Literature DB >> 28968167

Gefitinib Plus Chemotherapy Versus Chemotherapy in Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation-Positive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Resistant to First-Line Gefitinib (IMPRESS): Overall Survival and Biomarker Analyses.

Tony S K Mok1, Sang-We Kim1, Yi-Long Wu1, Kazuhiko Nakagawa1, Jin-Ji Yang1, Myung-Ju Ahn1, Jie Wang1, James Chih-Hsin Yang1, You Lu1, Shinji Atagi1, Santiago Ponce1, Xiaojin Shi1, Yuri Rukazenkov1, Vincent Haddad1, Kenneth S Thress1, Jean-Charles Soria1.   

Abstract

Purpose The Iressa Mutation-Positive Multicentre Treatment Beyond ProgRESsion Study (IMPRESS) compared the continuation of gefitinib plus chemotherapy with placebo plus chemotherapy in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor ( EGFR) mutation-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer with progression (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1) after first-line gefitinib. Primary results indicated no difference between treatments in terms of progression-free survival (PFS). The current analysis presents final, mature, overall survival (OS) data, together with exploratory analyses that examined whether specific biomarkers, including T790M mutation status, were able to differentiate a relative treatment effect. Patients and Methods Patients were randomly assigned to gefitinib 250 mg or placebo, in addition to cisplatin 75 mg/m2 plus pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 (maximum of six cycles of chemotherapy). EGFR mutation status was determined from plasma-derived circulating free tumor-derived DNA samples (beads, emulsification, amplification, and magnetics digital polymerase chain reaction assay, allelic fraction analysis). Results A total of 265 patients with non-small-cell lung cancer were randomly assigned, and overall data maturity was 66%. Continuation of gefitinib plus cisplatin and pemetrexed was detrimental to OS when compared with placebo plus cisplatin and pemetrexed (hazard ratio [HR], 1.44; 95% CI, 1.07 to 1.94; P = .016; median OS, 13.4 v 19.5 months). The detriment was statistically significant in patients with T790M mutation-positive plasma samples (HR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.02 to 2.21), whereas statistical significance was not reached in T790M mutation-negative patients (HR, 1.15; 95% CI, 0.68 to 1.94). PFS in T790M mutation-positive patients was similar between treatments, and the difference observed in T790M mutation-negative patients did not reach statistical significance (HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.43 to 1.03; P = .0745). Conclusion Final OS data from IMPRESS are supportive of earlier PFS results and are sufficient to warn physicians against the continuation of treatment with first-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors beyond radiologic disease progression when chemotherapy is initiated. Plasma biomarker analyses suggest that this effect may be driven by T790M-positive status.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28968167     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2017.73.9250

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  50 in total

1.  The continued EGFR-TKI with cytotoxic chemotherapy at progression-poison or medicine?

Authors:  Shin-Kyo Yoon; Chang Min Choi; Jae Cheol Lee
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2018-04

2.  Exploiting MET dysregulation in EGFR-addicted non-small-cell lung carcinoma: a further step toward personalized medicine.

Authors:  Vincenzo Di Noia; Ettore D'Argento; Sara Pilotto; Miriam Grazia Ferrara; Michele Milella; Giampaolo Tortora; Emilio Bria
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2018-12

3.  Osimertinib therapy as first-line treatment before acquiring T790M mutation: from AURA1 trial.

Authors:  Kentaro Ito; Osamu Hataji
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 4.  Lung Cancers: Molecular Characterization, Clonal Heterogeneity and Evolution, and Cancer Stem Cells.

Authors:  Ugo Testa; Germana Castelli; Elvira Pelosi
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2018-07-27       Impact factor: 6.639

5.  EGFR Mutation Testing: Changing Patterns of Molecular Testing in Brazil.

Authors:  Sofia Palacio; Luciola Pontes; Edna Prado; Junaid Arshad; Robert Ali; Tony Piha; Carlos Eduardo Bacchi; Raja Mudad; Gilberto Lopes
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2018-11-16

6.  Clinical Implications of Plasma-Based Genotyping With the Delivery of Personalized Therapy in Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Charu Aggarwal; Jeffrey C Thompson; Taylor A Black; Sharyn I Katz; Ryan Fan; Stephanie S Yee; Austin L Chien; Tracey L Evans; Joshua M Bauml; Evan W Alley; Christine A Ciunci; Abigail T Berman; Roger B Cohen; David B Lieberman; Krishna S Majmundar; Samantha L Savitch; Jennifer J D Morrissette; Wei-Ting Hwang; Kojo S J Elenitoba-Johnson; Corey J Langer; Erica L Carpenter
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 31.777

Review 7.  Lung cancer in never smokers-the East Asian experience.

Authors:  Fei Zhou; Caicun Zhou
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2018-08

Review 8.  Strategies to overcome acquired resistance to EGFR TKI in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  J Gao; H-R Li; C Jin; J-H Jiang; J-Y Ding
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2019-03-12       Impact factor: 3.405

9.  OX40 and OX40L protein expression of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes in non-small cell lung cancer and its role in clinical outcome and relationships with other immune biomarkers.

Authors:  Yayi He; Xiaoshen Zhang; Keyi Jia; Rafal Dziadziuszko; Sha Zhao; Juan Deng; Hao Wang; Fred R Hirsch; Caicun Zhou
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2019-08

Review 10.  Therapeutic Strategies in EGFR Mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Herbert H Loong; Sui-Chun Sampson Kwan; Tony Shu-Kam Mok; Yat-Ming Lau
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2018-09-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.