Importance: The clinical implications of adding plasma-based circulating tumor DNA next-generation sequencing (NGS) to tissue NGS for targetable mutation detection in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have not been formally assessed. Objective: To determine whether plasma NGS testing was associated with improved mutation detection and enhanced delivery of personalized therapy in a real-world clinical setting. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective cohort study enrolled 323 patients with metastatic NSCLC who had plasma testing ordered as part of routine clinical management. Plasma NGS was performed using a 73-gene commercial platform. Patients were enrolled at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania from April 1, 2016, through January 2, 2018. The database was locked for follow-up and analyses on January 2, 2018, with a median follow-up of 7 months (range, 1-21 months). Main Outcomes and Measures: The number of patients with targetable alterations detected with plasma and tissue NGS; the association between the allele fractions (AFs) of mutations detected in tissue and plasma; and the association of response rate with the plasma AF of the targeted mutations. Results: Among the 323 patients with NSCLC (60.1% female; median age, 65 years [range, 33-93 years]), therapeutically targetable mutations were detected in EGFR, ALK, MET, BRCA1, ROS1, RET, ERBB2, or BRAF for 113 (35.0%) overall. Ninety-four patients (29.1%) had plasma testing only at the discretion of the treating physician or patient preference. Among the 94 patients with plasma testing alone, 31 (33.0%) had a therapeutically targetable mutation detected, thus obviating the need for an invasive biopsy. Among the remaining 229 patients who had concurrent plasma and tissue NGS or were unable to have tissue NGS, a therapeutically targetable mutation was detected in tissue alone for 47 patients (20.5%), whereas the addition of plasma testing increased this number to 82 (35.8%). Thirty-six of 42 patients (85.7%) who received a targeted therapy based on the plasma result achieved a complete or a partial response or stable disease. The plasma-based targeted mutation AF had no correlation with depth of Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors response (r = -0.121; P = .45). Conclusions and Relevance: Integration of plasma NGS testing into the routine management of stage IV NSCLC demonstrates a marked increase of the detection of therapeutically targetable mutations and improved delivery of molecularly guided therapy.
Importance: The clinical implications of adding plasma-based circulating tumor DNA next-generation sequencing (NGS) to tissue NGS for targetable mutation detection in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have not been formally assessed. Objective: To determine whether plasma NGS testing was associated with improved mutation detection and enhanced delivery of personalized therapy in a real-world clinical setting. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective cohort study enrolled 323 patients with metastatic NSCLC who had plasma testing ordered as part of routine clinical management. Plasma NGS was performed using a 73-gene commercial platform. Patients were enrolled at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania from April 1, 2016, through January 2, 2018. The database was locked for follow-up and analyses on January 2, 2018, with a median follow-up of 7 months (range, 1-21 months). Main Outcomes and Measures: The number of patients with targetable alterations detected with plasma and tissue NGS; the association between the allele fractions (AFs) of mutations detected in tissue and plasma; and the association of response rate with the plasma AF of the targeted mutations. Results: Among the 323 patients with NSCLC (60.1% female; median age, 65 years [range, 33-93 years]), therapeutically targetable mutations were detected in EGFR, ALK, MET, BRCA1, ROS1, RET, ERBB2, or BRAF for 113 (35.0%) overall. Ninety-four patients (29.1%) had plasma testing only at the discretion of the treating physician or patient preference. Among the 94 patients with plasma testing alone, 31 (33.0%) had a therapeutically targetable mutation detected, thus obviating the need for an invasive biopsy. Among the remaining 229 patients who had concurrent plasma and tissue NGS or were unable to have tissue NGS, a therapeutically targetable mutation was detected in tissue alone for 47 patients (20.5%), whereas the addition of plasma testing increased this number to 82 (35.8%). Thirty-six of 42 patients (85.7%) who received a targeted therapy based on the plasma result achieved a complete or a partial response or stable disease. The plasma-based targeted mutation AF had no correlation with depth of Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors response (r = -0.121; P = .45). Conclusions and Relevance: Integration of plasma NGS testing into the routine management of stage IV NSCLC demonstrates a marked increase of the detection of therapeutically targetable mutations and improved delivery of molecularly guided therapy.
