An Sermon1,2, Ine Rochus1, Bart Smeets3, Willem-Jan Metsemakers1,2, Dominique Misselyn1,2, Stefaan Nijs1,2, Harm Hoekstra4,5. 1. Department of Trauma Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium. 2. Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, University of Leuven, 3000, Leuven, Belgium. 3. University Hospitals Leuven, Management Information and Reporting, 3000, Leuven, Belgium. 4. Department of Trauma Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium. harm.hoekstra@uzleuven.be. 5. Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, University of Leuven, 3000, Leuven, Belgium. harm.hoekstra@uzleuven.be.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Timing of surgery in geriatric hip fracture treatment remains controversial. Early surgery is acknowledged as a quality indicator and NICE guidelines recommend surgery within 0-48 h from admission. In 2014 we implemented the indicator of early surgery in our institution, enhancing operative treatment within the next calendar day. We aimed to evaluate the implementation, define the room for improvement and provide strategies to maintain the quality indicator. METHODS: Clinical outcome of 744 patients (January 2011-December 2013) before early surgery was implemented, compared to 817 patients (June 2014-May 2017) after implementation of early surgery with a follow-up of 6 months. Data-analysis was done by Pearson's Chi-square test and Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS: Early surgery was achieved in 47.6% and 85.7% in the preimplementation and postimplementation group, respectively (P < 0.001). Both 30 days and 6 months mortality were similar (6.0% vs. 5.4%, P = 0.573 and 18.7% vs. 16.9%, P = 0.355, preimplementation vs. postimplementation, respectively). Early surgery resulted in a significantly shorter total length-of-stay (14 vs. 12 days, P < 0.001, preimplementation vs. postimplementation, respectively). Early surgery did not reduce the readmission rate. CONCLUSIONS: The indicator of early surgery has been successfully implemented. Early surgery resulted in a significantly shorter LOS. No significant reduction in 30 days and 6 months mortality, and 90 days readmission was observed. To maintain early surgery, continuous engagement and monitoring is required by all shareholders involved and if necessary, adjustment of the clinical route is appropriate.
BACKGROUND: Timing of surgery in geriatric hip fracture treatment remains controversial. Early surgery is acknowledged as a quality indicator and NICE guidelines recommend surgery within 0-48 h from admission. In 2014 we implemented the indicator of early surgery in our institution, enhancing operative treatment within the next calendar day. We aimed to evaluate the implementation, define the room for improvement and provide strategies to maintain the quality indicator. METHODS: Clinical outcome of 744 patients (January 2011-December 2013) before early surgery was implemented, compared to 817 patients (June 2014-May 2017) after implementation of early surgery with a follow-up of 6 months. Data-analysis was done by Pearson's Chi-square test and Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS: Early surgery was achieved in 47.6% and 85.7% in the preimplementation and postimplementation group, respectively (P < 0.001). Both 30 days and 6 months mortality were similar (6.0% vs. 5.4%, P = 0.573 and 18.7% vs. 16.9%, P = 0.355, preimplementation vs. postimplementation, respectively). Early surgery resulted in a significantly shorter total length-of-stay (14 vs. 12 days, P < 0.001, preimplementation vs. postimplementation, respectively). Early surgery did not reduce the readmission rate. CONCLUSIONS: The indicator of early surgery has been successfully implemented. Early surgery resulted in a significantly shorter LOS. No significant reduction in 30 days and 6 months mortality, and 90 days readmission was observed. To maintain early surgery, continuous engagement and monitoring is required by all shareholders involved and if necessary, adjustment of the clinical route is appropriate.
Entities:
Keywords:
Early surgery; Geriatric hip fracture; Quality indicator
Authors: Leonie B Oldmeadow; Elton R Edwards; Lara A Kimmel; Eva Kipen; Val J Robertson; Michael J Bailey Journal: ANZ J Surg Date: 2006-07 Impact factor: 1.872
Authors: María T Vidán; Elisabet Sánchez; Yassira Gracia; Eugenio Marañón; Javier Vaquero; José A Serra Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2011-08-16 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Julián Librero; Salvador Peiró; Edith Leutscher; Juan Merlo; Enrique Bernal-Delgado; Manuel Ridao; Natalia Martínez-Lizaga; Gabriel Sanfélix-Gimeno Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2012-01-18 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Gretchen M Orosz; Jay Magaziner; Edward L Hannan; R Sean Morrison; Kenneth Koval; Marvin Gilbert; Maryann McLaughlin; Ethan A Halm; Jason J Wang; Ann Litke; Stacey B Silberzweig; Albert L Siu Journal: JAMA Date: 2004-04-14 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Pariswi Tewari; Brian F Sweeney; Jacie L Lemos; Lauren Shapiro; Michael J Gardner; Arden M Morris; Laurence C Baker; Alex S Harris; Robin N Kamal Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2022-09-01