Ghaedi; Yifan Yuan; Naftali Kaminski; Laura E Niklason Journal: Cell Rep Date: 2020-03-24 Impact factor: 9.423