Authors: Erik von Elm; Douglas G Altman; Matthias Egger; Stuart J Pocock; Peter C Gøtzsche; Jan P Vandenbroucke Journal: Epidemiology Date: 2007-11 Impact factor: 4.822
Authors: Mark G Kris; Bruce E Johnson; Lynne D Berry; David J Kwiatkowski; A John Iafrate; Ignacio I Wistuba; Marileila Varella-Garcia; Wilbur A Franklin; Samuel L Aronson; Pei-Fang Su; Yu Shyr; D Ross Camidge; Lecia V Sequist; Bonnie S Glisson; Fadlo R Khuri; Edward B Garon; William Pao; Charles Rudin; Joan Schiller; Eric B Haura; Mark Socinski; Keisuke Shirai; Heidi Chen; Giuseppe Giaccone; Marc Ladanyi; Kelly Kugler; John D Minna; Paul A Bunn Journal: JAMA Date: 2014-05-21 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Karen L Reckamp; Vladislava O Melnikova; Chris Karlovich; Lecia V Sequist; D Ross Camidge; Heather Wakelee; Maurice Perol; Geoffrey R Oxnard; Karena Kosco; Peter Croucher; Errin Samuelsz; Cecile Rose Vibat; Shiloh Guerrero; Jennifer Geis; David Berz; Elaina Mann; Shannon Matheny; Lindsey Rolfe; Mitch Raponi; Mark G Erlander; Shirish Gadgeel Journal: J Thorac Oncol Date: 2016-07-25 Impact factor: 15.609
Authors: Elizabeth A Punnoose; Siminder Atwal; Weiqun Liu; Rajiv Raja; Bernard M Fine; Brett G M Hughes; Rodney J Hicks; Garret M Hampton; Lukas C Amler; Andrea Pirzkall; Mark R Lackner Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2012-04-05 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: David S Ettinger; Douglas E Wood; Wallace Akerley; Lyudmila A Bazhenova; Hossein Borghaei; David Ross Camidge; Richard T Cheney; Lucian R Chirieac; Thomas A D'Amico; Thomas J Dilling; M Chris Dobelbower; Ramaswamy Govindan; Mark Hennon; Leora Horn; Thierry M Jahan; Ritsuko Komaki; Rudy P Lackner; Michael Lanuti; Rogerio Lilenbaum; Jules Lin; Billy W Loo; Renato Martins; Gregory A Otterson; Jyoti D Patel; Katherine M Pisters; Karen Reckamp; Gregory J Riely; Steven E Schild; Theresa A Shapiro; Neelesh Sharma; James Stevenson; Scott J Swanson; Kurt Tauer; Stephen C Yang; Kristina Gregory; Miranda Hughes Journal: J Natl Compr Canc Netw Date: 2016-03 Impact factor: 11.908
Authors: Sarah-Jane Dawson; Dana W Y Tsui; Muhammed Murtaza; Heather Biggs; Oscar M Rueda; Suet-Feung Chin; Mark J Dunning; Davina Gale; Tim Forshew; Betania Mahler-Araujo; Sabrina Rajan; Sean Humphray; Jennifer Becq; David Halsall; Matthew Wallis; David Bentley; Carlos Caldas; Nitzan Rosenfeld Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2013-03-13 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Tony S K Mok; Sang-We Kim; Yi-Long Wu; Kazuhiko Nakagawa; Jin-Ji Yang; Myung-Ju Ahn; Jie Wang; James Chih-Hsin Yang; You Lu; Shinji Atagi; Santiago Ponce; Xiaojin Shi; Yuri Rukazenkov; Vincent Haddad; Kenneth S Thress; Jean-Charles Soria Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2017-10-02 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Aaron M Newman; Scott V Bratman; Jacqueline To; Jacob F Wynne; Neville C W Eclov; Leslie A Modlin; Chih Long Liu; Joel W Neal; Heather A Wakelee; Robert E Merritt; Joseph B Shrager; Billy W Loo; Ash A Alizadeh; Maximilian Diehn Journal: Nat Med Date: 2014-04-06 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Steven B Maron; Leah M Chase; Samantha Lomnicki; Sara Kochanny; Kelly L Moore; Smita S Joshi; Stacie Landron; Julie Johnson; Lesli A Kiedrowski; Rebecca J Nagy; Richard B Lanman; Seung Tae Kim; Jeeyun Lee; Daniel V T Catenacci Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2019-08-19 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: B T Li; F Janku; B Jung; C Hou; K Madwani; R Alden; P Razavi; J S Reis-Filho; R Shen; J M Isbell; A W Blocker; N Eattock; S Gnerre; R V Satya; H Xu; C Zhao; M P Hall; Y Hu; A J Sehnert; D Brown; M Ladanyi; C M Rudin; N Hunkapiller; N Feeney; G B Mills; C P Paweletz; P A Janne; D B Solit; G J Riely; A Aravanis; G R Oxnard Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2019-04-01 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Charu Aggarwal; Christian D Rolfo; Geoffrey R Oxnard; Jhanelle E Gray; Lynette M Sholl; David R Gandara Journal: Nat Rev Clin Oncol Date: 2020-09-11 Impact factor: 66.675
Authors: Charu Aggarwal; Jeffrey C Thompson; Austin L Chien; Katie J Quinn; Wei-Ting Hwang; Taylor A Black; Stephanie S Yee; Theresa E Christensen; Michael J LaRiviere; Benjamin A Silva; Kimberly C Banks; Rebecca J Nagy; Elena Helman; Abigail T Berman; Christine A Ciunci; Aditi P Singh; Jeffrey S Wasser; Joshua M Bauml; Corey J Langer; Roger B Cohen; Erica L Carpenter Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2020-02-26 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Ibiayi Dagogo-Jack; Marguerite Rooney; Jessica J Lin; Rebecca J Nagy; Beow Y Yeap; Harper Hubbeling; Emily Chin; Jennifer Ackil; Anna F Farago; Aaron N Hata; Jochen K Lennerz; Justin F Gainor; Richard B Lanman; Alice T Shaw Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2019-07-29 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Stepan M Esagian; Georgia Ι Grigoriadou; Ilias P Nikas; Vasileios Boikou; Peter M Sadow; Jae-Kyung Won; Konstantinos P Economopoulos Journal: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Date: 2020-05-27 Impact factor: 4.553