| Literature DB >> 30325924 |
Audrey I Nisbet1, Geoffrey Omuse2, Gunturu Revathi2, Rodney D Adam2,3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Relevant seroprevalence data for endemic pathogens in a given region provide insight not only into a population's susceptibility to acute infection or risk for reactivation disease but also into the potential need for policy initiatives aimed at reducing these risks. Data from sub-Saharan Africa are sparse and since Aga Khan University Hospital Nairobi is an internationally accredited hospital equipped with a laboratory electronic medical record system, analysis of pertinent local seroprevalence data has been made possible.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30325924 PMCID: PMC6191086 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204867
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Regional Analysis for T. gondii.
| Location | % Positive (95% CI) |
|---|---|
| Kisumu (n = 44) | 52% |
| Mombasa (n = 160) | 57% |
| Nairobi (n = 1023) | 27% |
Nairobi vs. Kisumu: Fisher’s exact two-tailed P = 0.0005
Nairobi vs. Mombasa: Fisher’s exact two-tailed P < 0.0001
Age Analysis in Nairobi for T. gondii (age 1 to 49).
| Age | % Positive |
|---|---|
| 1 to 9 | 0% (n = 7) |
| 10 to 19 | 22% (n = 9) |
| 20 to 29 | 30% (n = 271) |
| 30 to 39 | 24% (n = 611) |
| 40 to 49 | 37% (n = 104) |
Rubella seroprevalence by age for females aged 20 to 49.
| Age | % Positive |
|---|---|
| 20 to 29 | 88% (n = 798) |
| 30 to 39 | 89% (n = 1408) |
| 40 to 49 | 90% (n = 145) |
| Total | 89% (n = 2351) |
Age analysis for Hepatitis A antibody.
| Age | Acute infection | Past infection | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | % Positive | Total | % Positive | |
| 1 to 4 | 167 | 63% | 27 | 12 (44%) |
| 5 to 9 | 251 | 70% | 24 | 17 (71%) |
| 10 to 14 | 190 | 68% | 24 | 14 (58%) |
| 15 to 19 | 314 | 60% | 54 | 30 (56%) |
| 20 to 24 | 377 | 51% | 62 | 49 (79%) |
| 25 to 29 | 444 | 27% | 127 | 112 (88%) |
| 30 to 34 | 417 | 18% | 126 | 114 (90%) |
| 35 to 39 | 312 | 14% | 105 | 95 (90%) |
| 40 to 44 | 238 | 8% | 96 | 92 (96%) |
| 45 to 49 | 188 | 7% | 83 | 72 (87%) |
| 50 to 54 | 148 | 4% | 64 | 61 (95%) |
| 55 to 59 | 72 | 7% | 35 | 35 (100%) |
| 60 to 64 | 62 | 6% | 27 | 22 (81%) |
| 65 to 69 | 29 | 10% | 10 | 9 (90%) |
| 70 to 99 | 54 | 2% | 28 | 28 (100%) |
For past infection: Age 1 to 19 (57% positive; n = 129) vs. 20 to 99 (90% positive; n = 763); Fisher’s exact two-tailed P < 0.0001
Fig 1Age analysis for Hepatitis A antibody.
The top panel shows the percent of positive tests by age category in five year increments. Age less than one year is omitted because of small numbers and the potential for maternal antibody to affect the total antibody results. All patients above 70 years are grouped together because of small numbers. The lower panel consists of the patients who had both IgM and total antibody performed and whose IgM was negative. The error bars demonstrate the 95% confidence intervals.