Alberto Pilotto1, Nicola Veronese1, Julia Daragjati2, Alfonso J Cruz-Jentoft3, Maria Cristina Polidori4, Francesco Mattace-Raso5, Marc Paccalin6,7, Eva Topinkova8, Giacomo Siri1, Antonio Greco9, Arduino A Mangoni10, Stefania Maggi11, Luigi Ferrucci12. 1. Department of Geriatric Care, Orthogeriatrics and Rehabilitation, E.O. Galliera Hospital, National Relevance and High Specialization Hospital, Genoa, Italy. 2. Geriatrics Unit, San Antonio Hospital, Padua, Italy. 3. Servicio de Geriatría, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal (IRYCIS), Madrid, Spain. 4. Department of Medicine II, University of Cologne Medical Faculty, Germany. 5. Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Geriatric Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. 6. Geriatrics Department, Poitiers University Hospital, France. 7. Centre Investigation Clinique 1402, University of Poitiers, France. 8. Department of Geriatrics, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, Czech Republic. 9. Geriatrics Unit, IRCCS CSS, San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy. 10. Department of Clinical Pharmacology, School of Medicine, Flinders University and Flinders Medical Centre, Adelaide, Australia. 11. Aging Section, National Research Council, Padova, Italy. 12. National Institute on Aging, Baltimore, Maryland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Multidimensional Prognostic Index (MPI) is useful as a prognostic tool in hospitalized older patients, but our knowledge is derived from retrospective studies. We therefore aimed to evaluate in a multicenter, longitudinal, cohort study whether the MPI at hospital admission is useful to identify groups with different mortality risk and whether MPI at discharge may predict institutionalization, rehospitalization, and use of home care services during 12 months. METHODS: This longitudinal study, carried out between February 2015 and August 2017, included nine public hospitals in Europe and Australia. A standardized comprehensive geriatric assessment including information on functional, nutritional, cognitive status, risk of pressure sores, comorbidities, medications, and cohabitation status was used to calculate the MPI and to categorize participants in low, moderate, and severe risk of mortality. Data regarding mortality, institutionalization, rehospitalization, and use of home care services were recorded through administrative information. RESULTS: Altogether, 1,140 hospitalized patients (mean age 84.1 years, women = 60.8%) were included. In the multivariable analysis, compared to patients with low risk group at admission, patients in moderate (odds ratio [OR] = 3.32; 95% CI: 1.79-6.17; p < .001) and severe risk (OR = 10.72, 95% CI: 5.70-20.18, p < .0001) groups were at higher risk of overall mortality. Among the 984 older patients with follow-up data available, those in the severe-risk group experienced a higher risk of overall mortality, institutionalization, rehospitalization, and access to home care services. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort of hospitalized older adults, higher MPI values are associated with higher mortality and other negative outcomes. Multidimensional assessment of older people admitted to hospital may facilitate appropriate clinical and postdischarge management.
BACKGROUND: Multidimensional Prognostic Index (MPI) is useful as a prognostic tool in hospitalized older patients, but our knowledge is derived from retrospective studies. We therefore aimed to evaluate in a multicenter, longitudinal, cohort study whether the MPI at hospital admission is useful to identify groups with different mortality risk and whether MPI at discharge may predict institutionalization, rehospitalization, and use of home care services during 12 months. METHODS: This longitudinal study, carried out between February 2015 and August 2017, included nine public hospitals in Europe and Australia. A standardized comprehensive geriatric assessment including information on functional, nutritional, cognitive status, risk of pressure sores, comorbidities, medications, and cohabitation status was used to calculate the MPI and to categorize participants in low, moderate, and severe risk of mortality. Data regarding mortality, institutionalization, rehospitalization, and use of home care services were recorded through administrative information. RESULTS: Altogether, 1,140 hospitalized patients (mean age 84.1 years, women = 60.8%) were included. In the multivariable analysis, compared to patients with low risk group at admission, patients in moderate (odds ratio [OR] = 3.32; 95% CI: 1.79-6.17; p < .001) and severe risk (OR = 10.72, 95% CI: 5.70-20.18, p < .0001) groups were at higher risk of overall mortality. Among the 984 older patients with follow-up data available, those in the severe-risk group experienced a higher risk of overall mortality, institutionalization, rehospitalization, and access to home care services. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort of hospitalized older adults, higher MPI values are associated with higher mortality and other negative outcomes. Multidimensional assessment of older people admitted to hospital may facilitate appropriate clinical and postdischarge management.
