| Literature DB >> 28049616 |
Alberto Pilotto1, Alberto Cella2, Andrea Pilotto3, Julia Daragjati4, Nicola Veronese5, Clarissa Musacchio2, Anna Maria Mello2, Giancarlo Logroscino6, Alessandro Padovani3, Camilla Prete2, Francesco Panza7.
Abstract
Comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) is a multidisciplinary diagnostic and treatment process that identifies medical, psychosocial, and functional capabilities of older adults to develop a coordinated plan to maximize overall health with aging. Specific criteria used by CGA programs to evaluate patients include age, medical comorbidities, psychosocial problems, previous or predicted high healthcare utilization, change in living situation, and specific geriatric conditions. However, no universal criteria have been agreed upon to readily identify patients who are likely to benefit from CGA. Evidence from randomized controlled trials and large systematic reviews and meta-analyses suggested that the healthcare setting may modify the effectiveness of CGA programs. Home CGA programs and CGA performed in the hospital were shown to be consistently beneficial for several health outcomes. In contrast, the data are conflicting for posthospital discharge CGA programs, outpatient CGA consultation, and CGA-based inpatient geriatric consultation services. The effectiveness of CGA programs may be modified also by particular settings or specific clinical conditions, with tailored CGA programs in older frail patients evaluated for preoperative assessment, admitted or discharged from emergency departments and orthogeriatric units or with cancer and cognitive impairment. CGA is capable of effectively exploring multiple domains in older age, being the multidimensional and multidisciplinary tool of choice to determine the clinical profile, the pathologic risk and the residual skills as well as the short- and long-term prognosis to facilitate the clinical decision making on the personalized care plan of older persons.Entities:
Keywords: Frailty; cancer; cognitive impairment; emergency medicine; geriatrics; orthopedics
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 28049616 DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2016.11.004
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Am Med Dir Assoc ISSN: 1525-8610 Impact factor: 4.669