Alexandra Azevedo1, Andreia Bettencourt2, Manuela Selores3, Tiago Torres3. 1. Serviço de Dermatologia: Centro Hospitalar do Porto. Porto, Portugal. 2. Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas Abel Salazar. Universidade do Porto. Porto. Portugal. 3. Serviço de Dermatologia: Centro Hospitalar do Porto. Porto. Portugal; Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas Abel Salazar. Universidade do Porto. Porto. Portugal.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Biosimilars are highly similar copies of previously approved original biologic medicines. Their introduction on the market may yield cost reduction. The aim of this study was to evaluate the perspectives of psoriasis patients on biosimilar medications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a 14 questions survey of psoriasis patients receiving biological therapy and followed-up in a dermatology department of a Portuguese tertiary care hospital. RESULTS: From a total of 108 patients included, 70.4% of patients did not know the definition of biosimilar agent and 76.6% of patients showed partial or total interest in using a biosimilar drug. Nearly 80% of patients partially or totally agreed in using a biosimilar drug in order to reduce healthcare costs with psoriasis treatment. However, the lack of studies in the European population and in psoriatic patients led most of the patients (72.2% and 75.0%, respectively) to somewhat or completely oppose to the use of biosimilars. Demographic variables, household income and type of current biologic therapy did not affect patient preferences. DISCUSSION: Despite of the unfamiliarity of the respondents with biosimilars, most patients seem receptive to their use. Nevertheless, there are two issues of concern: i) the use of biosimilars that are not tested in a European population, and ii) its approval for psoriasis without trials in this disease. Thus, an immediate need exists for patient education about biosimilars. CONCLUSION: Biosimilars may increase patient access to biologic therapies. Improved communication and the involvement of patients in decision-making regarding biosimilars may increase their acceptance in future.
INTRODUCTION: Biosimilars are highly similar copies of previously approved original biologic medicines. Their introduction on the market may yield cost reduction. The aim of this study was to evaluate the perspectives of psoriasispatients on biosimilar medications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a 14 questions survey of psoriasispatients receiving biological therapy and followed-up in a dermatology department of a Portuguese tertiary care hospital. RESULTS: From a total of 108 patients included, 70.4% of patients did not know the definition of biosimilar agent and 76.6% of patients showed partial or total interest in using a biosimilar drug. Nearly 80% of patients partially or totally agreed in using a biosimilar drug in order to reduce healthcare costs with psoriasis treatment. However, the lack of studies in the European population and in psoriaticpatients led most of the patients (72.2% and 75.0%, respectively) to somewhat or completely oppose to the use of biosimilars. Demographic variables, household income and type of current biologic therapy did not affect patient preferences. DISCUSSION: Despite of the unfamiliarity of the respondents with biosimilars, most patients seem receptive to their use. Nevertheless, there are two issues of concern: i) the use of biosimilars that are not tested in a European population, and ii) its approval for psoriasis without trials in this disease. Thus, an immediate need exists for patient education about biosimilars. CONCLUSION: Biosimilars may increase patient access to biologic therapies. Improved communication and the involvement of patients in decision-making regarding biosimilars may increase their acceptance in future.
Authors: Adriano Friganović; Wioletta Mędrzycka-Dąbrowska; Sabina Krupa; Ber Oomen; Nico Decock; Alessandro Stievano Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-08-19 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Yannick Vandenplas; Liese Barbier; Steven Simoens; Philippe Van Wilder; Arnold G Vulto; Isabelle Huys Journal: Front Pharmacol Date: 2022-01-05 Impact factor: 5.810