Authors: Alberto Pilotto; Alberto Cella; Andrea Pilotto; Julia Daragjati; Nicola Veronese; Clarissa Musacchio; Anna Maria Mello; Giancarlo Logroscino; Alessandro Padovani; Camilla Prete; Francesco Panza Journal: J Am Med Dir Assoc Date: 2016-12-31 Impact factor: 4.669
Authors: Rachel A Freedman; Nancy L Keating; Lydia E Pace; Joyce Lii; Ellen P McCarthy; Mara A Schonberg Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2017-07-27 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Nicolas Mottet; Joaquim Bellmunt; Michel Bolla; Erik Briers; Marcus G Cumberbatch; Maria De Santis; Nicola Fossati; Tobias Gross; Ann M Henry; Steven Joniau; Thomas B Lam; Malcolm D Mason; Vsevolod B Matveev; Paul C Moldovan; Roderick C N van den Bergh; Thomas Van den Broeck; Henk G van der Poel; Theo H van der Kwast; Olivier Rouvière; Ivo G Schoots; Thomas Wiegel; Philip Cornford Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2016-08-25 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Alberto Pilotto; Franco Rengo; Niccolò Marchionni; Daniele Sancarlo; Andrea Fontana; Francesco Panza; Luigi Ferrucci Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-01-11 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Nicola Veronese; Giacomo Siri; Alberto Cella; Julia Daragjati; Alfonso J Cruz-Jentoft; Maria Cristina Polidori; Francesco Mattace-Raso; Marc Paccalin; Eva Topinkova; Antonio Greco; Arduino A Mangoni; Stefania Maggi; Luigi Ferrucci; Alberto Pilotto Journal: Maturitas Date: 2019-08-03 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Alberto Pilotto; Carlo Custodero; Stefania Maggi; Maria Cristina Polidori; Nicola Veronese; Luigi Ferrucci Journal: Ageing Res Rev Date: 2020-03-21 Impact factor: 10.895
Authors: Nicola Veronese; Giacomo Siri; Alberto Cella; Stefania Maggi; Ekaterini Zigoura; Matteo Puntoni; Lee Smith; Clarissa Musacchio; Antonella Barone; Carlo Sabbà; Francesco Vallone; Alberto Pilotto Journal: J Am Med Dir Assoc Date: 2019-11-25 Impact factor: 4.669
Authors: Siok Swan Tan; Marta M Pisano; An Ld Boone; Graham Baker; Yves-Marie Pers; Alberto Pilotto; Verushka Valsecchi; Sabrina Zora; Xuxi Zhang; Irene Fierloos; Hein Raat Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-05-28 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Martijn S van Mourik; Nathalie van der Velde; Giulio Mannarino; Marie-Pierre Thibodeau; Jean-Bernard Masson; Gennaro Santoro; Jan Baan; Sofie Jansen; Jana Kurucova; Martin Thoenes; Cornelia Deutsch; Andreas W Schoenenberger; Andrea Ungar; Peter Bramlage; M Marije Vis Journal: J Geriatr Cardiol Date: 2019-06 Impact factor: 3.327
Authors: Ajay T Bakas; Aniel Sewnaik; Jaclyn van Straaten; Robert J Baatenburg de Jong; Francesco U S Mattace-Raso; Harmke A Polinder-Bos Journal: Clin Interv Aging Date: 2021-09-16 Impact factor: 4.458