Literature DB >> 30332596

Opportunities for augmentation cystoplasty revision without additional bowel harvest: "Hourglass" deformity or non-detubularized augment.

Joseph J Pariser1, Sean P Elliott1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: We describe our experience performing bladder augmentation revision without additional bowel harvest for certain suboptimal cystoplasty configurations.
METHODS: We identified patients with prior bladder augmentation who underwent augmentation revision without additional bowel harvest at our institution. These patients were identified to have either "hourglass" deformity or non-detubularized augment previously. Revision was performed using an open technique by detaching the prior augment and performing detubularization and/or completion cystotomy as needed. Baseline characteristics, perioperative courses, and followup information were reviewed. Preand postoperative cystography and urodynamics were assessed.
RESULTS: Seven patients underwent bladder augmentation revision without the use of additional bowel. Three patients were found to have a non-detubularized augment, while the other four had a narrow connection from the native bladder to augment. Cystography demonstrated correction of "hourglass" deformity for the four patients, and urodynamics revealed resolution of phasic contractions after detubularization. Six of seven patients reported significant improvements in symptoms, such as frequency, urgency, and incontinence. One patient ultimately required Indiana pouch urinary diversion. All patients are performing intermittent catheterization at last followup.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with a prior bladder augmentation with inadequate urine storage should have testing to identify the possibility of a non-detubularized augment or "hourglass" deformity. These patients can be safely offered a revision without the need for additional bowel harvest.

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID: 30332596      PMCID: PMC6520056          DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.5548

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J        ISSN: 1911-6470            Impact factor:   1.862


  16 in total

1.  [The "little bladder" of genito-urinary tuberculosis; classification, site and variants of bladder-intestine transplants].

Authors:  R COUVELAIRE
Journal:  J Urol Medicale Chir       Date:  1950

Review 2.  Gastrocystoplasty: long-term complications in 22 patients.

Authors:  G C Mingin; J A Stock; M K Hanna
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 3.  Bladder augmentation and urinary diversion in patients with neurogenic bladder: surgical considerations.

Authors:  Raimund Stein; Annette Schröder; Joachim W Thüroff
Journal:  J Pediatr Urol       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 1.830

4.  The Recommendations of the 2015 American Urological Association Working Group on Genitourinary Congenitalism.

Authors:  Jairam R Eswara; Stephanie Kielb; Martin A Koyle; Dan Wood; Hadley M Wood
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 2.649

5.  A therapeutic method for failed bladder augmentation in children: re-augmentation.

Authors:  Peter Vajda; Cenk S N Buyukunal; Yunus Soylet; Nur Danismed; Zsolt Juhasz; Andrew B Pinter
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 5.588

6.  Successful treatment with botulinum toxin A after failed augmentation ileocystoplasty.

Authors:  Apostolos Apostolidis; Roshni Popat; Matthew Harper; Clare J Fowler; Prokar Dasgupta
Journal:  Nat Clin Pract Urol       Date:  2007-05

7.  Determinants of success and failure of seromuscular colocystoplasty lined with urothelium.

Authors:  Ricardo González; Barbara Ludwikowski; Maya Horst
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2009-08-19       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Spontaneous bladder perforations: a report of 500 augmentations in children and analysis of risk.

Authors:  P D Metcalfe; A J Casale; M A Kaefer; R Misseri; A M Dussinger; K K Meldrum; M P Cain; R C Rink
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Bladder autoaugmentation: early clinical experience.

Authors:  P C Cartwright; B W Snow
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Hourglass bladder after ileocystoplasty (case report).

Authors:  Hamdan H Alhazmi
Journal:  Ann Saudi Med       Date:  2015 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.526

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.