Literature DB >> 10458445

Gastrocystoplasty: long-term complications in 22 patients.

G C Mingin1, J A Stock, M K Hanna.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Gastrocystoplasty has been performed as an alternative to enterocystoplasty to increase bladder capacity and/or compliance while avoiding the complications associated with the use of bowel segments. Gastrocystoplasty is not without metabolic and physiological complications, such as the dysuria-hematuria syndrome and hypochloremic metabolic alkalosis. Currently to our knowledge there is limited long-term followup of gastrocystoplasty, which prompted us to review our experience with gastrocystoplasty and compare our findings with those of others.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed for complications the records of 12 boys and 10 girls 8 to 24 years old who underwent gastrocystoplasty. Followup ranged from 48 to 96 months. The diagnosis included neurogenic bladder in 12 cases, posterior urethral valves in 6, bladder exstrophy in 3 and pelvic tumor in 1. All patients underwent preoperative evaluation of serum electrolytes, blood urea nitrogen and creatinine as well as a radionuclide renal scan. Urodynamics were done preoperatively in all patients and postoperatively for complications. A gastric wedge with the pedicle based on the right gastroepiploic artery was removed, leaving the lesser curvature and vagus nerve intact. This technique was used in 21 of the 22 cases, including 1 case after initial surgery elsewhere. Ureteroneocystotomy, Mitrofanoff appendicovesicostomy and bladder neck reconstruction were performed as indicated.
RESULTS: There was 1 early complication (postoperative bleeding) and the remainder were late complications, including vesicoureteral reflux in 4 cases, Mitrofanoff valve stenosis in 3, the hematuria-dysuria syndrome, renal calculi, decreased bladder capacity with incontinence and metabolic alkalosis in 2 each, and ureterovesical stricture in 1. The late complication rate in our series was 36%.
CONCLUSIONS: Our long-term results differ from those of others in the number of late complications (36 versus 21.8%). In addition, 50% of our patients with complications had multiple complications. These findings may be due to a longer followup. Nevertheless, our data cast serious doubt on the long-term advantages of using stomach for bladder augmentation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10458445

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  10 in total

Review 1.  Bladder augmentation: complications in the pediatric population.

Authors:  Peter D Metcalfe; Richard C Rink
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 2.  Bladder exstrophy: current management and postoperative imaging.

Authors:  Ketsia Pierre; Joseph Borer; Andrew Phelps; Jeanne S Chow
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2014-06-18

3.  Adenocarcinoma arising in a gastrocystoplasty.

Authors:  B Balachandra; P E Swanson; M P Upton; M M Yeh
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  [Urinary bladder augmentation using the stomach in patients with compensated renal insufficiency].

Authors:  V Zugor; M Schreiber; P Klein; G E Schott
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 0.639

5.  Adenocarcinoma arising from tubulovillous adenoma in a native bladder following gastrocystoplasty.

Authors:  Ting-Po Lin; Marcelo Chen; Jong-Ming Hsu; J C Sheu
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 1.827

6.  Opportunities for augmentation cystoplasty revision without additional bowel harvest: "Hourglass" deformity or non-detubularized augment.

Authors:  Joseph J Pariser; Sean P Elliott
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 1.862

7.  Urinary bladder reconstruction using autologous collagenous connective tissue membrane "Biosheet®" induced by in-body tissue architecture: A pilot study.

Authors:  Yasumasa Iimori; Ryosuke Iwai; Kengo Nagatani; Yuka Inoue; Marina Funayama-Iwai; Mari Okamoto; Mio Nakata; Keiichiro Mie; Hidetaka Nishida; Yasuhide Nakayama; Hideo Akiyoshi
Journal:  Regen Ther       Date:  2020-11-20       Impact factor: 3.419

8.  Bladder augmentation: Review of the literature and recent advances.

Authors:  Serhat Gurocak; Jody Nuininga; Iyimser Ure; Robert P E De Gier; Mustafa Ozgur Tan; Wouter Feitz
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2007-10

9.  Bladder augmentation and continent urinary diversion in boys with posterior urethral valves.

Authors:  Małgorzata Baka-Ostrowska
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2011-12-09

10.  Effect of gastrocystoplasty on height and bone density in children.

Authors:  Amit Singh; G Moorthy; Minu Bajpai
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2018 Jul-Sep
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.